Stephen Morris vs Florida St

[Consigliere]

Zone your thoughts?

(4 Games Through ACC Play)

47 Offensive Drives (this includes a few drives where we hold it before halftime or kill the clock to end the game)

12 Punts

10 Turnovers

96 Total Points (actual offensive points from Drives, a pick 6 does not count)

3 Missed FGs (all under 50 yards)

102:05 Time of Total Possession (out of 240 Total Minutes) or 42.5% of the game we're on offense

----------------------------------------------------------------

21% of the time we turn the ball over on offense

25% of the time we punt the ball

what is this..... another flawed stat that's suppose to mean something?

What is flawed? Those are the actual stats from the games during ACC play. Let's focus on the offense here, what are your thoughts?

how about u tell me ur point and i'll go from there......

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

 

[CANE4LIFE]

Zone your thoughts?

(4 Games Through ACC Play)

47 Offensive Drives (this includes a few drives where we hold it before halftime or kill the clock to end the game)

12 Punts

10 Turnovers

96 Total Points (actual offensive points from Drives, a pick 6 does not count)

3 Missed FGs (all under 50 yards)

102:05 Time of Total Possession (out of 240 Total Minutes) or 42.5% of the game we're on offense

----------------------------------------------------------------

21% of the time we turn the ball over on offense

25% of the time we punt the ball

what is this..... another flawed stat that's suppose to mean something?

What is flawed? Those are the actual stats from the games during ACC play. Let's focus on the offense here, what are your thoughts?

how about u tell me ur point and i'll go from there......

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

Think that about says it all right there. 2 picks a game on average. And those stats dont capture things like 3rd down conversions, which we have been terrible at.

 

[zone3cane]

Zone your thoughts?

(4 Games Through ACC Play)

47 Offensive Drives (this includes a few drives where we hold it before halftime or kill the clock to end the game)

12 Punts

10 Turnovers

96 Total Points (actual offensive points from Drives, a pick 6 does not count)

3 Missed FGs (all under 50 yards)

102:05 Time of Total Possession (out of 240 Total Minutes) or 42.5% of the game we're on offense

----------------------------------------------------------------

21% of the time we turn the ball over on offense

25% of the time we punt the ball

what is this..... another flawed stat that's suppose to mean something?

What is flawed? Those are the actual stats from the games during ACC play. Let's focus on the offense here, what are your thoughts?

how about u tell me ur point and i'll go from there......

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

you do know that all of this information is skewed right?

 

[Consigliere]

what is this..... another flawed stat that's suppose to mean something?

What is flawed? Those are the actual stats from the games during ACC play. Let's focus on the offense here, what are your thoughts?

how about u tell me ur point and i'll go from there......

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

you do know that all of this information is skewed right?

Please explain your thoughts. What is the skewed part, those are the stats.

 

[zone3cane]

What is flawed? Those are the actual stats from the games during ACC play. Let's focus on the offense here, what are your thoughts?

how about u tell me ur point and i'll go from there......

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

you do know that all of this information is skewed right?

Please explain your thoughts. What is the skewed part, those are the stats.

Well the time of possession statistic is definitely skewed, even though it shows Miami hasnt won the TOP battle at all it doesnt show that the reason why the TOP is at 42% is b/c Miami ran mostly in the UNC and WF games during the 4th quarter. It has nothing to do w/ extra opportunities for Morris or the offense.

It's skewed b/c UNC was the only bad performance from Morris in ACC play.... 4 of those 8 interceptions came in that game. 2 against GT but he still went 17/22 and 3 TDs. Any other QB that would be a good game even if it was Johnny Manziel or Jameis Winston. Stephen Morris didnt throw an interception against Wake Forest, the game was already over b/c of the defense when Morris threw his 1st and 2nd interception against FSU.

Also the TOP is skewed b/c it doesnt take in account the situation at the time.... Miami's offense ran the ball more against UNC and Wake that's why the TOP is even that close to 50/50 when that's actually not the case during the majority of the game.... Miami's defense couldnt get off the field at all against GT, WF, or FSU. Which means Miami's offense was constantly behind the 8 ball in those games except for the 2nd half of the GT game.

As far as Punts go what's ur point?.... this isnt Oregon. We punt for field position, the defense is suppose to get Morris the ball back but they dont.

The stats are skewed and mean nothing.

 

[Coach Macho]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****** tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

 

[Consigliere]

how about u tell me ur point and i'll go from there......

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

you do know that all of this information is skewed right?

Please explain your thoughts. What is the skewed part, those are the stats.

Well the time of possession statistic is definitely skewed, even though it shows Miami hasnt won the TOP battle at all it doesnt show that the reason why the TOP is at 42% is b/c Miami ran mostly in the UNC and WF games during the 4th quarter. It has nothing to do w/ extra opportunities for Morris or the offense.

It's skewed b/c UNC was the only bad performance from Morris in ACC play.... 4 of those 8 interceptions came in that game. 2 against GT but he still went 17/22 and 3 TDs. Any other QB that would be a good game even if it was Johnny Manziel or Jameis Winston. Stephen Morris didnt throw an interception against Wake Forest, the game was already over b/c of the defense when Morris threw his 1st and 2nd interception against FSU.

Also the TOP is skewed b/c it doesnt take in account the situation at the time.... Miami's offense ran the ball more against UNC and Wake that's why the TOP is even that close to 50/50 when that's actually not the case during the majority of the game.... Miami's defense couldnt get off the field at all against GT, WF, or FSU. Which means Miami's offense was constantly behind the 8 ball in those games except for the 2nd half of the GT game.

As far as Punts go what's ur point?.... this isnt Oregon. We punt for field position, the defense is suppose to get Morris the ball back but they dont.

The stats are skewed and mean nothing.

I stopped reading after the TOP. Were on defense more than offense. You misunderstood clearly. Our offense cant stand on the field so....we cant score. The offense is bad and this shows that your unable to grasp this simple concept. 10 turnovers in ACC play.

 

[skyman]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****er tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

Yep, my seat was on that end of the field, had a good view of it. Not sure if he didnt get his head around quick enough and was surprised the ball was on him soo quick. Only explanation you can come up with. Coley is a well coordinated kid, he didnt have to leave his feet, he didnt have to stick one hand out. He could of run through the ball and got six. Only thing I can see is the ball got on him quicker than he thought. He is a freshman but he is supposed to be big time, he needs to make that play. Throw was good.

 

[dookie blaylock]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****er tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

did no one else notice that walford was wide open on that same play? go to 4:55 on the video. he ran alone for 15 yards and morris didn't even look at him.

 

[zone3cane]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****er tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

did no one else notice that walford was wide open on that same play? go to 4:55 on the video. he ran alone for 15 yards and morris didn't even look at him.

look how stupid this argument is.... Coley misses a wide open pass but now it's Morris's fault b/c Walford was "more" open.

S. Coley was open for a TD thats who u go for 1st, what about this cant u comprehend?... it's blame Morris for any and everything on this board. Walford got his touches let it go.

If Coley catches that pass, the score wouldve been 21-28 which wouldnt have mattered b/c FSU wouldve scored again and again anyway.

 

[zone3cane]

I think my thoughts are clear as day. (This is just about ACC Play)

Our offense is turning the ball over way too much and not scoring enough. I think our kicker has some issues and should be hitting these FGs (especially in the low 40s) to help them out. I think most of our problems stem from our QB play. Since ACC play has started he has thrown 8 Interceptions to his 6 touchdowns. This is not going to cut it. I think the main thing saving this offense is our rushing attack (see below)

Here is what our QB is averaging in ACC Play: 17 for 28 for 257 Yards, 1.5 TDs and 2 INTs.

Further evidencing this point of QB issues, here is our rushing stats from ACC play

Total: 145 Carries for 744 Yards and 6 TDs with 2 Fumbles

Per Game: 36 Carries for 186 Yards 1.5 TDs and .5 TOs

In addition, we have not lost a fumble in the last 3 games. I think if our offense is going to continue turning the ball over and is unable to score points, we will be hurting bad.

you do know that all of this information is skewed right?

Please explain your thoughts. What is the skewed part, those are the stats.

Well the time of possession statistic is definitely skewed, even though it shows Miami hasnt won the TOP battle at all it doesnt show that the reason why the TOP is at 42% is b/c Miami ran mostly in the UNC and WF games during the 4th quarter. It has nothing to do w/ extra opportunities for Morris or the offense.

It's skewed b/c UNC was the only bad performance from Morris in ACC play.... 4 of those 8 interceptions came in that game. 2 against GT but he still went 17/22 and 3 TDs. Any other QB that would be a good game even if it was Johnny Manziel or Jameis Winston. Stephen Morris didnt throw an interception against Wake Forest, the game was already over b/c of the defense when Morris threw his 1st and 2nd interception against FSU.

Also the TOP is skewed b/c it doesnt take in account the situation at the time.... Miami's offense ran the ball more against UNC and Wake that's why the TOP is even that close to 50/50 when that's actually not the case during the majority of the game.... Miami's defense couldnt get off the field at all against GT, WF, or FSU. Which means Miami's offense was constantly behind the 8 ball in those games except for the 2nd half of the GT game.

As far as Punts go what's ur point?.... this isnt Oregon. We punt for field position, the defense is suppose to get Morris the ball back but they dont.

The stats are skewed and mean nothing.

I stopped reading after the TOP. Were on defense more than offense. You misunderstood clearly. Our offense cant stand on the field so....we cant score. The offense is bad and this shows that your unable to grasp this simple concept. 10 turnovers in ACC play.

U cant comprehend the fact that Miami's defense has been more problematic to our offense then any other person or concept related to this team.

 

[dookie blaylock]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****er tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

did no one else notice that walford was wide open on that same play? go to 4:55 on the video. he ran alone for 15 yards and morris didn't even look at him.

look how stupid this argument is.... Coley misses a wide open pass but now it's Morris's fault b/c Walford was "more" open.

S. Coley was open for a TD thats who u go for 1st, what about this cant u comprehend?... it's blame Morris for any and everything on this board. Walford got his touches let it go.

If Coley catches that pass, the score wouldve been 21-28 which wouldnt have mattered b/c FSU wouldve scored again and again anyway.

i'm not making an argument about coley. he should have caught the ball, no excuses. that was an awful drop and morris threw a great ball. but i am also saying that there was a wide open tight end right in front of morris' face and he didn't even look at him.

 

[Consigliere]

you do know that all of this information is skewed right?

Please explain your thoughts. What is the skewed part, those are the stats.

Well the time of possession statistic is definitely skewed, even though it shows Miami hasnt won the TOP battle at all it doesnt show that the reason why the TOP is at 42% is b/c Miami ran mostly in the UNC and WF games during the 4th quarter. It has nothing to do w/ extra opportunities for Morris or the offense.

It's skewed b/c UNC was the only bad performance from Morris in ACC play.... 4 of those 8 interceptions came in that game. 2 against GT but he still went 17/22 and 3 TDs. Any other QB that would be a good game even if it was Johnny Manziel or Jameis Winston. Stephen Morris didnt throw an interception against Wake Forest, the game was already over b/c of the defense when Morris threw his 1st and 2nd interception against FSU.

Also the TOP is skewed b/c it doesnt take in account the situation at the time.... Miami's offense ran the ball more against UNC and Wake that's why the TOP is even that close to 50/50 when that's actually not the case during the majority of the game.... Miami's defense couldnt get off the field at all against GT, WF, or FSU. Which means Miami's offense was constantly behind the 8 ball in those games except for the 2nd half of the GT game.

As far as Punts go what's ur point?.... this isnt Oregon. We punt for field position, the defense is suppose to get Morris the ball back but they dont.

The stats are skewed and mean nothing.

I stopped reading after the TOP. Were on defense more than offense. You misunderstood clearly. Our offense cant stand on the field so....we cant score. The offense is bad and this shows that your unable to grasp this simple concept. 10 turnovers in ACC play.

U cant comprehend the fact that Miami's defense has been more problematic to our offense then any other person or concept related to this team.

Agreed to disagree?

 

[zone3cane]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****er tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

did no one else notice that walford was wide open on that same play? go to 4:55 on the video. he ran alone for 15 yards and morris didn't even look at him.

look how stupid this argument is.... Coley misses a wide open pass but now it's Morris's fault b/c Walford was "more" open.

S. Coley was open for a TD thats who u go for 1st, what about this cant u comprehend?... it's blame Morris for any and everything on this board. Walford got his touches let it go.

If Coley catches that pass, the score wouldve been 21-28 which wouldnt have mattered b/c FSU wouldve scored again and again anyway.

i'm not making an argument about coley. he should have caught the ball, no excuses. that was an awful drop and morris threw a great ball. but i am also saying that there was a wide open tight end right in front of morris' face and he didn't even look at him.

Still another *** response smh how pathetic.... "and morris didnt even look at him" well maybe b/c Coley had his receiver beat wtf r u talking about?

Morris "looked at" Walford all game, in that situation Miami was down 28-14 and needed to score points not satisfy ur urge for ur boyfriend Walford to get the ball more so he can juggle the ball the entire time.

 

[FullyERicht]

Zone is starting to sound like a Tebow fan, dismissing stats and blaming everyone us for the QBs shortcomings. The kid is average in every measurable way. he's like a pitcher who throws 100 mph, but has no secondary pitches, no location, and can't read the hitters.

 

[zone3cane]

Zone is starting to sound like a Tebow fan, dismissing stats and blaming everyone us for the QBs shortcomings. The kid is average in every measurable way. he's like a pitcher who throws 100 mph, but has no secondary pitches, no location, and can't read the hitters.

OH OK thanks for that far from true analogy.

 

[hoops156]

Zone is starting to sound like a Tebow fan, dismissing stats and blaming everyone us for the QBs shortcomings. The kid is average in every measurable way. he's like a pitcher who throws 100 mph, but has no secondary pitches, no location, and can't read the hitters.

OH OK thanks for that far from true analogy.

no its true

 

[zone3cane]

Zone is starting to sound like a Tebow fan, dismissing stats and blaming everyone us for the QBs shortcomings. The kid is average in every measurable way. he's like a pitcher who throws 100 mph, but has no secondary pitches, no location, and can't read the hitters.

OH OK thanks for that far from true analogy.

no its true

NOPE

 

[Dwinstitles]

Play calling was awesome in the 1st half.

And that pass down the sideline to Coley could've been caught. That ****er tried to catch it with one hand. That pass was fine.

I think the talent caught up to UM and Coley was scared to pull the trigger cuz SM was rattled, I think JC is awesome at recruiting and learning on the job also but his cieling is great for the future. Is he perfect no will he make mistakes yes but thats what happens when u higher a noob.

 

[Dwinstitles]

Zone is starting to sound like a Tebow fan, dismissing stats and blaming everyone us for the QBs shortcomings. The kid is average in every measurable way. he's like a pitcher who throws 100 mph, but has no secondary pitches, no location, and can't read the hitters.

OH OK thanks for that far from true analogy.

no its true

NOPE

Hes better than average and has a top level arm but he doesnt have that it factor IMO he is what he is. Hes a 3 star kid AG inherited and is developing and masking alot of flaWS