There are only three things fans can do...

Missed the last 3 home games of my season ticket. First was my Pops being in the hospital out of town and almost died, then the last 2 have been due to a medical condition of my own. Been lucky enough to sit near D$ and chat with him from time to time. There is no more of a loyal die hard fan and patient person than D$. I am pretty honored to think of him as a friend.

I agree with his points. Support the team if you can, cause your a fan. Be vocal and opinionated. Last is be wise, as the things we say and do have consequences. Be smart and merry, enjoy the good times. Sulk in the bad times. Be fortunate for what we had and even more fortunate in what we have. Look toward the future with hope, and be gracious for what is given, because nothing lasts forever and nothing is guaranteed except death and taxes.

I wish I could have been physically able to goto the last couple of games. I am unsure if my physical conditions will allow me to goto the games next year, but I am going to buy season tickets because it supports the team I love. I'll goto all the games I can, and give the tickets to the games I can't to someone that deserves them.

Just my 2 cents.
 
Advertisement
great posting

but i'm pretty sure the three things we need to do are

HIT STICK

BUST ****

TALK ****
 
Go ahead and keep believing the fans have nothing to do with corching changes. I'd direct you to Donna Shalala's comments after she fired Shannvo. She clearly stated that a big part of the reason she got rid of him was the fans' discontent. Happens everywhere.

Don't be so naive to think that teams and universities would choose to eat big contracts if the fans didn't start withholding their money. It's a money-driven game. If you think a career .500 corch like Al Tin, who hasn't stopped anyone here in 3 years, has complete autonomy with this football program, then I got some great swamp land to sell you.


I never said fans don't have a say. I said "isn't happening at this stage", which it won't. Al has earned the right to make those decisions autonomously, at this point in time.

Al hasn't earned **** at this point. He's barely earned the right to keep his own job. He's barely a .500 corch.

Doesn't matter what you or I feel he's earned. The admin. (by all accounts) is behind Al 100% (at this point in time), due to the fact he's stuck by and added credibility and continuity to the program.

His name was being thrown around for NFL jobs a month ago and now he's "barely earned the right to keep his own job". This **** is getting laughable.

You're making way too many assumptions with zero basis in fact:
1. You're assuming that the administration is willing to stand by and let Corch Al keep Duh and this historically bad defense around and watch attendance and support for the program dwindle to sickening lows;
2. That Corch Al's name was actually in play for any NFL jobs. Who mentioned him for an NFL job? Internet posters?

Because the post is full of assumptions couched as fact it's devoid of any merit.

Merit this:

Chasin' the Devil: Sumlin, Golden among names generating NFL buzz
 
Al cut another 5 years to another decade off the reconstruction of this program by simply staying and recruiting his *** off.. He's earned at a minimum 6 years at this gig.

Lol at the state of this clusterfark if he blew town when Yahoo unloaded. My god, a 10 ton wrecking ball wouldnt have laid more destruction.

That's what I feel. I think he has what it takes and will make the necessary changes. He's in year three. The heat should be turning up in year 5 if he still doesn't have us turned around and competing for championships. I understand the impatience, due to the incompetence that has bled through this program for a decade but sheesh.

So you don't understand frustration with a guy fielding a historically bad defense 3 years into the gig? You don't typically go from being historically bad like this to magically competing for NCs. This doesn't seem like a problem to you that we're still getting gutted and emasculated in year 3 by a murderer's row like UNC, Weak, VT, Puke and Uvag?

I understand the frustration.....trust me, I'm frustrated for the EXACT same reasons you are. I'm just trying to look at from a somewhat more optimistic viewpoint. I just think based on the negative cloud surrounding this program combined with the history of Al fielding solid (not great) defenses, doesn't justify the reaction.
 
Advertisement
Al cut another 5 years to another decade off the reconstruction of this program by simply staying and recruiting his *** off.. He's earned at a minimum 6 years at this gig.

Lol at the state of this clusterfark if he blew town when Yahoo unloaded. My god, a 10 ton wrecking ball wouldnt have laid more destruction.

That's what I feel. I think he has what it takes and will make the necessary changes. He's in year three. The heat should be turning up in year 5 if he still doesn't have us turned around and competing for championships. I understand the impatience, due to the incompetence that has bled through this program for a decade but sheesh.

So you don't understand frustration with a guy fielding a historically bad defense 3 years into the gig? You don't typically go from being historically bad like this to magically competing for NCs. This doesn't seem like a problem to you that we're still getting gutted and emasculated in year 3 by a murderer's row like UNC, Weak, VT, Puke and Uvag?

I understand the frustration.....trust me, I'm frustrated for the EXACT same reasons you are. I'm just trying to look at from a somewhat more optimistic viewpoint. I just think based on the negative cloud surrounding this program combined with the history of Al fielding solid (not great) defenses, doesn't justify the reaction.

Some of the overreaction is due to unreasonableness and lack of recognition that the program was in a really bad place with a really bad team. The coaches stuck by the team and the school and I choose to stick by them at this time. 2 bad coaches, plus bad recruiting, plus NCAA investigation = rebuilding.

Problem is we went 7-0 and some people bought in that we were back even though Golden himself warned everyone. Told everyone the games would be tough and we are not there yet. Fans thought it was coach speak.

It was like the fans saw a big brownie and wanted to dive in and eat it. Golden kept saying it is not a brownie. Fans kept wanting it. Golden kept saying it is not a brownie. Fans kept wanting it. Now the fans have **** all over their face from eating what turned out to not be a brownie but a glossy covered **** and are now mad at Golden. Golden's response - i told you it was not a brownie. I am trying to make brownies, but the recipe and the ingredients are not there yet. Fans response - I want a brownie. You promised me a brownie. We need a new baker.

The team is infuriating to watch, but the constant *****ing and jerking each other off for who ******* the most or has the best new flavor of dorito joke is making this board a ****hole and steaming over to the recruiting board.
 
Al cut another 5 years to another decade off the reconstruction of this program by simply staying and recruiting his *** off.. He's earned at a minimum 6 years at this gig.

Lol at the state of this clusterfark if he blew town when Yahoo unloaded. My god, a 10 ton wrecking ball wouldnt have laid more destruction.

Top notch, intelligent recruiting is the foundation great programs are built on. Three more years of the great recruiting AG has done so far is what will lead us to the promised land. If he couldn't win us a NC then whoever come after him will finish the job.
 
Just my opinion, but this is what's REALLY holding the program back. Coaches come and go, but we simply cannot stay in that shytehole and expect to ever maintain an elite program. Again, just my opinion, and I realize that it's a pipe dream that we get our own stadium any time soon.

I completely agree with you. There was a thread here recently asking if we would be satisfied with a 5 year plan. I suspect it will be a revolving door 5 year plan, with continuous false hope. It reminds me of when I was a USC student and covering the basketball team for the student newspaper. We had a nice NCAA tournament team one year. I wrote we were probably 4 years away from legitimate chance at the Final Four. Then I caught myself and zapped that sentence. Who am I trying to kid? This is USC basketball. There's no birthright or logic toward the Final Four, four years or four decades from now.

I don't think the Dolphins or Canes will win a championship in that stadium. That was my position on the Dolphins once I first set foot in the place in 1987, and no reason to alter for the Canes. I believe in bottom line early foundational logic, not ping ponging due to the latest news. Playing that far away and in such a dismal stadium is a natural leak. You forfeit 1.5 to 2 points per game and lose out in recruiting also. No matter how well we fare, nobody is convincing me that some top players don't look at that situation and atmosphere and either never consider us or eventually reject us.

Besides, I don't think Miami is on the level of Notre Dame or Alabama or USC or other long term dynasties, programs that can lay dormant but always eligible if not inevitable for a huge rebound. Maybe that's because I started following the program and attending the games in the late '60s as a kid. There was no prospect of titles or major bowls at that point so IMO it's silly to announce that since we're in a fertile recruiting area that the title opportunities and wins will inevitably follow. That's a fraction of the equation. You need special, special people at the helm, whether it's coaches or skill positions or defensive tackle. Actually, all of the above. In this stadium as a college venue I don't see how you attract special people. The fact that we chose to play in this place and seem willing to accept it for another two decades screams to me that we are basically overmatched. I'll have faith in the upside when someone shows up who makes a new venue the absolute top priority. That was Schnellenberger more than three decades ago.
 
Just my opinion, but this is what's REALLY holding the program back. Coaches come and go, but we simply cannot stay in that shytehole and expect to ever maintain an elite program. Again, just my opinion, and I realize that it's a pipe dream that we get our own stadium any time soon.

I completely agree with you. There was a thread here recently asking if we would be satisfied with a 5 year plan. I suspect it will be a revolving door 5 year plan, with continuous false hope. It reminds me of when I was a USC student and covering the basketball team for the student newspaper. We had a nice NCAA tournament team one year. I wrote we were probably 4 years away from legitimate chance at the Final Four. Then I caught myself and zapped that sentence. Who am I trying to kid? This is USC basketball. There's no birthright or logic toward the Final Four, four years or four decades from now.

I don't think the Dolphins or Canes will win a championship in that stadium. That was my position on the Dolphins once I first set foot in the place in 1987, and no reason to alter for the Canes. I believe in bottom line early foundational logic, not ping ponging due to the latest news. Playing that far away and in such a dismal stadium is a natural leak. You forfeit 1.5 to 2 points per game and lose out in recruiting also. No matter how well we fare, nobody is convincing me that some top players don't look at that situation and atmosphere and either never consider us or eventually reject us.

Besides, I don't think Miami is on the level of Notre Dame or Alabama or USC or other long term dynasties, programs that can lay dormant but always eligible if not inevitable for a huge rebound. Maybe that's because I started following the program and attending the games in the late '60s as a kid. There was no prospect of titles or major bowls at that point so IMO it's silly to announce that since we're in a fertile recruiting area that the title opportunities and wins will inevitably follow. That's a fraction of the equation. You need special, special people at the helm, whether it's coaches or skill positions or defensive tackle. Actually, all of the above. In this stadium as a college venue I don't see how you attract special people. The fact that we chose to play in this place and seem willing to accept it for another two decades screams to me that we are basically overmatched. I'll have faith in the upside when someone shows up who makes a new venue the absolute top priority. That was Schnellenberger more than three decades ago.

So let me get this straight... In your opinion, Miami will be a revolving door of coaches giving false hope but never winning anything? And Miami can't or won't attract top coaches/staff and loses top recruits all because of Sun Life stadium? Wow.

As much as I loved the Orange Bowl stadium, what made that place special were the teams the Miami put out onto its field, not the other way around. The Orange Bowl was so difficult/intimidating for opposing teams because Miami was fielding some of the greatest college football teams of all time. The Orange Bowl wasn't such a scary place for opposing teams in the 50s, 60s or 70s, I wonder why? You mean to tell me that those Miami teams of the '80s, 90s and early 2000's would not have been as successful if they had played at Sun Life stadium??? Jerome Brown, Sean Taylor, Michael Irvin, etc... would somehow have not been capable of winning national titles if they had played in Sun Life stadium??? I find that hard to believe.

You claim that Miami loses top recruits because of Sun Life stadium but yet you cannot prove this claim. In fact, the evidence clearly points that it has no bearing on a decision by a recruit. Look at this year as one example; Miami has a top 5 type recruiting class. I've never once read of a recruit saying "I didn't come to Miami because of their stadium situation." What really matters to most to recruits is proximity to home, relationship with coaches and playing time, in no specific order.

I am really shocked that you have so little faith in the Miami program rebounding from being in a down cycle. Your point about the 1960's is not applicable anymore. The issue in the 60's was that the talent was in South Forida but Miami football wasn't recruiting it in the 60s. It took Schnellenberger to realize that focusing on the State of Miami talent was the way to winning. The formula is out there now. The talent is here in South Florida and isn't going away. All it takes for Miami to be elite is to have a coach that can (a) follow the blueprint started in the early 80s and recruit the local talent and (b) coach up said talent. Miami will always be a good head coach away from national titles by virtue of being located in a hotbed of talent.

You believe great coaches and staff won't come to Miami because of Sun Life stadium??? The determining factor in Miami getting coaches is money, plain and simple. If Miami opens up its pocket books, they could snag just about any coach. Problem has been Miami has been cheap when it comes to salary but now it looks like that is changing. No coach in their right mind would turn down $2 million dollars to coach at Miami because of Sun Life stadium (a facility that is used by the team only 6 or so times every year, mind you).

Don't get me wrong, I would love for Miami to have its own stadium. It would be great for us as fans. But it would have no bearing on the on field product. Miami still would have been terrible because of Coker and Shannon and no stadium in the world could've changed that fact. Miami has been losing over the past decade because of poor coaching and all that comes with it. That's it. And as soon as Miami has good coaching (jury still out on Golden IMO), Miami will be elite again.

A question: if the stadium is such an integral part to success of a college football program, why don't teams like Auburn, Tennessee, Penn State, etc... with great stadiums have championship caliber teams each year? A current day prime example is Alabama: why were they so bad for 15 years since they have a top notch on campus stadium? Because they hired the likes of Mike Dubose, Mike Shula, etc... Then they hire Nick Saban and see what happens. It's all about hiring good coaches that can recruit and coach them up.

Finally, I'd like to say that Miami is a special, special program. No other program has the mystique/aura/undefineable quality that Miami has. It was always there, it just took Schnellenberger to bring it out, and once it was discovered in the 80s, it will always be there. It might get hidden when you have guys like Coker and Shannon at the helm but it is still there under the surface, just waiting for the right coach to tap into it. Sure, other programs have history and mystique as well but they are nothing like The U. This isn't me just being a homer; if you ask any objective, non-biased college football observer, they see the same things. Miami is a unique program.
 
Advertisement
Understood but I disagree with #2. If you have a recruit, acting like a ****** (Lane), he deserves to be labeled as one. I can understand if people disagree with that, but that's how I feel.

Wait until after signing day.

If a guy like Sony Michel starts having second thoughts, you don't want him to have a negative impression of Miami because of our fans. He is a guy that can make a difference in wins and losses.

Bridgewater cited Miami's "abusive" fanbase as one of the reasons he chose Louisville. The fans said "that shows he isn't mentally tough." He is now considered one of the most mentally tough players in the country, as well as one of the best.

This isn't about what's right or wrong. It's about doing our small part to help this program acquire talent and win games.

I can't accept that a kid would choose to not go to a program because of its fan base. Every fan base has its group of morons that say ridiculous things to or about a kid. That's immature. And weird. I think that these are after-the-fact excuses used to cover up or justify deciding to go elsewhere.
 
kmwcane --- not going to quote your post, because it's really long. I think you make some legit points. I disagree with some of them, but you've laid out an argument without resorting to attacks. It's refreshing.

No one can prove that Miami has or will lose recruits because of SunLife, unless the kid specifically says so. That's pretty unlikely, and I don't think it's the stadium itself as much as it is the location of the stadium and the gameday atmosphere. For all of its faults, the OB had a mystique about it, and the great players from the 80s definitely built on that. Much like the question about whether the stadium and atmosphere costs us recruits, it's impossible to know whether all of those players would have come to Miami if it weren't for the OB and the mystique. Would Howard have been able to build the program without it? I don't know the answer to that. What I do know is that a lot of kids rave about the gameday atmospheres when they go on OVs to other schools. I don't think we ever really see that here. They talk about guys that have gone on to the League, they like the coaching staff, great academics, etc. But not about what a great gameday atmosphere we have. In my opinion, the stadium and gameday atmosphere has a trickle down effect on the program as a whole, which of course includes the product on the field.

The bottom line is that, until some player or coach comes out and says that the stadium is the reason for some decision that they've made, we're all just speculating...myself included. Whether or not the stadium is part of the problem, I think we can all agree that a near-campus stadium (on campus is the pipiest of pipe dreams), with a more appropriate size and better design, would be a benefit to the program.
 
Just my opinion, but this is what's REALLY holding the program back. Coaches come and go, but we simply cannot stay in that shytehole and expect to ever maintain an elite program. Again, just my opinion, and I realize that it's a pipe dream that we get our own stadium any time soon.

I completely agree with you. There was a thread here recently asking if we would be satisfied with a 5 year plan. I suspect it will be a revolving door 5 year plan, with continuous false hope. It reminds me of when I was a USC student and covering the basketball team for the student newspaper. We had a nice NCAA tournament team one year. I wrote we were probably 4 years away from legitimate chance at the Final Four. Then I caught myself and zapped that sentence. Who am I trying to kid? This is USC basketball. There's no birthright or logic toward the Final Four, four years or four decades from now.

I don't think the Dolphins or Canes will win a championship in that stadium. That was my position on the Dolphins once I first set foot in the place in 1987, and no reason to alter for the Canes. I believe in bottom line early foundational logic, not ping ponging due to the latest news. Playing that far away and in such a dismal stadium is a natural leak. You forfeit 1.5 to 2 points per game and lose out in recruiting also. No matter how well we fare, nobody is convincing me that some top players don't look at that situation and atmosphere and either never consider us or eventually reject us.

Besides, I don't think Miami is on the level of Notre Dame or Alabama or USC or other long term dynasties, programs that can lay dormant but always eligible if not inevitable for a huge rebound. Maybe that's because I started following the program and attending the games in the late '60s as a kid. There was no prospect of titles or major bowls at that point so IMO it's silly to announce that since we're in a fertile recruiting area that the title opportunities and wins will inevitably follow. That's a fraction of the equation. You need special, special people at the helm, whether it's coaches or skill positions or defensive tackle. Actually, all of the above. In this stadium as a college venue I don't see how you attract special people. The fact that we chose to play in this place and seem willing to accept it for another two decades screams to me that we are basically overmatched. I'll have faith in the upside when someone shows up who makes a new venue the absolute top priority. That was Schnellenberger more than three decades ago.

Losing the OB was an unmitigated disaster. The relative lack of protest from fans or the community at the time was a gigantic warning that community support for the program had seriously waned. I'm not sure if we can afford to have a stadium larger than 45 to 48k anymore. I agree, that the stadium is a huge issue. Being the butt of national jokes is not a good sign.
 
Advertisement
Just my opinion, but this is what's REALLY holding the program back. Coaches come and go, but we simply cannot stay in that shytehole and expect to ever maintain an elite program. Again, just my opinion, and I realize that it's a pipe dream that we get our own stadium any time soon.

I completely agree with you. There was a thread here recently asking if we would be satisfied with a 5 year plan. I suspect it will be a revolving door 5 year plan, with continuous false hope. It reminds me of when I was a USC student and covering the basketball team for the student newspaper. We had a nice NCAA tournament team one year. I wrote we were probably 4 years away from legitimate chance at the Final Four. Then I caught myself and zapped that sentence. Who am I trying to kid? This is USC basketball. There's no birthright or logic toward the Final Four, four years or four decades from now.

I don't think the Dolphins or Canes will win a championship in that stadium. That was my position on the Dolphins once I first set foot in the place in 1987, and no reason to alter for the Canes. I believe in bottom line early foundational logic, not ping ponging due to the latest news. Playing that far away and in such a dismal stadium is a natural leak. You forfeit 1.5 to 2 points per game and lose out in recruiting also. No matter how well we fare, nobody is convincing me that some top players don't look at that situation and atmosphere and either never consider us or eventually reject us.

Besides, I don't think Miami is on the level of Notre Dame or Alabama or USC or other long term dynasties, programs that can lay dormant but always eligible if not inevitable for a huge rebound. Maybe that's because I started following the program and attending the games in the late '60s as a kid. There was no prospect of titles or major bowls at that point so IMO it's silly to announce that since we're in a fertile recruiting area that the title opportunities and wins will inevitably follow. That's a fraction of the equation. You need special, special people at the helm, whether it's coaches or skill positions or defensive tackle. Actually, all of the above. In this stadium as a college venue I don't see how you attract special people. The fact that we chose to play in this place and seem willing to accept it for another two decades screams to me that we are basically overmatched. I'll have faith in the upside when someone shows up who makes a new venue the absolute top priority. That was Schnellenberger more than three decades ago.

So let me get this straight... In your opinion, Miami will be a revolving door of coaches giving false hope but never winning anything? And Miami can't or won't attract top coaches/staff and loses top recruits all because of Sun Life stadium? Wow.

As much as I loved the Orange Bowl stadium, what made that place special were the teams the Miami put out onto its field, not the other way around. The Orange Bowl was so difficult/intimidating for opposing teams because Miami was fielding some of the greatest college football teams of all time. The Orange Bowl wasn't such a scary place for opposing teams in the 50s, 60s or 70s, I wonder why? You mean to tell me that those Miami teams of the '80s, 90s and early 2000's would not have been as successful if they had played at Sun Life stadium??? Jerome Brown, Sean Taylor, Michael Irvin, etc... would somehow have not been capable of winning national titles if they had played in Sun Life stadium??? I find that hard to believe.

You claim that Miami loses top recruits because of Sun Life stadium but yet you cannot prove this claim. In fact, the evidence clearly points that it has no bearing on a decision by a recruit. Look at this year as one example; Miami has a top 5 type recruiting class. I've never once read of a recruit saying "I didn't come to Miami because of their stadium situation." What really matters to most to recruits is proximity to home, relationship with coaches and playing time, in no specific order.

I am really shocked that you have so little faith in the Miami program rebounding from being in a down cycle. Your point about the 1960's is not applicable anymore. The issue in the 60's was that the talent was in South Forida but Miami football wasn't recruiting it in the 60s. It took Schnellenberger to realize that focusing on the State of Miami talent was the way to winning. The formula is out there now. The talent is here in South Florida and isn't going away. All it takes for Miami to be elite is to have a coach that can (a) follow the blueprint started in the early 80s and recruit the local talent and (b) coach up said talent. Miami will always be a good head coach away from national titles by virtue of being located in a hotbed of talent.

You believe great coaches and staff won't come to Miami because of Sun Life stadium??? The determining factor in Miami getting coaches is money, plain and simple. If Miami opens up its pocket books, they could snag just about any coach. Problem has been Miami has been cheap when it comes to salary but now it looks like that is changing. No coach in their right mind would turn down $2 million dollars to coach at Miami because of Sun Life stadium (a facility that is used by the team only 6 or so times every year, mind you).

Don't get me wrong, I would love for Miami to have its own stadium. It would be great for us as fans. But it would have no bearing on the on field product. Miami still would have been terrible because of Coker and Shannon and no stadium in the world could've changed that fact. Miami has been losing over the past decade because of poor coaching and all that comes with it. That's it. And as soon as Miami has good coaching (jury still out on Golden IMO), Miami will be elite again.

A question: if the stadium is such an integral part to success of a college football program, why don't teams like Auburn, Tennessee, Penn State, etc... with great stadiums have championship caliber teams each year? A current day prime example is Alabama: why were they so bad for 15 years since they have a top notch on campus stadium? Because they hired the likes of Mike Dubose, Mike Shula, etc... Then they hire Nick Saban and see what happens. It's all about hiring good coaches that can recruit and coach them up.

Finally, I'd like to say that Miami is a special, special program. No other program has the mystique/aura/undefineable quality that Miami has. It was always there, it just took Schnellenberger to bring it out, and once it was discovered in the 80s, it will always be there. It might get hidden when you have guys like Coker and Shannon at the helm but it is still there under the surface, just waiting for the right coach to tap into it. Sure, other programs have history and mystique as well but they are nothing like The U. This isn't me just being a homer; if you ask any objective, non-biased college football observer, they see the same things. Miami is a unique program.

Miami is not so special that it will always have a football program. Remember, that any extended period of mediocrity at Miami is a threat to it's existence. It happened once, it can happen again. If you don't think so, you haven't been a fan long enough.
 
I had one of the most stressful weekends of my life just to catch this game. Drove 23 total hours and spent way too much money. **** it, I love the canes no matter what.
 
Miami is not so special that it will always have a football program. Remember, that any extended period of mediocrity at Miami is a threat to it's existence. It happened once, it can happen again. If you don't think so, you haven't been a fan long enough.

The threat to Miami's football program was from a time when Miami had never won anything of significance before. Fast forward to present day and 5 national championships later and it is a totally different ballgame than when people wanted to shut down football in the 70s.

Though it is impossible to predict the future, I feel 99.999999% confident that the Miami football program will never be shut down. Too much history/tradition and name recognition for the university as a whole and, most importantly, too much money involved amongst many interested entities to have the football program shut down.
 
Advertisement
kmwcane --- not going to quote your post, because it's really long. I think you make some legit points. I disagree with some of them, but you've laid out an argument without resorting to attacks. It's refreshing.

No one can prove that Miami has or will lose recruits because of SunLife, unless the kid specifically says so. That's pretty unlikely, and I don't think it's the stadium itself as much as it is the location of the stadium and the gameday atmosphere. For all of its faults, the OB had a mystique about it, and the great players from the 80s definitely built on that. Much like the question about whether the stadium and atmosphere costs us recruits, it's impossible to know whether all of those players would have come to Miami if it weren't for the OB and the mystique. Would Howard have been able to build the program without it? I don't know the answer to that. What I do know is that a lot of kids rave about the gameday atmospheres when they go on OVs to other schools. I don't think we ever really see that here. They talk about guys that have gone on to the League, they like the coaching staff, great academics, etc. But not about what a great gameday atmosphere we have. In my opinion, the stadium and gameday atmosphere has a trickle down effect on the program as a whole, which of course includes the product on the field.

The bottom line is that, until some player or coach comes out and says that the stadium is the reason for some decision that they've made, we're all just speculating...myself included. Whether or not the stadium is part of the problem, I think we can all agree that a near-campus stadium (on campus is the pipiest of pipe dreams), with a more appropriate size and better design, would be a benefit to the program.

I agree, it is very nice to have discussions/disagreements about issues without name calling. I think people take someone disagreeing with them as an attack on their intelligence. I look at it as way to learn another viewpoint that might be better than my own.

I agree, a near campus stadium would be a benefit to the program, I just think the benefit would be on the fan relations/experience front and not on the actual play of the football team. Give Miami a great coach (Golden TBD) and you will see Miami start winning at an elite level again, even in Sun Life stadium.
 
kmwcane --- not going to quote your post, because it's really long. I think you make some legit points. I disagree with some of them, but you've laid out an argument without resorting to attacks. It's refreshing.

No one can prove that Miami has or will lose recruits because of SunLife, unless the kid specifically says so. That's pretty unlikely, and I don't think it's the stadium itself as much as it is the location of the stadium and the gameday atmosphere. For all of its faults, the OB had a mystique about it, and the great players from the 80s definitely built on that. Much like the question about whether the stadium and atmosphere costs us recruits, it's impossible to know whether all of those players would have come to Miami if it weren't for the OB and the mystique. Would Howard have been able to build the program without it? I don't know the answer to that. What I do know is that a lot of kids rave about the gameday atmospheres when they go on OVs to other schools. I don't think we ever really see that here. They talk about guys that have gone on to the League, they like the coaching staff, great academics, etc. But not about what a great gameday atmosphere we have. In my opinion, the stadium and gameday atmosphere has a trickle down effect on the program as a whole, which of course includes the product on the field.

The bottom line is that, until some player or coach comes out and says that the stadium is the reason for some decision that they've made, we're all just speculating...myself included. Whether or not the stadium is part of the problem, I think we can all agree that a near-campus stadium (on campus is the pipiest of pipe dreams), with a more appropriate size and better design, would be a benefit to the program.

I agree, it is very nice to have discussions/disagreements about issues without name calling. I think people take someone disagreeing with them as an attack on their intelligence. I look at it as way to learn another viewpoint that might be better than my own.

I agree, a near campus stadium would be a benefit to the program, I just think the benefit would be on the fan relations/experience front and not on the actual play of the football team. Give Miami a great coach (Golden TBD) and you will see Miami start winning at an elite level again, even in Sun Life stadium.

Don't you think, though, that the fan experience rubs off on the team on the field? If the place is packed, the opposing offense is having trouble hearing themselves, there's energy...don't you think the team would feed off of that energy? Likewise, I would think that playing in a 2/3 empty stadium, with the fans so far away from the field, would produce a lack of energy for the team to feed off of. There's just no electricity in the place. They go through the motions. I was at the BC game last year, and even though the place wasn't completely full, it was electric. You could see the BC players firing up the crowd, and they responded. It was loud. The fans were going crazy for almost the entire game. We just don't have anything like that.

Anyway, I respect your point of view and know that more fans will come if the team was playing better. These years where we have a 'marginal' team is when they need the fans the most to help influence the outcome of the games.

Another point: I've only been to one Dolphins game there, and the place was pretty full, but the atmosphere still sucked. It seemed like any time the fans got excited about something, all of the energy just went up and didn't make it to the field. Maybe it was just me.
 
The stadium is just an excuse. We don't have to convince 85 guys to play here every year. Just 25 or so. Plenty of things to sell them on.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top