On3 updated 300

Advertisement
Does this quote ring a bell?


“They do not yet have nationwide coverage. The 20 or so websites that they "started" with are heavily skewed to SEC schools”

This is the very definition of catering to their subscriber base.


No it's not, dopey. It's the very definition OF A START-UP. Your analysis is as bad as on3's.

As I have stated, over and over again, on3 may someday prove to be a valuable resource. That day is not today.

I have NO PROBLEMS with on3 STARTING OUT by focusing on the southeast. I have a problem with on3 being included in national consensus rankings when they are limited to one region of the country.

You are absolutely clueless on "catering to their subscriber base". You know nothing, Jon Snow.
 
No it's not, dopey. It's the very definition OF A START-UP. Your analysis is as bad as on3's.

As I have stated, over and over again, on3 may someday prove to be a valuable resource. That day is not today.

I have NO PROBLEMS with on3 STARTING OUT by focusing on the southeast. I have a problem with on3 being included in national consensus rankings when they are limited to one region of the country.

You are absolutely clueless on "catering to their subscriber base". You know nothing, Jon Snow.

Cry more.
 
Advertisement
I do just want to understand how you have a 5* consensus player...yet no 5* on any board
Screenshot_20220718_122620_com.android.chrome.jpg
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
lol what the **** kinda thread did I just walk into? What site am I on?

a-pond-full-of-alligators-W40NJW.jpg



Get hold of yourselves and trust the coaches.
 
Advertisement
Most of the players committed to UM or CBed to UM fell precipitously. No bias there. LOL
Honestly it was hot or miss. Some dropped a ton and some rose a ton. Look at Bonsu. In 247 he is a 3 star not near the top 247. Here he is top 150. All that matters is we are after a lot of guys on all the lists.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top