forums

On3 updated 300

Advertisement
Bashing because one, they have done ZERO for credibility and reasoning. Mouth breathers may eat that up, but how the **** can anyone support ot better yet argue they have a service that does anything correct? That's criminal. And if I was a top flight recruit that has been **** on they would get ZERO interviews.
 
Advertisement
Two things. First, if you think these guys are unfair clowns, then ignore their ratings. There's no reason to both complain they ***** us and look at their rankings. Second, and maybe this just goes for 247, but don't they say part of the rating is based on expected development? If so, it makes sense to think a team with a proven record of NFL pics would be expected to better develop a kid than without. And miss me with stats from the early 2000s, we're talking recent success. Yes, Mario has a good record, but not here, not yet. If I weren't a Cane and were making rankings, I'd assume UGA is a better developer of talent right now than Miami until proven otherwise.

Remember all those years we were supposed to face VT for the Big East Championship and possible national title, and they always sh*t the bed at some point? Every year, I refused to believe in them until they proved it. Same with fsu, until Bobby proved it, you always knew they'd lose to us.

So lets go prove it, then in a few years we can see if this is all nonsense or not.
 
1658158770532.gif
 
Advertisement
RedPill Stepdad said:
this is about to turn into an On3 bashing thread. it was only a decade ago when the Rivals subscribers were saying the same thing about 247.
Click to expand...
It took years before 247 rankings were anywhere near respected. It will take On3 a while before anyone respects their opinion. Especially since they claim to have a numeric algorithm that determines player rank.
 
kryptonite said:
Two things. First, if you think these guys are unfair clowns, then ignore their ratings. There's no reason to both complain they ***** us and look at their rankings. Second, and maybe this just goes for 247, but don't they say part of the rating is based on expected development? If so, it makes sense to think a team with a proven record of NFL pics would be expected to better develop a kid than without. And miss me with stats from the early 2000s, we're talking recent success. Yes, Mario has a good record, but not here, not yet. If I weren't a Cane and were making rankings, I'd assume UGA is a better developer of talent right now than Miami until proven otherwise.

Remember all those years we were supposed to face VT for the Big East Championship and possible national title, and they always sh*t the bed at some point? Every year, I refused to believe in them until they proved it. Same with fsu, until Bobby proved it, you always knew they'd lose to us.

So lets go prove it, then in a few years we can see if this is all nonsense or not.
Click to expand...
Post missing some valid points. UF has a chunk of highly ranked kids, how successful have they been with 3 coaches in last 5 years? Also these ****** rankings factor into other sites so you can't say just ignore it.
 
Advertisement
cway313 said:
Post missing some valid points. UF has a chunk of highly ranked kids, how successful have they been with 3 coaches in last 5 years? Also these ****** rankings factor into other sites so you can't say just ignore it.
Click to expand...
Fair point about the gater. I still stand by the other thing. If everybody gets so mad and thinks it's all BS, why look at them? If these guys are playing games then their rankings don't mean anything, they're just random numbers.
 
Advertisement
cway313 said:
No he was 155 in ON3, 51 is composite.
Click to expand...
Ahh, ok. Got ya! I see the different headings now. So for Rashada (see below) On3 is not even close to the other services in terms of rankings. Their one outlier changes all rankings in this example for all of the services.

The consensus ranking should not account for the lowest and highest ranking per player. Like grading on a curve. ON3 is so far off from the others. So he would avg to be around 30th. Not 50th.

1658159415813.png
 
PIPO said:
Ahh, ok. Got ya! I see the different headings now. So for Rashada (see below) On3 is not even close to the other services in terms of rankings. Their one outlier changes all rankings in this example for all of the services.

The consensus ranking should not account for the lowest and highest ranking per player. Like grading on a curve. ON3 is so far off from the others. So he would avg to be around 30th. Not 50th.

View attachment 199246
Click to expand...
Exactly but it's why saying, just ignore them makes no sense.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top