Fightinibis
Junior
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,106
Bilas, who also is a lawyer. said on Finebaum a few minutes ago, that soliciting funds for a player, especially one who arrives at your school, is an NCAA infraction that accrues also to the head coach. This was said in the context of University 6 which is Lousiville. He said that that allegation was the worst in the college cases. If there is a coach 3, and he made the request and it is proved, he will be fired and probably be given a show cause. Program implications are unknown.
That's kind of the key here to me.."especially one who arrives at your school"...
I'm definitely no expert on the subject, but what it appears they have is 2 Defendants discussing a coach basically urging THEM to do something illegal, then, ultimately....it never occurs, rather, the illegal act occurs elsewhere.
So, is conspiracy to commit a crime (that never occurs) good enough without any other evidence beyond a wiretap of 2 presumed guilty individuals? Hmmm...sounds weak as **** to me.
UM
It may sound weak but burden of proof with NCAA is not the same as proof required in a courtroom
No, it is weak, even by NCAA standards. Loads of NCAA investigations into Auburn and many others had a boat load of witnesses that saw money change hands, and they ended with "no paper trail"...and eye witnesses are not enough.
Now if you want to have a discussion about how the NCAA hates UM to the core and treat us different, no argument from me.
UM