PSU Cane
Junior
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 5,938
The problem is talent and reps. It's hard to get enough reps for the DL reading every type of block and then every decision a RB makes on top of that on a limited schedule (unlike the NFL). To compound that, our NT is a senior who has practiced (time wise) the reps of a sophomore in this system. Dude was missing time every year that was critical to him getting the reps needed to play effectively in this system. That's why Stanford under Fangio was succeeding with it: they had guys who had five years worth of reps starting, who were built for that system. We have a 4-3 DE playing 3-4 DE, a 2-star last minute addition in OP, and a senior who hasn't practiced or played a full season in like 3 years.
These aren't excuses for us to keep the system. The system is based on the idea that we need to run it b/c simpler methods can be exposed by elite QBs. But in college it is rare to EVER play a QB that requires such complexity thrown at him. It's a waste of time to run this kind of defense in college. But don't make idiotic statements or inferences that our coaches don't know what pattern matching is, or how to properly coach 2 gap DL. It honestly comes off as immature, jealous, and foolish.
Agree with the bolded.
But, are you saying Fangio ran a predominant 2-gap system?
I'm not saying the coaches are coaching it that way but they are allowing the players to play it that way. That part is not lack of talent. Whatever is going on just isn't working and it's obvious on tape when our entire Dline stands up at the snap and wait to take on the contact as opposed to initiating it....not to mention that when contact is made these kids are not good are using their hands or disengaging. You would think by now that you would have seen at least marginal improvement. If anything, i have seen Porter and Pierre regress a bit.