Ibis Wingz
All-ACC
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 6,656
This is the way to go. Offer this kid and offer Hollomon's brother. Then we will get Hollomon and Lingard. If we do this with every five star kid, we can get 12 five star kids every year.
black manipulation matters
Kid doesn't want money or cars, he simply wants his cousin (who can ball) to come along for the ride.
That's money. UM costs about $50K per year now. Plus housing and food. He wants UM to give the cousin who isn't cut out for this level all that money.
Yeah its 60k/yr....but at least it would be split into 2 players (for Avantae too). But still 30k/yr for 4 years is 120k. So yeah he basically is asking for a **** load of money.
But, This kid is probably better and more worthy of a scholarship than quite a few players currently on our team.
black manipulation matters
Kid doesn't want money or cars, he simply wants his cousin (who can ball) to come along for the ride.
That's money. UM costs about $50K per year now. Plus housing and food. He wants UM to give the cousin who isn't cut out for this level all that money.
Lingard is worth two scholarships. Tweed said the kid is willing to walk-on and if that's the case than there is no real reason not to offer that.
If he's willing to walk on then there's no need to discuss any of this. Anyone can try out for the team. We have all kinds of terrible walk-ons on the team. Walk-ons have to pay tuition though.
Chise, you have stated your opinion numerous times already, I hear you loud and clear sir.
Why all the negative comments and names towards the young man?
Kid doesn't want money or cars, he simply wants his cousin (who can ball) to come along for the ride.
That's money. UM costs about $50K per year now. Plus housing and food. He wants UM to give the cousin who isn't cut out for this level all that money.
We need players. We have scholarships available. He can play multiple positions of need. How is this being viewed as a negative?
It's a negative because he's an FIU/FAU level recruit. Look at his offers. You're saying he's a baller, but no bigtime P5 schools agree with you. In your initial post, you say it's ALMOST guaranteed Lingard comes if we sign the Group 5 level cousin.
"Almost" is a very important qualifier.
What's to stop the cousin from transferring out of UM to Ohio Taint next year if Lingard decides he wants to go there and Urb makes the deal at that point?
Not too many coaches are going to be gullible enough to offer the gimpy cousin a year ahead of Lingard signing. If they were in the same class it would make a lot more sense.
****, Rick could even say, "Sign with us in 2018, and your cousin Tiny Tim can transfer in if he wants. He'll have a scholarship waiting as soon as you sign yours." That's how you play this if you're smart.
If he's willing to walk on, he's probably willing to sit out a year.
This is the way to go. Offer this kid and offer Hollomon's brother. Then we will get Hollomon and Lingard. If we do this with every five star kid, we can get 12 five star kids every year.
Kid doesn't want money or cars, he simply wants his cousin (who can ball) to come along for the ride.
That's money. UM costs about $50K per year now. Plus housing and food. He wants UM to give the cousin who isn't cut out for this level all that money.
Lingard is worth two scholarships. Tweed said the kid is willing to walk-on and if that's the case than there is no real reason not to offer that.
If he's willing to walk on then there's no need to discuss any of this. Anyone can try out for the team. We have all kinds of terrible walk-ons on the team. Walk-ons have to pay tuition though.
this attitude is why we play checkers not chess... its cutthroat out there. offer a job to the parent. get the brother in school. get the cousin a track schollie. find a way. ASKING HIM TO WALK ON is losers mentality
You know everyone on our board and all the guys who are willing to come here? You are certain we're not going to sign high level guys this cycle?The object of recruiting is to fill out your roster as well. YOU say we're not looking to add "FIU level guys", but fact of the matter is, the guys YOU think should be here don't want to be here. LJ is a kid that wants to be here & his cousin Lo is simply trying to push for his cousin to get an offer, be it football or track. (which other schools have already offered).
Risky since he's 2017. Tweed what are your thoughts?
Thoughts on what sir?
Risky since he's 2017. Tweed what are your thoughts?
Thoughts on what sir?
Offering him.
Chise, this thread was started back in October sir. The "almost" was something that I wasn't sure of at the time. That uncertainty has since been cleared up.
Chise, this thread was started back in October sir. The "almost" was something that I wasn't sure of at the time. That uncertainty has since been cleared up.
So you're guaranteeing if we sign this Lawerence Coleman kid the two five stars will sign on the dotted line for Miami when the time comes? That's a big call.
What will it take to get the staff to offer Coleman?The object of recruiting is to fill out your roster as well. YOU say we're not looking to add "FIU level guys", but fact of the matter is, the guys YOU think should be here don't want to be here. LJ is a kid that wants to be here & his cousin Lo is simply trying to push for his cousin to get an offer, be it football or track. (which other schools have already offered).
What will it take to get the staff to offer Coleman?The object of recruiting is to fill out your roster as well. YOU say we're not looking to add "FIU level guys", but fact of the matter is, the guys YOU think should be here don't want to be here. LJ is a kid that wants to be here & his cousin Lo is simply trying to push for his cousin to get an offer, be it football or track. (which other schools have already offered).
If that's what it takes to get Lo, why don't they just get it done?
If we take this kid this year and Lingard doesn't sign in 2018 we aren't stuck with Coleman for four years. We can drop him if he doesn't perform in practice. It's a win-win to take him.
Best case scenario is it lands us two future five stars and he's a contributor. Worst case we don't get the two five stars and we tell the kid to transfer after a year.