The Past Decade: Revealed

[Brian Piccolo]

Go on. Do tell. Tell us again how impressive the last three post-seasons have been.

We got to Omaha in the last two.

Doing exactly what we should have done and what I predicted and you inevitably predicted against.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

That Jay Johnson might be putting a CWS trophy in the UA athletic department lobby? I know, that's a bad thing.

No it's just a comical thing.

As if we needed more proof how goofy the CWS is and how unpredictable and random it all is.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Go on. Do tell. Tell us again how impressive the last three post-seasons have been.

We got to Omaha in the last two.

Doing exactly what we should have done and what I predicted and you inevitably predicted against.

Too bad the whole "what we should have done" thing becomes "gee, this is so random" when we inevitably lose to a #2 at home or a #2 in Omaha, all while we are a #1 seed.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

That Jay Johnson might be putting a CWS trophy in the UA athletic department lobby? I know, that's a bad thing.

No it's just a comical thing.

As if we needed more proof how goofy the CWS is and how unpredictable and random it all is.

NCAA championships are comical? Goofy? Random? Unpredictable?

Except in 1999 and 2001, right?

 

[Brian Piccolo]

As long as you continue to use the regular season to defend the post-season, you will show that you don't understand what's going on here.

I'll always use 56 games over 8.

You still don't understand randomness. So you're not qualified to be telling anybody what they don't understand.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

We came from behind to beat someone like Georgia Tech or Pittsburgh? That's what we're celebrating? That's the proof that we have a really great program?

You're simply unhinged.

I make a statement of fact to refute a silly comment by somebody and this is what I get.

Somehow I was 'celebrating' it?

I was merely stating a fact.

I know you hate those things like poison.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

As long as you continue to use the regular season to defend the post-season, you will show that you don't understand what's going on here.

I'll always use 56 games over 8.

You still don't understand randomness. So you're not qualified to be telling anybody what they don't understand.

And I don't care what you think I understand. You're the guy trying to make everyone believe that we "do what we're supposed to do" when we win, but it always "random and unpredictable" when we lose. You admitted as much in this thread.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Too bad the whole "what we should have done" thing becomes "gee, this is so random" when we inevitably lose to a #2 at home or a #2 in Omaha, all while we are a #1 seed.

National seeds are merely seeded into Omaha.

We're 7-for-7 in that respect.

Something you will never acknowledge. Instead you'll whine about 2012.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

We came from behind to beat someone like Georgia Tech or Pittsburgh? That's what we're celebrating? That's the proof that we have a really great program?

You're simply unhinged.

I make a statement of fact to refute a silly comment by somebody and this is what I get.

Somehow I was 'celebrating' it?

I was merely stating a fact.

I know you hate those things like poison.

It's a fact that has no bearing on the discussion. Losing EVERY YEAR in Omaha is the sign of a soft program. Saying that we came from behind against random regular season opponents means nothing.

And yes, you are celebrating it because you keep referring to it like Jim Morris' reputation depends on it.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Too bad the whole "what we should have done" thing becomes "gee, this is so random" when we inevitably lose to a #2 at home or a #2 in Omaha, all while we are a #1 seed.

National seeds are merely seeded into Omaha.

We're 7-for-7 in that respect.

Something you will never acknowledge. Instead you'll whine about 2012.

2012? We lost to a lower seeded team in 2016, 2014, and 2013. Facts, right?

 

[Brian Piccolo]

NCAA championships are comical? Goofy? Random? Unpredictable?

Except in 1999 and 2001, right?

I'm always amused by the number of questions the professional fanboy whiners ask. It's because they never have any answers. They always need someone else to explain it to them.

Yes. If Arizona wins the national championship it's random by definition since nobody predicted it or could have predicted it.

If the best team wins (Miami in 1999 and maybe 2001) then nothing needs to be explained. The result was as fair as can be. The # 1 overall seed won it in 1999. Nothing to see here.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

NCAA championships are comical? Goofy? Random? Unpredictable?

Except in 1999 and 2001, right?

I'm always amused by the number of questions the professional fanboy whiners ask. It's because they never have any answers. They always need someone else to explain it to them.

Yes. If Arizona wins the national championship it's random by definition since nobody predicted it or could have predicted it.

If the best team wins (Miami in 1999 and maybe 2001) then nothing needs to be explained. The result was as fair as can be. The # 1 overall seed won it in 1999. Nothing to see here.

So win a highly rated national seed Miami wins, then Omaha isn't random. No coin flips. The CWS is the same as the regular season. We were the best and we took care of business. We controlled it.

When a highly rated national seed Miami loses, then Omaha is random. Nothing we can do.

This is your argument.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

You're the guy trying to make everyone believe that we "do what we're supposed to do" when we win, but it always "random and unpredictable" when we lose.

Yeah a national seed is supposed to get to Omaha. If they don't it's a failure. We've done what we were supposed to do 7 out of 7 times.

If that national seed loses to lesser teams in Omaha that's random by definition since nobody predicted it and the odds were long.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Has Jim Morris ever just lost when he should have won? Is it possible for the Hecht shills to admit that?

 

[Brian Piccolo]

So win a highly rated national seed Miami wins, then Omaha isn't random. No coin flips.

The # 1 overall seed won so it wasn't unpredictable by any standard.

See?

You still don't understand randomness after 4 months debating it.

Embarrassing.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

If that national seed loses to lesser teams in Omaha that's random by definition since nobody predicted it and the odds were long.

YOU. REALLY. SAID. THAT.

If the better team loses, it's not because they played poorly in a big situation. It's because of randomness.

Holy sht I've seen it all.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

So win a highly rated national seed Miami wins, then Omaha isn't random. No coin flips.

The # 1 overall seed won so it wasn't unpredictable by any standard.

See?

You still don't understand randomness after 4 months debating it.

Embarrassing.

Oh, I get it:

When Jim Morris wins as the better team, it's all to his credit as a great manager.
When Jim Morris loses as the better team, there's nothing he can do about it because it's random.

Jim Morris is never at fault. He either wins, or it's random. Dude is undefeated when it's under his control.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

When a highly rated national seed Miami loses, then Omaha is random. Nothing we can do.

This is your argument.

Nobody predicted Miami and Florida to both go 0-2. Unpredictable. Random.

If Arizona wins it then it's laughably random.

If the # 1 overall seed wins it then it's not random. It was perfectly predictable.

It's sad watching you flail at something so simple.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

How did Jim Morris manage to overcome the randomness in 2001, and why can't he do it anymore?

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Has Jim Morris ever just lost when he should have won? Is it possible for the Hecht shills to admit that?

I've said this before. You're just being purposefully obtuse.

He's been a 1-seed 17 times.

He's failed to advance twice.

2012 and 2014.

Other than that his record is pretty much unimpeachable as the favorite.