forums

Potential Portal DB’s (CB’s & S’s only)

Memnon said:
Replacing a bad player with another bad player doesn't improve the room.

There's a ton of good serviceable CB's that could be brought in for the same purpose, that are still available who actually improve the room.

Trading one JAG for another JAG results in having a JAG in your CB rotation, which means when they're in the game, they're a liability.

And I don't think he's bad... I KNOW he is.
Click to expand...
Waste of breath bruh...same dudes thought we nailed the portal DBs last year too...
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Memnon said:
It's not a preconceived judgment.

ITS BASED ON HIS PLAY AT ARIZONA.
Click to expand...
Stop @Memnon

As fans we can’t hurt his feelings or we might affect his confidence and play like trash and it’ll be the fans fault. If we uplift him and encourage him, he might just play well for us despite previous performances.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Memnon said:
I never said I was perfect & my comment I had nothing to do with my own personal view of EK.

My point was, you said people would still be *****ing about EK if we landed Tacario & I pointed out why people were *****ing about EK in the first place.

Here's the facts:

View attachment 315881View attachment 315882View attachment 315883View attachment 315884View attachment 315885View attachment 315886View attachment 315887View attachment 315888View attachment 315889View attachment 315890View attachment 315891View attachment 315892

That's not my personal opinion, that's the empirical data concerning EK.

How does someone watch his film & come away with anything other than what the data shows, is a work of mental gymnastics & trying to create a narrative in order to sell people on the idea of overlooking the data & the film.

There is no objective way to watch EK's film & come away with any other conclusion, it's simply not possible. So how does someone watch bad film & come away with a "positive" outlook on it?

That's all I'm saying. And that's why people are reacting that way, because it's commensurate to the actual play that they're seeing.

You notice how people didn't react that way when Brantley committed? Isn't it weird how pretty much the entire board thought it was a good pick up? You know why? Because there's proof in data & on film that he's actually a good CB.

You know why people have been feeling the opposite about EK, because there isn't any.
Click to expand...
Dude was coming at everybody that’s been saying the same thing. I made one of the first posts when d$ put it out there. I watched a few of his games and kid was underwhelming and I said as much. Numbers only seem to matter when it’s building a narrative that suits certain people.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top