More words of Wisdom off the insidetheuboard by coach No d

[Ibis]

5 wins, 7 wins, 9 wins

Randy Shannon in year 3

Caveman logic at its finest.

Trending upward baby! It just eats you up that Golden and Coach D are going to be successful at Miami while all you've done is bad mouth them. I love it!
Go mope somewhere's else.

When I bump this thread in the fall, I hope you will be back.

I could give two shyts what some mopey, whiney, know nothing, revisionist history loser such as yourself does in the fall.

So basically if you're wrong, you won't be showing up to eat crow.

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

 

[Ibis]

D:ck head butch had to do this with sanctions ,two different animals

Excuse me but Golden was handed a dumpster fire and inherited an NCAA investigation from Radio along with it. You mopes say that BS but forget Butch was able to recruit players to track scholarships and other tricks to make it work. Remember Santana Moss coming to Miami on a track scholarship? Duh!

You clowns refuse to accept that the situations are similar because that blows huge holes in your fabricated BS. Mope on mopes!

When AG and his buddy do something worth talking about get back to me. Only thing he has accomplished at Miami is allowing the worse D in history and being able to come up with excuse after excuse to explain away his ****ty D.

Oh is that you're response to not knowing about football players being on track scholies while Butch was HC? Good one!

Again, can any of you mopes please tell me about all these great players who's talents were waisted coach D? Please show me all these studs that they were supposed to field a championship defense with.

Agenda driven revisionist history mopes! Mope on mopes...

Davis bringing in a Player or two on a track scholarship just shows his line of thinking. He did what he had to do. Even then he still had better players than Golden has and produced better results in terms of quality wins etc but I'm not even gonna waste time comparing the two. It's like comparing a mansions to a mouse hole.

You're getting pretty upset about golden not accomplishing anything here.

Nights, you and your mopey circle jerk crew could never upset me. As usual you bring nothing to the conversation other than conjured up BS.

You and the mopes are going to be very upset when Golden is here for a very long time.

 

[BALLHAWKU]

only if he wins if not i would bet he will be gone in two years

 

[Jedi Master Cane]

He seemed reserved during the interview.

No matter what he says fans will criticize.

He built a good D at Temple, so I still hold hope.

For the love of sanity...these Don Bailey Jr disciples citing his Temple "success"

They played Lourdes 3 times a year, St Brendan's twice, and Ransom Everglades. If you don't realize by now that the famous "9 win" season isn't the biggest fraud of all time...I don't know what to tell you. Homeboy never even won that ****** *** conference.

He belongs at a small program playing against small opponents. This stage is too big for these 2.

 

[Ibis]

only if he wins if not i would bet he will be gone in two years

We'll see...

 

[DeadPoets]

He seemed reserved during the interview.

No matter what he says fans will criticize.

He built a good D at Temple, so I still hold hope.

Biggest myth in all of sports is that they built a good D at Temple.
They went from Big East to the MAAC (worst conference at the time), had the worst schedule in CFB, and got blown out by any offense with a pulse.

Most overrated turn around job in the history of CFB.

Notice Temple is BACK in the big east and back to svcking again.

 

[BALLHAWKU]

only if he wins if not i would bet he will be gone in two years

We'll see...

Next year if the D blows his buddy will gone after that it will be him . Hopefully he can turn things around because i am tired of seeing my team sucking

 

[DeadPoets]

only if he wins if not i would bet he will be gone in two years

We'll see...

Next year if the D blows his buddy will gone after that it will be him . Hopefully he can turn things around because i am tired of seeing my team sucking

Anything less than 9-3 and Golden is gone with him.

 

[poncho0091]

Trending upward baby! It just eats you up that Golden and Coach D are going to be successful at Miami while all you've done is bad mouth them. I love it!
Go mope somewhere's else.

When I bump this thread in the fall, I hope you will be back.

I could give two shyts what some mopey, whiney, know nothing, revisionist history loser such as yourself does in the fall.

So basically if you're wrong, you won't be showing up to eat crow.

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

 

[BrazilCane]

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

One of the best post I read in CIS, poncho0091. I will + rep when I can...

 

[Ibis]

When I bump this thread in the fall, I hope you will be back.

I could give two shyts what some mopey, whiney, know nothing, revisionist history loser such as yourself does in the fall.

So basically if you're wrong, you won't be showing up to eat crow.

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

 

[Jedi Master Cane]

When I bump this thread in the fall, I hope you will be back.

I could give two shyts what some mopey, whiney, know nothing, revisionist history loser such as yourself does in the fall.

So basically if you're wrong, you won't be showing up to eat crow.

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Preach

 

[poncho0091]

I could give two shyts what some mopey, whiney, know nothing, revisionist history loser such as yourself does in the fall.

So basically if you're wrong, you won't be showing up to eat crow.

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

 

[Ibis]

So basically if you're wrong, you won't be showing up to eat crow.

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

Whatever you say Sancho. Don't you and the circle jerking mopes "CJM's" have a coaching staff to bash? Go keep it real bruh. Why spend any time back and forth with anybody with a differing opinion than you clowns? Got to make sure the mope message rings loud and clear?

If the coaching staff is as bad as you mopes claim then you would think as big of fans as you all are you'd look to the positives to at least help recruiting? Never mind, you CJM's got this. Bash away! You're doing a great service to the program you claim to support so vehemently. I know, I know, just applying pressure to run Golden out of town because you mopes know best. What a noble cause.

 

[BrazilCane]

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.


You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

Whatever you say Sancho. Don't you and the circle jerking mopes "CJM's" have a coaching staff to bash? Go keep it real bruh. Why spend any time back and forth with anybody with a differing opinion than you clowns? Got to make sure the mope message rings loud and clear?

If the coaching staff is as bad as you mopes claim then you would think as big of fans as you all are you'd look to the positives to at least help recruiting? Never mind, you CJM's got this. Bash away! You're doing a great service to the program you claim to support so vehemently. I know, I know, just applying pressure to run Golden out of town because you mopes know best. What a noble cause.

You just got owned by a post full of facts and came with the lame excuse you did not read?!? :ibisroflmao:



Clearly a troll or a ******.

 

[Ibis]

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.


You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

Whatever you say Sancho. Don't you and the circle jerking mopes "CJM's" have a coaching staff to bash? Go keep it real bruh. Why spend any time back and forth with anybody with a differing opinion than you clowns? Got to make sure the mope message rings loud and clear?

If the coaching staff is as bad as you mopes claim then you would think as big of fans as you all are you'd look to the positives to at least help recruiting? Never mind, you CJM's got this. Bash away! You're doing a great service to the program you claim to support so vehemently. I know, I know, just applying pressure to run Golden out of town because you mopes know best. What a noble cause.

You just got owned by a post full of facts and came with the lame excuse you did not read?!? :ibisroflmao:



Clearly a troll or a ******.

Oh noes! I was clearly owned by a circle jerking mope because another circle jerking mope says so. Debating with circle jerking mopes is serious bidness...

 

[BigDikCane]

And if I'm right you mopes can just change your tune and claim that you just wanted the program to succeed and were keeping it real. That is what the stupid asses did back when Butch succeeded. They couldn't understand why he lied to them while hauling *** to the NFL after they flew the banners and tried to publicly humiliate him.

I don't think most of you are Miami fans anyway. Have to be a bunch of trolls.

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

Whatever you say Sancho. Don't you and the circle jerking mopes "CJM's" have a coaching staff to bash? Go keep it real bruh. Why spend any time back and forth with anybody with a differing opinion than you clowns? Got to make sure the mope message rings loud and clear?

If the coaching staff is as bad as you mopes claim then you would think as big of fans as you all are you'd look to the positives to at least help recruiting? Never mind, you CJM's got this. Bash away! You're doing a great service to the program you claim to support so vehemently. I know, I know, just applying pressure to run Golden out of town because you mopes know best. What a noble cause.

f**k Golden...

 

[Ibis]

I'll be glad to admit I was wrong if it means we are respectable again. Problem is you supporters try to spin any fact you can while ignoring the ones that expose those facts as window dressing.

You keep saying that they had this great defense, but ignore the fact that those defenses played the worst offenses in college football.

You say they turned around a program but ignore the fact that Temple was recently dropped to the MAC from the Big East.

You say that defense looked good and got us to 7-0, but ignore the fact that the first 5 teams we played had no passing game which means we didn't have to plan strongly against the pass and we could just load up the box. The next 2 teams were a garbage UNC and WF team that both nearly beat us. Every team we played that had anything close to an average passing game, looked like absolute stud offenses against us. These teams had better passing against us than they did the scrub teams we played.

You say our defense limited Florida, but ignore that Florida had one of their best passing games of the season against us and their passing game is absolute garbage. We got a couple picks because Driskell sucks.

You say we are expecting elite defense overnight. The problem is noone is asking for elite defense. I didn't realize asking for a defense not in the bottom quarter of NCAA defenses when we played a pretty weak schedule was too much to ask. We only played 2 teams with really good offense. Everyone else was crap, or average at best.

You want to use the fact that all these professional analyst are glowing over Golden and that counts over the opinions of the people on the board. Fair enough, but those same analysts also favored Miami as the clear favorites to win the Coastal this year. This means according to these same analyst, Golden failed miserably. The coastal has not been this week in a long time and Golden failed.

You say we don't have talent, but these professional analyst who rank the recruiting classes say we have recruited far better (even during the cloud) than every team we played except for maybe FSU and Florida. Are you saying these analyst who know more than us are wrong now, because it doesn't fit your point or did Golden fail at development?

Stop cherry picking your arguments. Every Golden pro has been countered with a factual con. Not every con has been countered yet with something better than "the cloud". 3 years is not overnight, its enough time to field a respectable defense. I would have been satisfied with a top 60 defense this year. Is that elite? Is that asking for too much after 3 years? IMO top 60 is not even good, but its not a complete embarrassment.

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

Whatever you say Sancho. Don't you and the circle jerking mopes "CJM's" have a coaching staff to bash? Go keep it real bruh. Why spend any time back and forth with anybody with a differing opinion than you clowns? Got to make sure the mope message rings loud and clear?

If the coaching staff is as bad as you mopes claim then you would think as big of fans as you all are you'd look to the positives to at least help recruiting? Never mind, you CJM's got this. Bash away! You're doing a great service to the program you claim to support so vehemently. I know, I know, just applying pressure to run Golden out of town because you mopes know best. What a noble cause.

f**k Golden...

That was deep bruh. Good one! The circle jerking mope clan will be proud of yahs.

Miama fans keep dat **** real dog!

 

[252cane]

Ibis, what is the excuse at uva? They had chris long who is a pro bowler and was the 2nd overall pick in the draft, they had ahmad brooks who is a all pro olb, chris canty and few other guys that went to the nfl from there defense and under golden they only have 1 good year and when he left they had like two straight top 25 defenses.

 

[BrazilCane]

Did not read...

Of course you didn't read. Its funny, because the entire thing is about guys like you blindly dodging the facts. You said we will change our tune and say we were keeping it real and that its because we are trolls who are not "real" Miami fans. Well everything I stated in there is real and they are facts. Maybe you are the troll and as a troll you are not a "real" Miami fan, because you seem to enjoy watching the team wallow in mediocrity.

I'll say it again, I will root for Golden to succeed, but I've lost faith that this staff will get it done.

Whatever you say Sancho. Don't you and the circle jerking mopes "CJM's" have a coaching staff to bash? Go keep it real bruh. Why spend any time back and forth with anybody with a differing opinion than you clowns? Got to make sure the mope message rings loud and clear?

If the coaching staff is as bad as you mopes claim then you would think as big of fans as you all are you'd look to the positives to at least help recruiting? Never mind, you CJM's got this. Bash away! You're doing a great service to the program you claim to support so vehemently. I know, I know, just applying pressure to run Golden out of town because you mopes know best. What a noble cause.

You just got owned by a post full of facts and came with the lame excuse you did not read?!? :ibisroflmao:



Clearly a troll or a ******.

Oh noes! I was clearly owned by a circle jerking mope because another circle jerking mope says so. Debating with circle jerking mopes is serious bidness...