oopsLOL - you’re making you’re point to a card carrying committed liberal
This is funny
@calinative umstudent at this point we are beating a dead horse I feel like I'm arguing with a liberal when you present them facts they'll just screech .. So far the 9th time can you just post your case study for someone who obviously hasn't pained through all the games of last season and just goes "welp we are 10-3 we must be doing something right then"
My views have nothing to do with any political identity though. They are purely mine. I don't agree with **** just because Conservatives/Liberals typically support something. I make my own decisions.
oops
you agnostic ****. lol, jkYea, I don’t care about the politics. I totally stay away from them here.
But I just thought his point was funny. He was denigrating the limited understanding capacity of a liberal to a liberal. I have nothing against liberals, or conservatives, or libertarians or anybody else. On this board, I’m neutral.
Yea got it noted now my bad ill keep them seperatedIt’s ok. You get a feel for it. I just stay away from it. Makes things go smoother. You know there’s plenty enough to get ****ed off about here without the politics.
Am I right?
I think ur overstating the case there. I never saw one single team leave a spy on him. They stack the box & run blitz most downs. No one ive seen accounts for his ability to run in any special circumstance. Thats not taking away from malik that its probably the strongest part to his game but it really just shows how lil opponents respect the pass with him (& for good reason)I also hear no talk of how his running ability helps the backs by holding DEs/LBers. That is probably his #1 asset.
I hope Jarren/Perry/anyone clearly TAKE the job, just don't see it
Exactly.you agnostic ****. lol, jk
Dont forget hawaiiI don’t give a **** about his stats , dude won close games for them all season. And didn’t make bone headed decisions.
You’re comparing two different offenses and eras , KK didn’t have 8-10 layups a game back then. Keep *********ing to stats from different eras.
By your stupid logic Rosier is our best qb ever lol, I mean his stats are better.
Same logic all the greatest qbs in history are the last 5-6 years and played at Texas Tech , Wash St, Baylor and Okie State.
BINGO, at least one person in here actually watched. He also picked up a ton of 3rd and mediums with his legs. He is not very accurate, but the hate here is baffling to me.Virginia placed a spy on him in the redzone. He threw a jump ball for a TD to Richards on one occasion. A second time the spy got blocked on Malik's run TD to seal the game. Wisconsin ran blitzes to stop the QB draw.
The problem with this is hes not any better of a runner than we could assume Perry, Jarren, or Weldon are. So yet again, I ask what the **** is the upside?BINGO, at least one person in here actually watched. He also picked up a ton of 3rd and mediums with his legs. He is not very accurate, but the hate here is baffling to me.
Think I recall Tremaine Edmunds running a little QB spy. And I wouldn't be surprised if ND did too. But ultimately its not because he's some great runner, or even good runner. He's a solid runner. We just have so many offensive weapons that it it stretches the defense out giving him easy yards. And I think thats why VTech and ND then UVA put spys on him. Because they understood he's not really much of a threat in the passing game, might as well cut off his running ability.I think ur overstating the case there. I never saw one single team leave a spy on him. They stack the box & run blitz most downs. No one ive seen accounts for his ability to run in any special circumstance. Thats not taking away from malik that its probably the strongest part to his game but it really just shows how lil opponents respect the pass with him (& for good reason)
They have never taken a college snap, no way to know. AGAIN, he is average at best, but average qbs have won NCs.The problem with this is hes not any better of a runner than we could assume Perry, Jarren, or Weldon are. So yet again, I ask what the **** is the upside?
They have never taken a college snap, no way to know. AGAIN, he is average at best, but average qbs have won NCs.
My guess is he is under center vs. LSU. Richt won't sacrifice wins to start an inexperienced QB with potentially more upside. At least that is my thoughts. We have some monster classes lined up as of now.