HurricaneU
American Patriot
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 2,933
These are fairly meaningless statistics. They are just numbers and porsters will read into what they wish.
Not even close in talent - cant see anyone from this year (or last year) starting in front of the 2001 class. In fact most would be 3rd string ---- I know that sounds crazy but on the bench in 2001 was Vince W, S Taylor, A Rolle .... I will stop there
It wasnt just that these teams had NFL talent, these guys went on to START in the NFL and many ended up being all Pro. If players on this current team doubled their output do you see any of them being all pro at the next level? Not even close
Not even close in talent - cant see anyone from this year (or last year) starting in front of the 2001 class. In fact most would be 3rd string ---- I know that sounds crazy but on the bench in 2001 was Vince W, S Taylor, A Rolle .... I will stop there
It wasnt just that these teams had NFL talent, these guys went on to START in the NFL and many ended up being all Pro. If players on this current team doubled their output do you see any of them being all pro at the next level? Not even close
+1MM. Your hate of Golden is blurring reality and history.
If Randy was really that great of a defensive coordinator he would colleges and even pro teams begging for his services. He may or may not be a good DC, but the reality is what ncn wrote. Those teams had crazy talent.
crossover22[]_[];1922540 said:Miami should never be out of the top 25 defenses.
Why are we turning this into a Randy vs Golden argument.Let's just focus on Goldens defenses at 3 diferent schools now and the results have been the same.Awful his first 3-4 years.really as bad as it can get 60s,90s and even 120s,wow. Then once he has experience he has coached 2 top 20 defenses,this is what we hope happens here soon.
How is improving Temple and UVA into top 25 defenses awful?
If you don't know how to interpret stats then steer clear of them.
These are fairly meaningless statistics. They are just numbers and porsters will read into what they wish.
These are fairly meaningless statistics. They are just numbers and porsters will read into what they wish.
Interpretation: These stats don't support my narrative, therefore they are meaningless.
golden took over a temple program that was thrown out of the big east and almost disbanded. his last two years they did well. He made a basketball player in muhammed wilkerson a pro bowl caliber guy. also out knighton and jaquan jarred in NFL. that is a miracle what they did at temple.
These are fairly meaningless statistics. They are just numbers and porsters will read into what they wish.
Interpretation: These stats don't support my narrative, therefore they are meaningless.
golden took over a temple program that was thrown out of the big east and almost disbanded. his last two years they did well. He made a basketball player in muhammed wilkerson a pro bowl caliber guy. also out knighton and jaquan jarred in NFL. that is a miracle what they did at temple.
He also had some advantages from the rest of the teams in that conference.He had a much larger recruiting budget and he could get anyone in academically who would not qualify for most if not all of the other teams in that conference.
Not even close in talent - cant see anyone from this year (or last year) starting in front of the 2001 class. In fact most would be 3rd string ---- I know that sounds crazy but on the bench in 2001 was Vince W, S Taylor, A Rolle .... I will stop there
It wasnt just that these teams had NFL talent, these guys went on to START in the NFL and many ended up being all Pro. If players on this current team doubled their output do you see any of them being all pro at the next level? Not even close
+1MM. Your hate of Golden is blurring reality and history.
If Randy was really that great of a defensive coordinator he would colleges and even pro teams begging for his services. He may or may not be a good DC, but the reality is what ncn wrote. Those teams had crazy talent.
Randy was promoted to Senior Associate Head Coach which is next to the HC. So we may never see him as DC as his next move will be another HC job
Some of you can say what you want. The numbers NEVER LIE. We need to stop defending Golden. Is he a great coach? Who knows, too early to tell (too late for some). Is he a great recruiter? Yes . I think that's all we know about Golden and our DC for the time being. RS was a poor HC but a great DC.
These are fairly meaningless statistics. They are just numbers and porsters will read into what they wish.
Interpretation: These stats don't support my narrative, therefore they are meaningless.
Poor effort Miami82.
My sig should make my stance fairly obvious. But these are just numbers put next to each other. They have no baseline nor do they account for rather obvious variables.
This isn't a regression analysis. It isn't a predictive algorithm.
A more compelling analysis would look at ranked opponents, opponents offensive production, time of possession , etc.
I don't need a non-random sampling of two different programs, multiples of years apart by two different coaches to know our defense sucks.
Do you?