I hope these reporters keep digging. There is more out there if they do.
How the ***** does this not come up in the investigation? Imagine what else they missed. If this didnt **** me off so badly I would be laughing my *** off
KP, I don't think it's the reporters necessarily finding this info. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Don Donna's squad is digging like Agamemnon Busmalis on this case. Don Donna is finding all the **** she can find and putting it out there to be disseminated.
Actually, from a PR standpoint (and while reporters will keep on digging) what will be worse for the NCAA is for a ponzi-fraud victim to come forward to criticise the NCAA not for the matters under investigation, no bias from the victim here, but rather for what the NCAA did with and for a criminal, who defrauded innocent victims:
first, and under what right, did the NCAA intervene in Shapiro's sentenc ing in a manner calculated to get him less prison time. If I were one of those victims i'd be furious. Let him rot in prison, for as long as possible, for stealing from me and my family. Why did they intervene? Really none of the NCAA's business. The NCAA traded a "favor", to secure a lighter sentence for Shapiro, to get something from him, something that was completely outside the scope of Shapiro's crime and the completely outside the scope of his personal responsibility for that crime. What right did they have to do this?
Second, the NCAA caused needless litigation in a bankruptcy proceeding, a proceeding designed in part to recover money for victims defrauded by Shapiro. That needless litigation is paid for our of the bankruptcy estate, the very money that victims should get back.What right did the NCAA have to intervene in this matter? The move had nothing to do with concern or respect for the victim/creditors, the court or justice, the move was in total derrogation of proper process and remedies.
Third, the NCAA gave Shapiro financial support (money) commisary deposits, a burn phone, and paid Shapiro's lawyer ostensibly (but not really) for Shapiro's legal benefit. If I'm a victim I'm asking did the NCAA tell the bankruptcy judge that Shapiro was to be given funds? Should those monies have gone to repay victims?
A fraud/victim's criticism of the NCAA along these lines is unassailable and indefensible from a PR standpoint for the NCAA. The criticiscm from this source would have nothing, nothing to do with the facts of the investigation. I only highlights the NCAA's improper conduct and disregard for the victims of crime!
ALL this by the NCAA to buy testimony! Improper conduct for an improper reason.
drip, drip, drip.... If the ncaa had brain one it would settle this thing