Match made in heaven. Never been a more perfect philosophical fit for this program and its recruiting base than Chip.
Whitlock was right about Folden being a fraud. Hopefully he's right on this.
He's not going to bring that Oregon, 3 DL in a Frog stance, D with him is he?
I know this is a joke, but it spurred some thought in me, so I wanted to see if Chip's teams really were trash defensively, or if that is a myth based on his offense.
What I decided to do was calculate the yards per play for each year that Chip was the HC at Oregon. His defenses were as follows:
2009: 12th in yards per play (4.56), and 1.22 standard deviations above the mean.
2010: 11th in yards per play (4.67), and 1.27 standard deviations above the mean.
2011: 35th in yards per play (5.07), and 0.61 standard deviations above the mean.
2012: 26th in yards per play (4.94), and 0.94 standard deviations above the mean.
For a point of reference, I wanted to compare this to Butch's 1999 team. This gave Butch time to recruit a complete team and field his defense. Here is how that season turned out for Butch:
1999: 12th in yards per play (4.37), and 1.28 standard deviations above the mean.
Given the increase in offense in college football, I wanted to calculate the standard deviations to understand how they compare in relation to their peers. Chip was right with Butch's best defense in two of his seasons, and under 5.00 yards per play in all but one season (which is outstanding).
Chip Kelly is a better option than Butch Davis. There isn't a big debate that can be made to the contrary if you are going off of objective measurements. If you add subjective elements such as knowing the school, area, energizing the fanbase etc. maybe you could make a compelling argument. Chip fields very good defenses, and record-breaking offenses that actually fit S. Florida perfectly. He also is the type of personality that fits with this fanbase and this area.
Of all possible options, Chip Kelly is the best one.