- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 13,725
ACC! ACC! ACC!I think it should go that way if all three win. We want all three to win.
Am I doing that right?
ACC! ACC! ACC!I think it should go that way if all three win. We want all three to win.
Lol it's cool man. But I legit thought I missed out on a special week of football.Whoops that’s my bad should be 0
Heathers are normally good for face ******* and disposing after use and that's a scientific fact.Here comes heather with her bull****. “Should Georgia jump Miami if they beat Georgia tech”. No heather.
The Big12 winner is the forgotten team here.. they will grab a spot. They aren't accounted for on these rankings, but they will on the final rankings.
They're at 12 but there's no Big12 team ranked in the top 12. So Clemson would get left out without moving up.Clemson is already sitting at #12, so beat USCe and wait.
I'm not sure if UGA loses a close game to Texas in the SECCG that the committee punishes them enough to drop from #7 to #12. I could still see them staying in front of Clemson with 3 losses.i think clemson would need texas to win out - giving UGA and A&M additional losses
if that happens, clemson beats USC, and Miami smu both win this weekend and the ACC title game is competitive, i can see 3 ACC getting in with 3 sec
If uga loses the seccg I believe they will get in with 3 lossesAnd there it is. You just heard the chair of the committee answering that staged question about teams with more losses than others. Flat out gave a precedent for 3 loss teams being in the top 12. It’s going to happen with at least one SEC team.
SMU has a legitimate gripe. One early season “good” loss. But my only true objection to those rankings is ND. They should at a minimum be the lowest ranked one loss team based on who they lost to.
After they lose to Auburn it'll be, "Well, 4 losses is a lot, but, well, Miami lost to Georgia Tech!"Thats my biggest gripe with the rankings is they keep handing Bama a lifeline
You good big dawgOh ****, you missed it.
Nvm.