Interesting to read the reasonings for who and why ______ should be or not be the starting QB.
"Gives us the best chance to win" -- despite inconsistency?
put another way "most experienced" -- at what, throwing into double coverage?
demonstrated he's not up to the job -- yet freshman/redshirt freshman has?
judged on limited body of work -- vs no body of work?
"He couldn't win the job" -- JH vs SM anyone?
"holds UM passing records" -- KF, KW, JH anyone?
"has an NFL arm" -- and a peewee brain?
"hits the long ball" -- struggles to convert third down plays?
Don't know if any of the folks holding these views actually are in a position to know. I may have missed on some of these or be wrong, but I suspect I'm better than _____ demonstrated third down efficiency.
It's all very confusing.