- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 19,335
What is your methodology for evaluating an AD candidate behind a computer?
You don't know anything. Neither do I. It's throwing darts. At least with a coach, we can watch the product. None of us have heard of any of these guys until this week. We aren't in the room and we aren't asking the questions.
As for the "Columbus Crew," the irony is that they are the guys doing everything that message board posters want. They pushed Jurich, they pushed to fire Blake and they are pushing to fire Manny. The three guys most responsible for the Manny hire (who is half-white, doesn't speak Spanish and went to Miami Country Day) were Blake James, David Epstein and Mark Richt.
It's a dumb angle.
Absolutely a fair critique that none of us are qualified to evaluate candidates like Nunez or Hernandez or even White. That said, we wouldn't need to because our standard would be an established Power 5 AD whose resume is easily deciphered by the layman as one containing tangible success as an actual AD. When the school starts talking about making a REAL investment in athletics then THAT'S the candidate pool we should expect.
The Cuban/Hispanic stuff has crossed the line on a few fronts here and I can absolutely see why people would take offense to some of that.
You're absolutely right about the Manny hire and I personally have NEVER attributed it to any Cuban influence. In fact, I've often mocked those that have too often wayyyy overstated his father's influence over and in anything.
My point about the Columbus Crew is they're seemingly ALL IN on Mario and Zo. And that all power will be centralized around them and Mario/Zo. Even their supposed advocacy of Jurich was still kinda based on him being desperate and willing to accept Zo.
I just want strong leadership in all spots. Otherwise we're building another house of cards that could tumble with ramifications across all sports.