- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
- Messages
- 12,210
I don’t think WVU wants anything to do with Holgorsen or anything from that eraHe was linked to WVU but boosters are set on brining Rich Rod back
I don’t think WVU wants anything to do with Holgorsen or anything from that eraHe was linked to WVU but boosters are set on brining Rich Rod back
Dawson needs to put together back-to-back seasons with a high flying offense before garnering more attention. He needs to show ADs that our production was a result of his scheme and not simply Ward.East Carolina and Tulsa looked like the logical spots and both filled
I was watching Tulane but apparently Sumrall is sticking around.
Haven’t really seen a thing about Dawson linked to anything
Emory won't stay and compete at least through spring? He's got 2 more years in Dawson's system than this guy.We get him and Emory hits the portal but I see more in him than Emory
Fair...but he played really well. For scrambling as much as he does he hasnt thrown a ton of INT's.Idk if he 'put it all together' vs bama.
They basically said "**** it. We're running you into the ground"
His running ability is very intriguing. He understands how to get outside to force an angle from the DB. He can take on contact.Fair...but he played really well. For scrambling as much as he does he hasnt thrown a ton of INT's.
Ill have to rewatch this one...maybe I just rushed through it a bit.
Thomas Castellanos
You’re not understanding lol..im saying bringing Arnold in imo is basically the staff giving Emory a good chance to start compared to bringing in someone provenBecause he is more talented than Emory and has better tools to work with. Nobody wants to go back to having a statue in the pocket
Ah ok I see now lol. I mean I don’t think it would be a legit competition any way. You not paying one of these dudes to come in and sit on the benchYou’re not understanding lol..im saying bringing Arnold in imo is basically the staff having giving Emory a good chance to start compared to bringing in someone proven
Im not debating emory and arnold, im saying he shouldn’t be a top choice as a lone portal qb
Idk. But it’s still an unknown until it isntI’m just curious where is he going? East Carolina? Charlotte?
Emery’s arm strength sucks and those are the facts. If he leaves, it’s fine by me.Emory won't stay and compete at least through spring? He's got 2 more years in Dawson's system than this guy.
Dawson needs to put together back-to-back seasons with a high flying offense before garnering more attention. He needs to show ADs that our production was a result of his scheme and not simply Ward.
No.Thomas Castellanos
Agree with you. Granted the 3 games I saw Tulane play this year (KSU/Memphis/Army) they lost, but I liked him less the more I saw of him. The KSU performance was impressive. His numbers are great, but he'd have to make a big leap in the off-season to be more than a game-manager type in the ACC. Tulane had a great rushing attack and his receivers were really good and often had a ton of separation. He throws a beautiful moonball deepball and has a ton of potential, but I think there will be growing pains when he's forced to throw the ball into tighter windows. Like, the TD against Army to the TE near the goal line 100% is an interception in the ACC.He definitely has arm talent but is far from a sure thing. Watched a few condensed games and his youth shows at times especially when pressured. I don’t know if he’s the guy you wanna plug and play to beat UF and ND to start the year.
It would be a good pick up but anyone who would take him over Mateer/Weigman/Arnold/Raiola is clinically insane. It’s harder to project him since he comes from a G5 and doesn’t have tape against above average P4 comp. There’s more to it than a couple splash play highlights, how does he handle a 3rd and 10 blitz against UF, ND?
It seems as if Mateer is off the table. How does this guy stack up with Jackson Arnold? That would be my first choice.