Robinson not a 4*?
https://rivals.yahoo.com/miami/foot...inson-82014;_ylt=AlKMU89rsPLqBZVZY6WNE0dDspB4
Linder was highly recruited but not by everyone?....What..? What did I say? you don't even make sense
Porter had offers from the big 3, Clemson, Tennesee, Michigan
Cornelius was iirc committed to FSU at one point and had offers by other major programs
Rodgers had offers from UF, UGA, Nebraska Notre Dame Ohio State, Tennesse
Some of you guys make my friggin head hurt and on top of it you have the stones to say people are fabricating things when I'm providing LINKS to pages that clearly state that YOU are the one fabricating things
Robinson (39), Porter (60), Wheeler (21), Gilbert (92), Cornelius (61) were all composite 3*, none of which were in the top 20 on their position. They all pretty much performed like your average 3* player.
Henderson, Linder, maybe Clements were the only players that "everyone" wanted.
Those players had offers from A LOT of MAJOR programs. I don't care what their composite ranking was. LOOK AT THEIR OFFERS! You're arguing semantics here, chief. You are not arguing the point.
At the very least, coaches at a school like Temple or Duke for that matter would murder to have players of this caliber. Where are the Jarretts? The Wilkersons? There is toooooo much fail on that list for it to be solely on the players. Like I said (and like you weren't able to understand) coaches at a lot of major programs wanted these very "untalented" guys.
side note* I only mentioned Wheeler because he outplayed our starting C who was a HS all american. Clearly there was something there.
So you make a case for bad development and bring up Wheeler which would be good development.
Look I'm not defending any coaches but its not true that Robinson, Porter, Cornelius, etc were top shelf national recruits.
I was able to understand everything, you said everyone wanted these guys which wasn't true. Now you can change your argument if you want. Not to mention this staff didn't even recruit these guys.
Again, you're arguing semantics. You know what my point was. Stop creating straw men just to play contrarian. The guys I mentioned were guys that received offers from a lot of major programs. They were offered by a lot of the major programs because they sucked????
Clearly, you do not understand hyperbole. You've got to be mentally handicapped if you're focusing your entire argument on that, especially when I went in detail, player-by-player, with evidence to my point that these guys were talented when they got here.
Your last statement is laughable. Implying this staff didn't want these kids? The same staff that offered Armbrister, Darius Smith, brought in Mike Williams, etc. C'mon man. This staff would have killed to have these players at Temple. But hey, you might be right, because with the offers some of these kids had they would have never given Temple a second look.