- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 3,522
60% chance he qualifies.
60% chance his additude doesn't hurt the team, causing a dismissal or other problems.
80% chance he pans out on the field/playbook etc.
Fyi I am completely making those percentages up by reading the Internet tea leaves just to give this example.
That would mean there is about a 28% chance this kid truly pans out, even with his abilities, and only a 36% chance that his kid gets in and doesn't **** up.
Can we afford those percentages right now?
Maybe. But put a 95 into the first two categories for a different kid and tell me who gets the ship?
Just illustrating some rationality into the disussion. I can see both sides of the equation but many coaches think real problematic kids can sink a program.
I'm no statistics major, but I want to know how all that adds up.
This is just a chance you take...hopefully he becomes a big time play maker...and if not well...I personally would rather take the risk of him becoming a JAG here than see him go on to be like a first round receiver out of fsu and look back and say....goddamnit why didn't we recruit this guy...i dont know about the rest of you guys but that's the worse for me
What about the risk that he doesn't get in, or flunks out, or gets arrested, doesn't get in his playbook... Basically never contributes... And the kid you PASS on to give Coley a slot balls out somewhere else for 4 years?