The Past Decade: Revealed

[Brian Piccolo]

And the teams that did were, by winning or losing on the field, the best team at the end of the year.

No they weren't.

I don't think you even realize how dumb that statement is.

 

[BWCD]

So, everything is in a vacuum to you, and we can just excuse away bad losses on the biggest stage with randomness/bad luck.

You keep asking questions because you know so little about this and therefore have so few answers.

When a 50-win team goes 0-2 against teams the caliber of Arizona and UCSB then yes. It's a reason. Not an excuse.

So, a 50-win team going 0-2 against those teams is by your definition a fluke, and has nothing to do with any performances by players, coaches, or managers? It's all just random?

And I'm asking questions because I see how badly you're tying yourself up in knots, logically speaking.

 

[cane since birth]

Learn your lesson and stop assuming

7,275 posts.

All incoherent.

You read all 7,275? Like how you falling back to my post number when you have nothing else weak sauce mane, another jagr move by you

 

[BWCD]

Why has anyone at any level of competition ever changed coaches in any sport ever, then? If this is all just unrelated and random?

Because you're bad at comprehension once again.

A large sample size is not unrelated and random. Good coaches can make a difference. That difference can get you real tangible advantages in the postseason......up until Omaha.

So, Morris's managing ability has NO bearing on our success or failure when we get to Omaha? Is that what you would have us believe?

Absolutely amazing.

 

[BWCD]

So, you have no solution, and you're whining.

No. Just explaining to ignorant people.

Whining is saying that random stuff is unacceptable.

Performing badly on the big stage isn't random. I don't care what statistic you put on it to paint it, it sucks. Plain & simple.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

So, a 50-win team going 0-2 against those teams is by your definition a fluke, and has nothing to do with any performances by players, coaches, or managers?

The performance of the players is what's random.

It's a sport where 70% failure is good.

It's one of the few sports (with golf) where great players can get the yips and can't throw a ball 5 feet.

 

[BWCD]

And the teams that did were, by winning or losing on the field, the best team at the end of the year.

No they weren't.

I don't think you even realize how dumb that statement is.

So...Zona/CCU don't deserve to be crowned national champs? That's an insane claim.

They persevered through the process of the postseason, and whoever wins is the best at the end of that process, no matter how much you want to pooh-pooh it. Whoever wins will be the national champs and the best team this year.

If the national champs aren't the best team, then who the fvck is?

 

[Brian Piccolo]

So, Morris's managing ability has NO bearing on our success or failure when we get to Omaha? Is that what you would have us believe?

You're quickly becoming one of the dumbest posters on here.

Small sample sizes afford coaches less chances to impact the outcome. Just like better teams are more vulnerable in small sample sizes as opposed to larger ones.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

So...Zona/CCU don't deserve to be crowned national champs? That's an insane claim.

See what I mean?

You have to completely fabricate a statement to defend yourself.

I never said anything about deserving the championship or not. If they win it they deserve it.

The issue here is calling the national champion the best team. It's not the same thing.

 

[BWCD]

So, a 50-win team going 0-2 against those teams is by your definition a fluke, and has nothing to do with any performances by players, coaches, or managers?

The performance of the players is what's random.

It's a sport where 70% failure is good.

It's one of the few sports (with golf) where great players can get the yips and can't throw a ball 5 feet.

So, blame the players, not Morris.

If it's all on the players, though - couldn't we save some scratch by just hiring me to manage them? I'd do it a lot cheaper, and we can keep the same players.

 

[BWCD]

So...Zona/CCU don't deserve to be crowned national champs? That's an insane claim.

See what I mean?

You have to completely fabricate a statement to defend yourself.

I never said anything about deserving the championship or not. If they win it they deserve it.

The issue here is calling the national champion the best team. It's not the same thing.

Then who is the best team, this year?

If it's those guys in Gainesville sitting at home and not in Omaha, then that's news to them.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

If the national champs aren't the best team, then who the fvck is?

The best team is the best team.

The national champion is the national champion.

Sometimes it's the same team (although rare).

 

[Brian Piccolo]

If it's all on the players, though - couldn't we save some scratch by just hiring me to manage them?

More nonsense to cover for your extreme incompetence.

No because you'd suck and we would never even get to Omaha.

 

[BWCD]

So, Morris's managing ability has NO bearing on our success or failure when we get to Omaha? Is that what you would have us believe?

You're quickly becoming one of the dumbest posters on here.

I've got a LONG way to go to catch you, hoss.

Small sample sizes afford coaches less chances to impact the outcome. Just like better teams are more vulnerable in small sample sizes as opposed to larger ones.

Is it sad that I run all of your posts regarding statistics through the Stephen Hawking filter just to add some emotion to them?

I understand statistics. I also understand how to watch the game and use my eyes to see where our failures were. You lack the latter.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Then who is the best team, this year?

If it's those guys in Gainesville sitting at home and not in Omaha, then that's news to them.

Why? The may know it and be kicking themselves.

But you're the guy who thinks Fresno State was the best team in 2008.

 

[BWCD]

If it's all on the players, though - couldn't we save some scratch by just hiring me to manage them?

More nonsense to cover for your extreme incompetence.

No because you'd suck and we would never even get to Omaha.

You're assuming I'd be worse than Morris. You don't "know" that.

*cue the "does not compute" error from Fister Roboto*

 

[Brian Piccolo]

I understand statistics.

And yet you think that the most imperfect playoff system imaginable somehow crowns the best team every year.

Laughable.

 

[BWCD]

Then who is the best team, this year?

If it's those guys in Gainesville sitting at home and not in Omaha, then that's news to them.

Why? The may know it and be kicking themselves.

But you're the guy who thinks Fresno State was the best team in 2008.

If they were the best, they wouldn't be at home with games still to be played.

THERE is the flaw in your logic, homes.

 

[BWCD]

I understand statistics.

And yet you think that the most imperfect playoff system imaginable somehow crowns the best team every year.

Laughable.

Within the system we have, the national champ is the best team. You don't like the system? Then whine elsewhere. Your likes/dislikes have no bearing on whether or not the CWS changes their system.

Again, whining with no solution.

 

[BWCD]

Enjoy your evening of whacking it to spreadsheets, Fister Roboto.

I'm outta here.