% chances per RW from Grassy

I'll give Random Walk this, he has a way of capturing an audience with his posting style. However, that being said, the next time he "Breaks" information will be the first time.

Yep. And in recruiting, the great "insight" is pretty much what was in the OP. "As good a chance as any", "looks ok", "50/50", "we are looking good but others are making a play". I mean its all vague common knowledge stuff.
 
Advertisement
When OCF wasn't yelling at people to get off his lawn, he was logging onto his computer to act like a **** on Canestime.
 
Lol does anyone think it's funny that bomb basically said how chef isn't legit after defending him for years?
 
My guess from interacting with RW and OCF on message boards and the stuff that they post, is that their knowledge is more or less centered on the bigger issues that the program faces which leads me to believe they are possibly connected to someone(s) on the board of trustees that has interest in the athletic department. I take the recruiting information with a grain of salt.
I doubt anyone had a clue regarding Deon Bush and Tracey Howard recruitment last year. So any information regarding Thomas, Kirkland, AC etc., is just anybody's guess.
 
Advertisement
My guess from interacting with RW and OCF on message boards and the stuff that they post, is that their knowledge is more or less centered on the bigger issues that the program faces which leads me to believe they are possibly connected to someone(s) on the board of trustees that has interest in the athletic department. I take the recruiting information with a grain of salt.
I doubt anyone had a clue regarding Deon Bush and Tracey Howard recruitment last year. So any information regarding Thomas, Kirkland, AC etc., is just anybody's guess.

OCF has never been into recruiting info, so in that regard, yes, he was definitely a "big picture" "protect the U" kind of guy. RW though gets himself into every type of discussion. From Recruiting, to the coaching search, etc. So he may have a hook on the BOT, but it doesnt explain how much info he has on so many different areas if it was just that.

There is also his early days, before he evolved into a "big shot" flying around on private jets, I could honestly swear he was giving game breakdowns and saying he was a former coach.
 
My guess from interacting with RW and OCF on message boards and the stuff that they post, is that their knowledge is more or less centered on the bigger issues that the program faces which leads me to believe they are possibly connected to someone(s) on the board of trustees that has interest in the athletic department. I take the recruiting information with a grain of salt.
I doubt anyone had a clue regarding Deon Bush and Tracey Howard recruitment last year. So any information regarding Thomas, Kirkland, AC etc., is just anybody's guess.

OCF has never been into recruiting info, so in that regard, yes, he was definitely a "big picture" "protect the U" kind of guy. RW though gets himself into every type of discussion. From Recruiting, to the coaching search, etc. So he may have a hook on the BOT, but it doesnt explain how much info he has on so many different areas if it was just that.

There is also his early days, before he evolved into a "big shot" flying around on private jets, I could honestly swear he was giving game breakdowns and saying he was a former coach.

He seems like an attorney to me. It was funny, UM started recruiting some player from NY (maybe Dominique Easley) and RW mentioned how he knew Easley's (or whoever it was) high school coach. That was in the same year that he knew just about every high school coach in Florida. lol, i'm sure.
 
And don't forget that RW just like Shannon educated himself hiding under his bed reading books with bullets whizzing overhead just like Shannon. Self made billionaire. The modern day Horatio Alger story.
 
Lol does anyone think it's funny that bomb basically said how chef isn't legit after defending him for years?

Where did I say a single word about Chef here, except that he and RW are not the same person?

Or are you just doing your usual juvenile angry rant attack schtick, accuracy be damned? If that's the case, I'll hang up and listen. Thanks for taking my call.
 
Advertisement
Lol does anyone think it's funny that bomb basically said how chef isn't legit after defending him for years?

Where did I say a single word about Chef here, except that he and RW are not the same person?

Or are you just doing your usual juvenile angry rant attack schtick, accuracy be damned? If that's the case, I'll hang up and listen. Thanks for taking my call.


Well bomb, you said "He's legit. Not chef." What could you possibly have meant by that? They aren't the same person? Uh, okay. Thanks for the input lol. Couldn't have figured that one out. Who said they were?
 
Lol does anyone think it's funny that bomb basically said how chef isn't legit after defending him for years?

Where did I say a single word about Chef here, except that he and RW are not the same person?

Or are you just doing your usual juvenile angry rant attack schtick, accuracy be damned? If that's the case, I'll hang up and listen. Thanks for taking my call.


Well bomb, you said "He's legit. Not chef." What could you possibly have meant by that? They aren't the same person? Uh, okay. Thanks for the input lol. Couldn't have figured that one out. Who said they were?

**** you got me (not sarcastic). CANE4LIFE said that he thought he was Chefcane Part II or something in the post I quoted and responded to. I read it as he was saying he thought he was Chef. My "not chef" comment was only to say that they aren't the same person. Read it wrong. My bad.
 
Lol does anyone think it's funny that bomb basically said how chef isn't legit after defending him for years?

Where did I say a single word about Chef here, except that he and RW are not the same person?

Or are you just doing your usual juvenile angry rant attack schtick, accuracy be damned? If that's the case, I'll hang up and listen. Thanks for taking my call.


Well bomb, you said "He's legit. Not chef." What could you possibly have meant by that? They aren't the same person? Uh, okay. Thanks for the input lol. Couldn't have figured that one out. Who said they were?

**** you got me (not sarcastic). CANE4LIFE said that he thought he was Chefcane Part II or something in the post I quoted and responded to. I read it as he was saying he thought he was Chef. My "not chef" comment was only to say that they aren't the same person. Read it wrong. My bad.

All good
 
I can not recall one single post from Random Walk that would show his insider-ness. Never saw a post where he predicted something that wasn't otherwise common knowledge and have never seen a post detailing something that otherwise wouldn't be known about.

He may be connected to the U, but that knowledge and connection has never come out in his posting. What he says comes in a nice package and he rarely gives his straight forward opinion...and even when he does, its vague as **** and nothing that hasn't been said before by someone that isn't close to the U.
 
Advertisement
I just find it funny that Bomb protects the same people here that he did over at Grassy.
 
I can not recall one single post from Random Walk that would show his insider-ness. Never saw a post where he predicted something that wasn't otherwise common knowledge and have never seen a post detailing something that otherwise wouldn't be known about.

He may be connected to the U, but that knowledge and connection has never come out in his posting. What he says comes in a nice package and his rarely gives his straight forward opinion...and even when he does, its vague as **** and nothing that hasn't been said before by someone that isn't close to the U.

Way to Articulate it Larold.
 
Hasn't Pete been saying exactly what Random Walk just said for months now?

This post is the poster child (lol) for Random Walk posts...nothing there is "inside" or exclusive at all.
 
Advertisement
I just find it funny that Bomb protects the same people here that he did over at Grassy.

Who am I protecting?:-)

I don't know this guy RW at all and I am not "protecting" him. I am sharing what I know. I could not care less what anyone thinks of this guy. I could not care less if anyone believes what I share. I'm just contributing what I know on the subject, which I believe. I'm not going to argue against anyone who has a different opinion.

Not sure why you are trying to stir it up. Why not just act civil and stick to the subject at hand?
 
I know no one questioned rw on scout. Ever. So what changed. IMO should get him here.

I did all the time

Dude's a fake insider, or if he is a real insider he has not posted anything resembling "inside information." Larry's post summed it all up. It's all vague nonsense.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top