My conversation with Gary Parrish
@doctordub20 2h2 hours ago
@GaryParrishCBS please explain Miami 9 spots behind UVA? Behind Utah, a team it beat by 20+ and Duke a team it beat by 11?
@GaryParrishCBS
@doctordub20 Miami has also lost to NC State by 16 and to Clemson by 11. And to Northeastern at home. The losses count too
@doctordub20 41m41 minutes ago
@GaryParrishCBS that's true, but I could easily flip it around and show all the "bad" losses by the teams ahead of Miami.
@doctordub20
@GaryParrishCBS miami has a better record, a better ACC record, is in first in the ACC, has an rpi of 7, etc. it's absurd to have them 12.
@GaryParrishCBS 38m38 minutes ago
@doctordub20 Again, there’s a smart way to argue for Miami. But you’re choosing the dumb way. The really, really dumb way.
@doctordub20 36m36 minutes ago
@GaryParrishCBS how so? Facts?
@doctordub20 37m37 minutes ago
@GaryParrishCBS I'm used to it. As long as their name is Miami and not Duke or ____, they're not getting the benefit of the doubt.
@GaryParrishCBS 35m35 minutes ago
@doctordub20 I’ll explain it in great detail on the podcast we record tonight. I’ll even mention you by name to ensure you don’t miss it.
This is complete insanity. First, you were completely respectful in your tweets and merely looking for an explanation, and he (apparently a respected journalist) responds with the "You're wrong -- I know better than you" approach?!?! Honestly, if you want to pretend that you are a journalist, then at least act like a professional.
But, here is insane part. Utah moved up from 19 to 9 in two days -- if this guy's mind, they were
#19 on Friday morning. Meanwhile, we stayed at 12. Yes, Utah had a nice win on Saturday at home against Arizona (his
#23 team), and Arizona stayed at
#23 . When we beat his
#7 Louisville at home, they drop 6 spots to 13, but we exactly where we were. Try to figure out that logic. In one case, the winner vaults up 10, while the loser remains put. In the other, the loses falls 7, but the winner remains put.
However, his points about Miami having bad losses should have already been baked into our
#12 ranking on Friday. So should have Utah's prior wins and losses (including to us). So, the results on Saturday should be the ONLY relevant factors in the ranking changes. Unless, of course, Parrish is admitting that his prior rankings of Utah (and Louisville) were wrong/off. In which case, why give any credence into what Parrish is saying, because he is just making guesses that don't appear to be based on anything, except his worthless thoughts of the day.