- Joined
- Mar 18, 2016
- Messages
- 801
That's a decent time...but in no way is 49.5 a national elite time...
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
It would be best to research it and find out like I did that 49.50 is the national elite standard for 400m in high school. Do not be one of the modern day people that is a legend in their own mind--We had enough of those crackpots come out in the last election on both sides. A few clicks of the computer key and it is there.
Standards
Now let's not get offended just because I don't agree with you "elite" standard. Your link says "Standard." Nothing about national elite standards. You use elite like it's going out of style. Everything that's good to you is elite. I'm not saying a 49.5 is slow, but it is not elite. Let's not try to be the expert about something you probably have no real first hand knowledge or experience in. I did run the 400 in high school, high 49's low 50's. Those times didn't get me, or any one else any where near the podium. A 49.5 in majority of track meets or state meets with good competition won't even get you in the top 5, or 5th maybe.
elite are the guys running 47's and below in my opinion. But it's just that...my opinion. A standard is just that, the standard. To be elite you don't achieve the standard, you go way above that. Here's what elite looks like...and it's no where near the standard.
High School - Men's 400 Meters Rankings
I have some knowledge after retiring as a HS track coach for 18 years and the last 12 at a JUCO. It seem,s you appear to be offended with the remarks. The "Mile Split Standards" are more or less accepted as the "accepted standard" for HS times as they have literally posted the results for decades and have a solid base of such figures for events as a benchmark.. JUCO and Collegiate times fall under a different standards.
For high school players I saw where Harley had a 21.88--200m into a relative strong head win just recently equivalent to just over 21.4 when adjusted for no wind.
This 400 thing shows he has endurance in a long sprint and is not a huge factor in explosion or short sprint speed. How many times in there a false start at 400m as compared to 60m or 100m?
Often as a track coach ballers of many sports (football, baseball, basketball, soccer, etc} wanting to develop "anaerobic" endurance would choose to run the 400m as a means of developing that.
I wonder what Harley could do if he totally dedicated himself to 400m. Maybe not even national class but certainly better that the 49 something he ran. Look at Tyrese Cooped is best 100m is a excellent but not national level time of 10.5. He excels in the longer sprints with 400m being his best. Harley needs the short "separation" bursts in football.
Last edited: