Wait...
It's being said in other threads that talent is our issue, not coaching. So why the displeasure for Franklin?
Well he is not doing either bringing in talent or coaching.
Well he's not the one recruiting all of our D-linemen. The coaches recruit by region, not by position.
Also...
We normally 2-gap on the defensive line, unless of course it's a 3rd & long situation. That's 2 downs out of 3 that we're not playing with our ears pinned back so you can basically forget about getting any pass rush on 1st or 2nd down. On 3rd down our "pass rush specialists" come in at DE and we pin our ears back. That's the ONLY time we really go after the QB and we're basically relying on AQM or McCord to get there. (unless we blitz LB's, which we only do on 3rd & medium I believe) This style of defense is never gonna register high sack numbers. If you look at D'Onofrio's past you'll probably notice that he's never had a high sack defense. This isn't like the old Miami style of defense where your DL played with their ears pinned back all game and we got tons of TFL's and sacks.
1. Last year, FSU had a beast DL (Werner and Carradine as their starting DEs) and managed 2.57 sacks per game
http://www.cfbstats.com/2012/team/234/sack/index.html
2. This year, with top recruits Edwards Jr., Goldman, and ******* Jernigan (coordinated by Pruitt, i.e. DEFENSIVE SUPERGENIUS) FSU has produced 2.38 sacks per game
http://www.cfbstats.com/2013/team/234/sack/index.html
3. This year, with McCord, Chickillo, Renfrow, and Pierre, Miami is producing 2.88 sacks per game (and the remaining games offer no reason to expect a decrease)
http://www.cfbstats.com/2013/team/415/sack/index.html
Much respect to your football pedigree and schematic analysis, Wildcat, but sometimes the "eye test" can be misleading when you have a strong emotional reaction -- frustration -- to what you're watching. Ballers are gonna ball and JAGs are gonna **** up; it just so happens this year that we have a lot more JAGs (much love, despite the criticism) in starting positions and therefore have more mistakes.