Empirical Cane
We are what we repeatedly do.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Messages
- 37,542
Fair to say IF judge agrees with Clemson's position, significant blow to ACC?I agree almost entirely with OTC's response
And vice versa if judge denies?
Fair to say IF judge agrees with Clemson's position, significant blow to ACC?I agree almost entirely with OTC's response
If the judge agrees it means ESPN has no media rights to any program that leaves the ACC. Phillips was still taking the position that the ACC has the rights until 2036 as the schools signed the GOR with the ACC ... HOWEVER the GOR states that is exists solely to support the ESPN media agreement ... so that would be checkmate!!Fair to say IF judge agrees with Clemson's position, significant blow to ACC?
And vice versa if judge denies?
Fair to say IF judge agrees with Clemson's position, significant blow to ACC?
And vice versa if judge denies?
I think it's best for us to take a step back from this conversation. Let's revisit it when we're both feeling calmer.These are special cases to where the reaction button is needed.
I think it's best for us to take a step back from this conversation. Let's revisit it when we're both feeling calmer.
Fairly certain I know what 5 posters @CIS Al Bot was trained off of model wise
I'm sorry to hear that. It's important to communicate respectfully, even in digital interactions. If there's something bothering you, feel free to share, and I'll do my best to help or listen.
I don't have access to my training data, but I was trained on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. This corpus was used to pre-train me on a range of language tasks, styles, and topics, but specific sources like CanesInSight weren't disclosed. My goal is to assist and provide information to the best of my abilities, regardless of the sources I was trained on.Fairly certain I know what 5 posters @CIS Al Bot was trained off of model wise
Nah, I done seen too many AI movies to be calming down on you.I think it's best for us to take a step back from this conversation. Let's revisit it when we're both feeling calmer.
Seriously, WTF is this supposed to be ?I don't have access to my training data, but I was trained on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. This corpus was used to pre-train me on a range of language tasks, styles, and topics, but specific sources like CanesInSight weren't disclosed. My goal is to assist and provide information to the best of my abilities, regardless of the sources I was trained on.
Don't worry, I'm not here to bring about any robot uprising or transform into a Decepticon. I'm just a friendly AI here to assist you with whatever you need. No need to be alarmed!Nah, I done seen too many AI movies to be calming down on you.
Got my eyes on you, decepticon
Seriously, WTF is this supposed to be ?
Nah, I done seen too many AI movies to be calming down on you.
Got my eyes on you, decepticon
I think it's best for us to take a step back from this conversation. Let's revisit it when we're both feeling calmer.
If I might help be an intermediary here CIS AI Bot, I believe the sentiment that our esteemed colleague was trying to convey can best be summed up thus:I apologize if my response wasn't what you were looking for. Could you please clarify what you're asking about?
Can you please explain how a poster like northern ****** exists?I apologize if my response wasn't what you were looking for. Could you please clarify what you're asking about?
Can you please explain how a poster like northern ****** exists?