Woodrey needs to be moved..

[Brian Piccolo]

If you don't see why Dallas Baptist is an outlier, then you probably think Virginia wasn't any good last year.

They weren't an outlier.

They finished 3 games out of 1st place in their conference.

So conference standing. The other of the most important criteria.

So add another to the list of things you don't understand.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

In 1999 there were three national seeds outside the top 8. One of those was #17 .

Same exact breakdown in 2008.

You're clueless.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Right, because recent history means less than eight years ago or 17 years ago.

In this context it does since the only variable is the makeup of the committee.

The process is the same.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Right, because recent history means less than eight years ago or 17 years ago.

In this context it does since the only variable is the makeup of the committee.

The process is the same.

It's obvious to everyone except you that they lean on the RPI much more than they did when we went to the Super Regional format.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

It's obvious to everyone except you that they lean on the RPI much more than they did when we went to the Super Regional format.

No they don't.

They've gone straight RPI to pick national seeds twice and neither of them were in the last 5 (or 6, or 7, or 8) years.

The distribution of national seeds based on RPI is

Wait for it.....

Random.

You're being exposed as a clown.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

It's obvious to everyone except you that they lean on the RPI much more than they did when we went to the Super Regional format.

No they don't.

They've gone straight RPI to pick national seeds twice and neither of them were in the last 5 (or 6, or 7, or 8) years.

The distribution of national seeds based on RPI is

Wait for it.....

Random.

You're being exposed as a clown.

That's probably the worst example of "random" that I have ever seen, even though I already knew that you don't understand the term.

Does being in the top 8 of the RPI give you a better chance of getting a national seed? (Hint, 82.5% in last 5 years)

 

[Brian Piccolo]

That's probably the worst example of "random" that I have ever seen, even though I already knew that you don't understand the term.

From year-to-year the distribution of national seeds based on RPI is unpredictable.

I've shown a clear understanding of the term random. You have not.

That's why you dodged my earlier post regarding 'perfectly predictable'

If I was as much a dope as you I'd say you're shook.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

That's probably the worst example of "random" that I have ever seen, even though I already knew that you don't understand the term.

From year-to-year the distribution of national seeds based on RPI is unpredictable.

This guys thinks that the following numbers are "unpredictable" and "random":

National Seed RPI's by Year
2015: 1-3-4-5-7-8-11-13
2014: 1-2-3-4-5-6-8-11
2013: 1-2-3-4-5-6-8-9
2012: 1-2-3-4-5-6-8-11
2011: 1-2-3-4-5-6-11-12

Yeah, don't see any connection to the RPI at all.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Yeah, don't see any connection to the RPI at all.

I never said otherwise.

You're just a dishonest ****.

And you love to fool around with time frames.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Hey, why isn't Washington predicted to be a national seed? They are leading the Pac 12.

Conference standing......check

What's missing?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Yeah, don't see any connection to the RPI at all.

I never said otherwise.

You're just a dishonest ****.

And you love to fool around with time frames.

If RPI isn't the overwhelming factor, how would you break it down with conference standing? 50/50?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Hey, why isn't Southern Miss predicted to be a national seed? Leading their conference, 34-14 record. Seems like everything is good except.....

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Hey, why isn't Washington predicted to be a national seed? They are leading the Pac 12.

Conference standing......check

What's missing?

Yeah, so just like I said.

One is insufficient without the other.

RPI and Conference Standing.

 

[Brian Piccolo]

Yeah, so just like I said.

One is insufficient without the other.

RPI and Conference Standing.

And just to reiterate that you were wrong to say that it's 'mostly entirely' about the RPI.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Hey, why isn't Washington predicted to be a national seed? They are leading the Pac 12.

Conference standing......check

What's missing?

Yeah, so just like I said.

One is insufficient without the other.

RPI and Conference Standing.

I know it hurts, but go ahead and admit that they aren't a national seed because of their RPI.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Yeah, so just like I said.

One is insufficient without the other.

RPI and Conference Standing.

And just to reiterate that you were wrong to say that it's 'mostly entirely' about the RPI.

Don't put quotes around something that I did not write, liar. Get a grasp of the English language.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

If you don't see why Dallas Baptist is an outlier, then you probably think Virginia wasn't any good last year.

They weren't an outlier.

They finished 3 games out of 1st place in their conference.

So conference standing. The other of the most important criteria.

So add another to the list of things you don't understand.

Miami finished three games out of 1st place in their conference. The difference? Conference RPI. Yep, there's that acronym again.

You are so bad at this.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Yeah, so just like I said.

One is insufficient without the other.

RPI and Conference Standing.

And just to reiterate that you were wrong to say that it's 'mostly entirely' about the RPI.

So they have everything but the RPI, and they aren't going to be a national seed because of that, but it's not "almost entirely" about the RPI?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Hey, why isn't Tulane going to be a national seed? They are leading their conference and have a record of 33-14. What's missing?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

How is Texas A&M being mentioned as a national seed? They are in 3RD PLACE in their conference!!!