DJWilliams55
Junior
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 1,353
I LOVE the pic on the front page with Donna wearing the Swag hat.
Badassery....at its best.
Badassery....at its best.
And yet i got attacked all day for saying maybe the cooperation strategy we pursued wasnt an unmitigated success. I'd guess Donna Shalala herself regrets it, yet her sycophants here see her every action as beyond flawless.The thing that scares me the most is, the NCAA has no one to answer to. If the COI wants to **** us, they can.
They answer to the world and the rest of college football. And, the way they answer is that, if they **** us, no one will ever cooperate with an NCAA investigation again. There'd be no reason or incentive to do anything but stall, stonewall or outright lie.
But what good would an adversarial approach done right off the bat? And what harm has been done by cooperating up until this point?
I'm not sure how the outcome would have been any different if UM and Shalala had come out swinging like they have now. I'm not saying the course of cooperation is an "umitigated success", but I don't see how other courses of action would have been better to this point. They were cooperative up until the point they learned about the NCAA's malfeasance. Seems like a prudent approach to a situation to me.
Me too. Because of how she played it, we now get to wear the white hat. We may be the first school to have a president who engineered a situation where screaming foul against the NCAA isn't being perceived as sour grapes.
Guess what? We broke rules. Lots of them. Badly. And we're the good guys!! Brilliant mastery of a complicated situation by Shalala. It's great to be!!
Tim Reynolds @ByTimReynolds
Last tweet of night: I'm doing the math in my head. The "extra benefits" Shapiro provided? They added up to what, like maybe $40K? Really?
Tim Reynolds @ByTimReynolds
Last tweet of night: I'm doing the math in my head. The "extra benefits" Shapiro provided? They added up to what, like maybe $40K? Really?
That's less than Marie Elena Perez billed the NCAA for her time.
Tim Reynolds @ByTimReynolds
Last tweet of night: I'm doing the math in my head. The "extra benefits" Shapiro provided? They added up to what, like maybe $40K? Really?
That's less than Marie Elena Perez billed the NCAA for her time.
Tim Reynolds @ByTimReynolds
Last tweet of night: I'm doing the math in my head. The "extra benefits" Shapiro provided? They added up to what, like maybe $40K? Really?
That's less than Marie Elena Perez billed the NCAA for her time.
I said this the other day as well.
Tim Reynolds @ByTimReynolds
Last tweet of night: I'm doing the math in my head. The "extra benefits" Shapiro provided? They added up to what, like maybe $40K? Really?
That's less than Marie Elena Perez billed the NCAA for her time.
I said this the other day as well.
Just sent you a case of girl scout cookies
And yet i got attacked all day for saying maybe the cooperation strategy we pursued wasnt an unmitigated success. I'd guess Donna Shalala herself regrets it, yet her sycophants here see her every action as beyond flawless.They answer to the world and the rest of college football. And, the way they answer is that, if they **** us, no one will ever cooperate with an NCAA investigation again. There'd be no reason or incentive to do anything but stall, stonewall or outright lie.
But what good would an adversarial approach done right off the bat? And what harm has been done by cooperating up until this point?
I'm not sure how the outcome would have been any different if UM and Shalala had come out swinging like they have now. I'm not saying the course of cooperation is an "umitigated success", but I don't see how other course of action would have been better to this point. They were cooperative up until the point they learned about the NCAA's malfeasance. Seems like a prudent approach to a situation to me.
+1.
I respect Ethnic as a poster, but he has been on a rant all week and just way off base. Gotta look at the big picture. Obviously we had some of this info, and obviously Donna thought she could get it settled. When she realized she couldnt, the gloves came off. Timing was perfect.
One big factor being overlooked by many is the desperate attempt of Emerett to keep his job. I think that is what is ******** the settlement up. The only possible way he can save face is to win in front of the COI. Yes, the NCAA has egg on its face, but Emerett (to a lesser extent than now) doesnt.
He is the man in charge, and he is trying to throw as many people under the bus as he can to get himself out of this. But if the milk is sour, Donna aint the type **** to drink it.
That's just bull ****. I haven't been on a rant at all. I have just disputed those who insist that DS has somehow played this all like a genius. I'm not so sure she herself thinks her card playing to date has worked as anticipated. She's ****ed for a reason, after all.
And your description of what is 'obvious' is quite obviously uninformed, which is funny. There is no chance she thought this would be 'settled.' There is no precedent for the NCAA enforcement staff 'settling' charges. Just not something that happens. She's ****ed because the charges are not insignificant, and the NCAA's process for arriving at them was pathetic. Yet when you understand who screwed up the NCAA is, you might also realize why going out of your way to cooperate is not a great strategy.