Wait, what?Any state that mixes Sprite and brandy and calls it an old fashioned, can eat ****.
Am I crazy in thinking no football player should ever sign this?
What even is the upside from revenue sharing for these players? We are talking about selling bitcoin for a pizza levels of risk.
Am I crazy in thinking no football player should ever sign this?
What even is the upside from revenue sharing for these players? We are talking about selling bitcoin for a pizza levels of risk.
Google a Wisconsin Old Fashioned. It’s usually cheap brandy, muddled orange and cherries, bitters, sugar and either club soda or sprite topper.Wait, what?
Please tell me you’re joking. That’s more ****ed up than this POS they call a MOU.
And that’s why it’s complete crap. These schools and the conference have all their lawyers and money on their side, versus these kids and their parents, many (most) of whom don’t have the resources to get the contract reviewed by their own attorneys. They are just being bullied into signing it, seeing dollar signs, not knowing that it’s a raw deal.Some parts of that draft template document they haven’t released or been reported on me total sense, some of them I am not well-versed enough in to comment on in other words I have tons of experience dealing with similar aspects with artists brands media athletes etc. and any company employer with never allowed to have happens especially the arbitrary reason up or down of payments within the terms of an agreement. Never seen deescalation clause on performance (that would come during a renegotiation), only floors with escalation on performance.
It’s total bull****, and I would say the same thing if we find out the ACC and Miami has those aspects in as well. Any average attorney with a P/NIL knowledge would never allow that in like that
I don’t put my full background out here all the time but let’s just say the things I’m referencing involve people in town and brands you’ve never heard of as well as some of the most talent and brands in the entire world.
For those about to rock…
It was quite obvious to us attorneys even before seeing the MOU that they were taking advantage of these kids.
Contract law also is supposed to provide for equity and fairness. This may be one of the clearest examples of unjust enrichment I’ve seen since law school. I really am baffled by what they were thinking; the arrogance is astounding. If there isn’t more to the story then…wow.
I demand a tribunal. What the ****Google a Wisconsin Old Fashioned. It’s usually cheap brandy, muddled orange and cherries, bitters, sugar and either club soda or sprite topper.
Oh that’s interesting. So Wisconsin’s MOU may also differ from other schools’?I've been told that the one-sided contractual terms arose from the Big 10, and that Wisconsin added the 2-year "grant of rights" bull****.
If that is the pinnacle of rivalry in that conference for us, we are already losing.Talk about a ready made rivalry when we move to the BIG10, eh?
The Xavier Lucas Cup, baby.
UW needs more of these…
View attachment 318348