How do those numbers look if you slide the timeline by ten years? I get that it’s a 20 year look, but a ton of talent came to UM during the early 2000’s as we were coming off the run. Specifically, the 04 and 05 drafts had guys that were on the ‘01 team.
I prefer to look at raw data and draw my own conclusions rather than scan pre digested results and percentages. No, I don’t mean this as a slam against Rell. I do mean that I don’t know who was included from the elite draftees and who was excluded. I also am curious how the numbers look when 04-14 is removed.
Does it matter? I’m not ****ting on ur ?, rather asking does it matter when I slide the timeline? The point was in 20 yrs we’ve had not 1 ACC crown despite the personnel. So let’s say for instance I slide the timeline from 2004-2014, the results would be even more damning, considering that was the era we produced the most NFL picks.
However, I’m a fair, reasonable, & equitable poster; so let’s slide the scale to fit 2015 - present:
1. Clemson - 55 total draft picks (28 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
2. Miami - 45 total draft picks (12 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
3. FSU - 42 total draft picks (22 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
4. Pitt - 29 total draft picks (7 w/in the 1st 3rd Rds)
5. UNC - 28 total draft picks (9 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
6. UL - 27 total draft picks (11 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
7. NCSt - 25 total draft picks (11 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
8. VT - 23 total draft picks (7 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
9. BC - 21 total draft picks (12 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
10. WF - 15 total draft picks (4 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
11. UVA - 12 total draft picks (3 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
12. GT - 11 total draft picks (2 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
13. Duke - 10 total draft picks (4 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
14. Syracuse - 9 total draft picks (4 w/in the 1st 3 Rds)
So allow me to pause this graphic real quick; this is y I hate when add’l ?’s r ask when I present a detailed post, b/c now it opens up a new can of worms.
As u can see, we’re still Top 3 in the conference in either total draft picks & total quality picks; however, now a new glaring indictment has been shined on the myth of not having enough talent:
Looking at the Top 10 in this category, 6 comes from the old ACC Atlantic Division. That means our talent compared to the ACC Coastal has been far superior, yet here’s our record vs. The Coastal since 2015: 33-20 (.622)
•7-2 v. UVA
•7-2 v. VT
•6-2 v. Pitt
•6-3 v. Duke
•5-4 v. GT
•2-7 v. UNC
Recruiting Avg. rankings:
1. Clemson - 11th
2. Miami - 12th
3. FSU - 13th
4. UNC - 25th
T-5. UL - 39th
T-5. VT - 39th
7. NCSt - 42nd
8. Pitt - 48th
9. GT - 49th
10. UVA - 55th
11. Duke - 56th
12. Syracuse - 58th
13. BC - 62nd
14. WF - 65th
And jic, even if I were to remove the class rankings of 2023 & 2024 from this equation, our avg. class rank from 2015-2022 is 14th, which is still top 3 in the conference & would be by far #1 in the old ACC Coastal division.
So it doesn’t matter how U slide the scale, it doesn’t matter the era, the coach, the excuse of “not enough talent” is just that, an excuse & could easily be labeled as a myth.