QuadCityCane
Redshirt Freshman
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 226
The reality is that there are a finite number of combination patterns teams are going to run in these scenarios. Smash concept. Flood concept. 2 Verticals. Vertical with a drag underneath. Etc. Their chances of successful execution would all be greatly reduced if we didn't combine what we do back there with playing contain up front. It's hard as **** to get a jump on some of these combination routes if the WR has an extra two yards to test your cushion.
I might've asked you this before, and perhaps it could be its own thread, but what do you think the paradigm is for Golden/MDO's defense?
What do you think this defense looks like when it's operating how they want it?
All I can really say is we want to be "multiple" but philosophically, I'm not sure. The weird thing about Golden is he says all the right things in interviews, but the product looks different on the field. ***Cue car salesman joke***.
But seriously. He talks about getting TFLs, getting off the field on 3rd down, eliminating "cupcake" throws, etc... but we keep seeing it. Either those things aren't that important, or for whatever reason (coaching, talent, etc...) he's unable to produce those results with this group of players.
They want all those things I'm sure because they have done it before with other defenses. I illustrated most of this in my extra long blog post but if you look at every miami defense from 2011 and before. They all had at least average+ strong safety play. Now this isnt to say its just the players because it is not. The fact the coaches over the last two years have used a revolving door at the safety position is causing them to play and look confused, which then causes the coaches to not believe in them, so they then dont use them as much to help protect the linebackers. One giant circle of failure.
Fix the safety philosophy by finding 1 and sticking with them and most of the problems on defense will go away. Guys like Jo Jo(2011, Goldens first year) and Ray Ray(shannons last year) were not world beaters at SS but they were good enough to help produce defenses that gave up 20 points a game. Every SS for Miami 2011 and before finished in the top 4 in tackles, just like most average or better defenses in college, in 2012 Miamis best SS was 10th and in 2013 they are 13th in tackles.
I'm still not completely following this rationale. Fixing the Safety position (an obvious disaster) will not fix our core issues of DL style and the broader issue of allowing offenses to dictate our defense.
Able,
To answer your question, I have no idea what the ideal version of this would be. I don't think we're anywhere close because my brain and gut have gotten together to hope that Golden/D'Ono wouldn't play this style with better players.
I already explained all of this and I used tons of examples of different defenses, some with good/bad lines, some with good/bad backers, low sacks, ton of sacks, etc to show that the one constant in average or better defense was safety play. Obviously safety does not fix the dline issues, but it definitely allows you to be more aggressive on defense instead of allowing offenses to dictate to us. Thus allowing you to help the weaker points of your D which in turn makes for better defense.