The Past Decade: Revealed

Advertisement
Just do us a favor. Don't ever.....EVER....tell us again that Jim Morris has won two championships. You people have now firmly put yourselves in the camp that Jim Morris had nothing to do with those titles.

He had nothing to do with the program he built? Now that's funny. You really can't be that dumb or you have something against Morris that you can't be objective.
 
You know what Morris isn't doing right out of all of those things, though? He's not winning in Omaha. Not a good look...and that's what people are discussing.

You're discussing it stupidly though. You look like a clown saying that you think the first 62 games are great but then turning around and giving substantial weight to 2 games at the end.

Outside of just having better players there's really nothing he could have done to change Mediavilla's performance or the outcomes in general.

And even having better players doesn't guarantee anything.
 
So sad that Miami fans are so championship-averse these days.

I'm no more championship 'averse' than you are.

I just understand that I have no say in the outcome. I just try to understand what I'm watching. You just like to whine when things don't go your way.
 
Here's what's funny: they claim that the coin flips only begin in Omaha. How desperate and predictable is that.

Another lie.

The regular season is 55 games. That's enough games where the better teams will separate themselves (for the most part). Because of success in the regular season certain teams are given advantages in the regional and super regional.

The best teams are seeded and get to host.

There are real advantages in the first two rounds. Once you get to Omaha those advantages are wiped away. Miami got no advantage against Arizona for being the better team. It was a single random baseball game played at neutral site.

If we have a great regular season and get a national seed and fail to get to Omaha that's a failure. If we host a regional as a 1-seed and fail to get to the super regional that's a failure.
 
Advertisement
Just do us a favor. Don't ever.....EVER....tell us again that Jim Morris has won two championships. You people have now firmly put yourselves in the camp that Jim Morris had nothing to do with those titles.

Silliness and proof of a desperate and ignorant soul.

Jim Morris got his team to Omaha 6 out of 7 years. An almost unparalleled run. They delivered in two of those trips. They arguably had the best team both of those seasons so it was a fair result too.
 
Soft program that folds when things get tough.

Typical fanboy cliche.

So Miami can win 50 of their first 62 games. Beat Louisville 2 out of 3. Sweep Clemson. Beat Florida State 2 out of 3. Win the regional. Win the super regional.

But then suddenly they're soft!
 
Just do us a favor. Don't ever.....EVER....tell us again that Jim Morris has won two championships. You people have now firmly put yourselves in the camp that Jim Morris had nothing to do with those titles.

He had nothing to do with the program he built? Now that's funny. You really can't be that dumb or you have something against Morris that you can't be objective.

Can't have it both ways, boss. Either Omaha is "random error", or our success was because of the "program he built." You guys get together and decide which one it is, because you've said both. If it's random error in 2016, then it was random error in 2001. If 2001 in Omaha is credited to Morris, then Morris gets the blame for 2016 in Omaha. We're not falling for "it's random except for the years when Jim Morris wins".
 
Advertisement
The high school historian needs something to do. When does fall practice start.

Your comrade has gone on record as saying that the randomness begins in Omaha. It's like one page back. If he's wrong, call him out.
 
Soft program that folds when things get tough.

Typical fanboy cliche.

So Miami can win 50 of their first 62 games. Beat Louisville 2 out of 3. Sweep Clemson. Beat Florida State 2 out of 3. Win the regional. Win the super regional.

But then suddenly they're soft!

Look at the teams you listed. Yes, soft. Not a championship program. Need proof? Check your DVR for the last 15 World Series.
 
Your comrade has gone on record as saying that the randomness begins in Omaha. It's like one page back. If he's wrong, call him out.

It doesn't begin there. It's just more random. The odds are less favorable to the better team.

It's a minor thing. At least he understands it. What's your excuse?
 
You know what Morris isn't doing right out of all of those things, though? He's not winning in Omaha. Not a good look...and that's what people are discussing.

You're discussing it stupidly though. You look like a clown saying that you think the first 62 games are great but then turning around and giving substantial weight to 2 games at the end.

Outside of just having better players there's really nothing he could have done to change Mediavilla's performance or the outcomes in general.

And even having better players doesn't guarantee anything.

He's giving substantial weight to the games that determine the national champion? NO SHT. How long did it take you to figure that one out?

And what kind of attitude is that anyway? Again, when did we decide that regular season accolades are good enough?
 
Advertisement
The high school historian needs something to do. When does fall practice start.

Your comrade has gone on record as saying that the randomness begins in Omaha. It's like one page back. If he's wrong, call him out.

They're contradicting each other because they're so focused on calling people stupid. They don't see what the others are posting.
 
Look at the teams you listed. Yes, soft. Not a championship program. Need proof? Check your DVR for the last 15 World Series.

What can I say.

You're just a fanboy who spouts cliches.

This team came from behind to win something like 20 times this year. They almost always found a way.

It's an insult to them and and insult to our intelligence to say that the issue was some kind of softness or frailty that caused them to lose 2 games in Omaha.
 
Your comrade has gone on record as saying that the randomness begins in Omaha. It's like one page back. If he's wrong, call him out.

It doesn't begin there. It's just more random. The odds are less favorable to the better team.

It's a minor thing. At least he understands it. What's your excuse?

Excuse for what? Calling out the contradictions between you and calculator boy? I don't need excuses. If he understood it he wouldn't constantly refer to baseball games as "coin flips".
 
Advertisement
Look at the teams you listed. Yes, soft. Not a championship program. Need proof? Check your DVR for the last 15 World Series.

What can I say.

You're just a fanboy who spouts cliches.

This team came from behind to win something like 20 times this year. They almost always found a way.

It's an insult to them and and insult to our intelligence to say that the issue was some kind of softness or frailty that caused them to lose 2 games in Omaha.

Yeah, I heard. We lost in 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 because it's random. Darn luck. But we won in 2001 because of Jim Morris. We heard it all.
 
He's giving substantial weight to the games that determine the national champion? NO SHT.

But he's doing it stupidly.

Of course those games determine the national champion but they're not different than any other baseball game. The same laws that govern the game on every other day govern it on that day. He's arguing that going 0-2 was some kind of structural failure within the team or the coaching staff.

That should be embarrassing to anybody of average intelligence.

The same silliness that can cause a team to lose to an inferior opponent in March can cause a team to lose to an inferior opponent in Omaha.
 
What can I say.

The same things you always say. Fanboys. Cliches. Delusional. In other words, nothing.

While defending a guy who coaches one of the premiere programs in college baseball but has won two games on the big stage in ten years.

Because random. Coastal. 2001.
 
Look at the teams you listed. Yes, soft. Not a championship program. Need proof? Check your DVR for the last 15 World Series.

What can I say.

You're just a fanboy who spouts cliches.

This team came from behind to win something like 20 times this year. They almost always found a way.

It's an insult to them and and insult to our intelligence to say that the issue was some kind of softness or frailty that caused them to lose 2 games in Omaha.

Yeah, I heard. We lost in 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 because it's random. Darn luck. But we won in 2001 because of Jim Morris. We heard it all.


Crazy their logic
 
Advertisement
Back
Top