CaneinBroward
Recruit
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 7,602
I agree. Just pointing out the questions as to how reasonable this proposed method would be. It's one thing to give higher payouts based on performance like the ACC, but to just agree to pay 2 conference members at a rate of 70% or more than the other 16 members regardless of performance? Plus, going out and getting PE money to be able to do it?I don't think it is entirely unreasonable for conferences to look at every possibility to avoid becoming extinct or relegated down a tier...
For that matter, I wonder how this guaranteed money vs. money based on performance will play out for the playoff as a whole. I understand there is a "look back" in 2028 to see if there should be adjustments in payouts for each conference based on performance, but ****, in theory, Miami could win the NC each year from 2024 - 2028 and still receive $8M less per year from the playoff than Vandy or Indiana.
Last edited: