- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 3,245
This will be a very good class if we land Herbert, Slaton, Harley, and Smith.
Probably 12-15. That's good, but we have regularly achieved this before
Golden made dudes comfortable with that underachieving. I'll admit I was comfortable with a top 15 class every now and again. That's not going to get you anywhere though if you don't have good-to-elite coaching. Clemson has had only two top 10 classes since 2011 for example yet they are contenders every year.
With the coaches we have, there's no reason that we shouldn't have a top 10 class annually and compete in the conference championship. I'll give Richt the benefit of the doubt having this year having to coach Goldens' specials, 9 banned spots, and little depth while playing a bunch of freshmen. Anything less than a Coastal Championship next year and we might as well begin to fly banners.
None of Butch's recruiting classes were top 10 annually. We haven't ever recruited at that level when we weren't winning big. Coker had 3-4 in a row that were top 10, but that was coming off being at the very top of the CFB world, and Coker missed badly on his player evaluations. I think the narrative that we should have top ten recruiting classes even when we aren't winning is a bit misguided. The OPs notion that we aren't seeing a bump isn't wrong, but we signing day is still a month and a half away. And if we end up with a class just outside the top 10 we are bringing in enough talent. When we start winning 10 games a year there is no reason not to expect top ten classes. But we need to win on the field, and to do that in 2017 we need help improvement on the o-line. This class IS delivering that.