I always LOL'd at the "we look small" garbage.
The HC I coached for had a buddy who was a GA on the USF team that beat us in Shannon's last game. The GA said that Miami looked like a **** NFL team, they weren't sure how the **** they'd match-up with Miami's athletes, and if anybody can ever "get those kids to play" that they'd be unstoppable.
We only "looked small" to people with an agenda. And the few kids we had that were undersized WERE RECRUITED LIKE THAT.
We had guys go to the NFL combine and measure better than most kids from LSU and Bama, who are both considered to have top-notch S&C programs.
Were we gonna have one of the strongest teams top to bottom? No. Miami never has. We always sacrificed brute strength for speed and explosion. What we saw during the Shannon era was a lack of talent and more importantly a lack of effort and coaching.
What we're doing now is putting more of an emphasis on strength and we're bulking our guys up. Our kids are probably gonna do great at the combine in bench tests. Who wants to bet me that we're much slower though?
I agree with most of your post, but can we please put the myth to bed that bigger must = slower? My brother went to play college football, put on 40 pounds and shaved .3 off his 40 time.
You know.....it is possible to get bigger-->stronger-->more explosive-->faster.