Canemang
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 7,525
4 pages of a stupid thread.
Couldn't agree more, OP is full of chit
4 pages of a stupid thread.
4 pages of a stupid thread.
Couldn't agree more, OP is full of chit
Difference is richt is a "bigtime" coach bog time staff no waiting period so far terrible results
So he goes 8-4 and lost one game by more than 7 points, top 20 class in first year with no depth and the results are terrible? Your a dumb *** too
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It took me less than a year to see golden was trash and richt is not far behind�� been on the job a year and you what a banner...oy!
I don't like it but change isn't going to happen in a year maybe not even 2.
It took me less than a year to see golden was trash and richt is not far behind�� been on the job a year and you what a banner...oy!
I don't like it but change isn't going to happen in a year maybe not even 2.
Love this board except there are some real dumb posters on it.
The angst is not about one player.All this over not landing a 3* midget who wasn't committed to us in the first place?
Jesus, if Donaldson was to flip on NSD then we'd have a problem. For now pull the sand out your crotches and man the fūck up ladies.
I believe it is fair to question the evaluation skills of this staff.
Bandy is a legit, obvious stud. Took far too long.
Harley is a very good fit in our offense. We offered some slugs ahead of him and were way too late.
Slaton took far too long to get prioritized.
RB recruiting right now has been mediocre.
There is a long list. In my mind, these guys need to be identified a year ahead of time and prioritized correctly. Always room for pop-up guys, but the way they'd done it is very confusing to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow, I can't stand this place. Two of the ESPN top 8 RB's are likely to be Canes and this is "mediocre".
The angst is not about one player.All this over not landing a 3* midget who wasn't committed to us in the first place?
Jesus, if Donaldson was to flip on NSD then we'd have a problem. For now pull the sand out your crotches and man the fūck up ladies.
That's setting a pretty low bar. We have one WR committed in this class. One.The angst is not about one player.All this over not landing a 3* midget who wasn't committed to us in the first place?
Jesus, if Donaldson was to flip on NSD then we'd have a problem. For now pull the sand out your crotches and man the fūck up ladies.
Who have we lost? Not "failed to flip" but Actual LOSS as in committed then decommitted.
The angst is not about one player.All this over not landing a 3* midget who wasn't committed to us in the first place?
Jesus, if Donaldson was to flip on NSD then we'd have a problem. For now pull the sand out your crotches and man the fūck up ladies.
Who have we lost? Not "failed to flip" but Actual LOSS as in committed then decommitted.
What's depressing, is Trump will be halfway through his second term before we get an Offensive Coordinator.
Like real schools.
But I'm not going to say anything. Not gonna say it.
I believe it is fair to question the evaluation skills of this staff.
Bandy is a legit, obvious stud. Took far too long.
Harley is a very good fit in our offense. We offered some slugs ahead of him and were way too late.
Slaton took far too long to get prioritized.
RB recruiting right now has been mediocre.
There is a long list. In my mind, these guys need to be identified a year ahead of time and prioritized correctly. Always room for pop-up guys, but the way they'd done it is very confusing to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow, I can't stand this place. Two of the ESPN top 8 RB's are likely to be Canes and this is "mediocre".
I don't believe I said anything especially incendiary, but my thought process is I'm not a huge fan of Burns. The right now was an obvious qualifier if we land McFarland, it will be better. I do like him.
As for recruiting rankings, I personally do not look at them. I want to be able to watch a player with as clear a lens as possible.
Finally, my post had nothing to do with anything about the evaluation skills of this staff thus far at Miami. Right now, I think it's fair to ask questions. If saying it's fair to ask questions is incendiary and makes you hate this place, I certainly respect your right to put me on ignore.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe it is fair to question the evaluation skills of this staff.
Bandy is a legit, obvious stud. Took far too long.
Harley is a very good fit in our offense. We offered some slugs ahead of him and were way too late.
Slaton took far too long to get prioritized.
RB recruiting right now has been mediocre.
There is a long list. In my mind, these guys need to be identified a year ahead of time and prioritized correctly. Always room for pop-up guys, but the way they'd done it is very confusing to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow, I can't stand this place. Two of the ESPN top 8 RB's are likely to be Canes and this is "mediocre".
I don't believe I said anything especially incendiary, but my thought process is I'm not a huge fan of Burns. The right now was an obvious qualifier if we land McFarland, it will be better. I do like him.
As for recruiting rankings, I personally do not look at them. I want to be able to watch a player with as clear a lens as possible.
Finally, my post had nothing to do with anything about the evaluation skills of this staff thus far at Miami. Right now, I think it's fair to ask questions. If saying it's fair to ask questions is incendiary and makes you hate this place, I certainly respect your right to put me on ignore.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok, so you view Burns as mediocre and McFarland as not coming. Let's flag this thread for later use.
I believe it is fair to question the evaluation skills of this staff.
Bandy is a legit, obvious stud. Took far too long.
Harley is a very good fit in our offense. We offered some slugs ahead of him and were way too late.
Slaton took far too long to get prioritized.
RB recruiting right now has been mediocre.
There is a long list. In my mind, these guys need to be identified a year ahead of time and prioritized correctly. Always room for pop-up guys, but the way they'd done it is very confusing to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wow, I can't stand this place. Two of the ESPN top 8 RB's are likely to be Canes and this is "mediocre".
I don't believe I said anything especially incendiary, but my thought process is I'm not a huge fan of Burns. The right now was an obvious qualifier if we land McFarland, it will be better. I do like him.
As for recruiting rankings, I personally do not look at them. I want to be able to watch a player with as clear a lens as possible.
Finally, my post had nothing to do with anything about the evaluation skills of this staff thus far at Miami. Right now, I think it's fair to ask questions. If saying it's fair to ask questions is incendiary and makes you hate this place, I certainly respect your right to put me on ignore.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok, so you view Burns as mediocre and McFarland as not coming. Let's flag this thread for later use.
Obvious issues with reading.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk