forums

Article: NCAA Charges Miami With Lack of Institutional Control

View as article
Advertisement
USNAVYCANE said:
Why are no charges being pressed vs the NCAA for smuggling a cell phone into an inmate?
Click to expand...
The report was that the investigator who spoke with Shapiro used the disposable cell phone, and that the NCAA had put money in his prison account to cover his "communication expenses." Even if he was the one who had gotten the phone while in prison, they would have to know who it was that smuggled the phone in to him and charges would be brought against that person individually and not the NCAA anyway.
 
DancingBear said:
"Enforcement
Integrity. Fair play. Accountability."These are the principles of the Enforcement division copied directly from the NCAA website.How do they expect their member institutions to follow their policies when they do not follow theirs.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Copied from Nevins prospectus he gave to potential investors no doubt.
 
Advertisement
misleading, thought it was gonna be a quote from the Emmert on them not knowing about the letter. Why start a new thread....
 
MIA42178 said:
I think he's saying it's incredible that during a 27 day internal investigation on the subject of Shapiro's attorney and the NCAA, that the letter the NCAA wrote to the criminal judge on behalf of Shapiro was never discovered.

These fools are now caught hiding evidence . . . .
Click to expand...



The Investigation on the NCAA by the "independent "Law firm that works for them on other cases was a farce. It was only to put a rubber stamp of approval so the NCAA can continue its process. The letter was public record and was somehow over looked.
There is no telling what they are not disclosing like interoffice emails, memos, meeting minutes/notes, invoices, all of which could be a lot more damaging to the ncaa leaders and the case. If UM sues they will demand and the court will order full disclosure, no way the NCAA wants that.
 
AzureCane said:
USNAVYCANE said:
Why are no charges being pressed vs the NCAA for smuggling a cell phone into an inmate?
Click to expand...
The report was that the investigator who spoke with Shapiro used the disposable cell phone, and that the NCAA had put money in his prison account to cover his "communication expenses." Even if he was the one who had gotten the phone while in prison, they would have to know who it was that smuggled the phone in to him and charges would be brought against that person individually and not the NCAA anyway.
Click to expand...

dycane said:
Pam is chill as f*ck. Known her for years.
Click to expand...

Good to hear. I would think being AG she has political aspirations. If any laws have been broken this case would put her in the national spotlight, take on the NCAA win and name your office you want to hold. Go get them Pam!!
 
Advertisement
The Franchise said:
Never trust anyone to investigate himself. NEVER. It's really a very retarded concept that makes zero sense.

I think this same law firm has also represented the ncaa in litigation. Think they're going to risk losing their lucrative client by killing them with their fake investigation?
Click to expand...

This law firm has been on the cutting edge of derivitives and wall street shenannigans fron the outset. read their website, They hilite those things. They are the establishments establishment.DONOT TRUST THEM ON ANYTHING THEY SAY.Let me ask you the name of any person indicted by Holder Who mde money in 2009. They defend criminals. They write the rules that the big shots follow.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top