252cane
All-ACC
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 16,589
Lol I never said he had nothing to do with skinner. I said Mario being here is what closed the deal
forums
Woodiel named TE Coach, per FootballScoop
- Thread starter One9
- Start date
Advertisement
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 32,610
I’m not going back & forth w/ u on this. U changed ur tune after I posted a direct quote from Skinner. I posted various post from u saying the exact opposite. Regardless, trying to say I had an issue w/ u saying Field is gone is the finest Midwestern, USDA purist form of bull chit. So pat urself on the back for calling out Field possibly being gone, but I wasn’t one of those dudes who was “rah-rah” Coach Fields. If u were apart of the 5-7, & in Field’s case, 6-7 too, then u can kick rocks. At the same time, I’m not going see something stated that wasn’t true & not speak up on it.
252cane
All-ACC
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 16,589
More than likely he will be in the recruiting department. Probably will be the top guy there
252cane
All-ACC
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 16,589
Sir never changed anything I said lol. I flat out never said once he had nothing to do with it. You was just ready to jump out the window that day for whatever reason. My post are all there and nothing has been changed or deleted.
Like I said I don’t have a problem with field I’m glad the guy gets to keep making a living and will be in a role now that fits him better
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 32,610
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
www.canesinsight.com
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
www.canesinsight.com
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
www.canesinsight.com
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
www.canesinsight.com
Listen, let me be very clear…u’re not important enough to me for me to want to “jump out the window” for. U can say “ I flat out never said once he had nothing to do with it” & technically u would be 1000% correct. U never once echoed those words, in their direct form; yet, like most politicians who try to weasel their way out of implication, you absolutely alluded to & implied Field didn’t have a bearing on Skinner coming here, & that it was Mario.
Spare me the word play; if I was the only one who took ur post to mean something else, then I would say my fault, but u know exactly wtf u were implying. Don’t be a weasel on this board; it would be more prudent for u to say “I didn’t mean it to come off the way” vs. trying to gaslight the board.
Advertisement
Empirical Cane
We are what we repeatedly do.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Messages
- 37,552
I would jump out of a window for you Relly.Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Listen, let me be very clear…u’re not important enough to me for me to want to “jump out the window” for. U can say “ I flat out never said once he had nothing to do with it” & technically u would be 1000% correct. U never once echoed those words, in their direct form; yet, like most politicians who try to weasel their way out of implication, you absolutely alluded to & implied Field didn’t have a bearing on Skinner coming here, & that it was Mario.
Spare me the word play; if I was the only one who took ur post to mean something else, then I would say my fault, but u know exactly wtf u were implying. Don’t be a weasel on this board; it would be more prudent for u to say “I didn’t mean it to come off the way” vs. trying to gaslight the board.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 17,107
Mario doing whatever it takes to win. Change after change. Ballsy move by him. It will be interesting to see how Fields handles this.
252cane
All-ACC
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 16,589
see now you are going to the point of delusion. I don’t imply anything I say what I feel. If I wanted to say he had nothing to do with it I would’ve but I know that’s a lie. My point was you can’t just give him all the credit because Mario being here sealed it.Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Listen, let me be very clear…u’re not important enough to me for me to want to “jump out the window” for. U can say “ I flat out never said once he had nothing to do with it” & technically u would be 1000% correct. U never once echoed those words, in their direct form; yet, like most politicians who try to weasel their way out of implication, you absolutely alluded to & implied Field didn’t have a bearing on Skinner coming here, & that it was Mario.
Spare me the word play; if I was the only one who took ur post to mean something else, then I would say my fault, but u know exactly wtf u were implying. Don’t be a weasel on this board; it would be more prudent for u to say “I didn’t mean it to come off the way” vs. trying to gaslight the board.
Just let it go man you were wrong about what I said then and you still wrong now but it’s not a big deal lol. Field is a good dude and hope he does a good job in his new role
da truth
1st team All-American
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- Messages
- 4,911
It’s a win if field is ok with it. Field has done a great job with the te room while here
Advertisement
Cribby and Inday said in the previous pages, that he is okay with the move. So, as of now, we should be good!
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
- Messages
- 12,388
Can you feel the tension in the air right now?Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Strong gone
Which is kinda crazy because our LB class actually turned out pretty good! Just because he is the LB coach doesn’t mean he was the one responsible for landing those guys
Listen, let me be very clear…u’re not important enough to me for me to want to “jump out the window” for. U can say “ I flat out never said once he had nothing to do with it” & technically u would be 1000% correct. U never once echoed those words, in their direct form; yet, like most politicians who try to weasel their way out of implication, you absolutely alluded to & implied Field didn’t have a bearing on Skinner coming here, & that it was Mario.
Spare me the word play; if I was the only one who took ur post to mean something else, then I would say my fault, but u know exactly wtf u were implying. Don’t be a weasel on this board; it would be more prudent for u to say “I didn’t mean it to come off the way” vs. trying to gaslight the board.
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 32,610
Nah, no tension.
Advertisement
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
- Messages
- 12,388
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2017
- Messages
- 8,620
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 6,755
My guess is Field is gone this off-season somewhere on field. Guy can recruit.
Advertisement
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 45,858
You mean leaving here for another program?
Seems to me (just a guess) he’s gonna stick with Mario and be his main recruit guy. That’s a priority for Mario and probably could pay pretty well
Me throwing **** agains the wall though
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 41,493
He resembles Bert Kreischer
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 14, 2016
- Messages
- 35,469
It’ll be the same role he had with Mario at Oregon, Recruiting Director
Kudos to Mario for his willingness to make moves. That said, in the end it all falls on him, so hopefully knows what he's doing.
Advertisement