- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 4,089
I miss the retired Dan Bylsma gif. THAT should be re-born due to our recent increase in stature.
Wish I had that one.....
I miss the retired Dan Bylsma gif. THAT should be re-born due to our recent increase in stature.
Wish I had that one.....
Just sounds like you're rationalizing a recruiting failure.His fault for not having a back upIF Mac chooses Maryland, I don't see how it's going to be Browns fault. He's clearly done everything he can to get this kid to Miami, he's been all over him for over a year now. He had him in the bag and never let up. Obviously something sketchy happen if he's now prepared to choose the sorry *** Terps.
His fault yes...BUT sometimes there is a kid you are 100% sure about...The way you are with all the 100% that do commit. And then that kid shocks the **** out of you and does unthinkable.
But I can excuse Brown this once because it's obvious he thought kid was not just a lean, but a lock (I think the kid thought he was a lock too)...
A. If it comes a pattern with Brown, then obv it's a prob
B. They are following AJ Davis and may have interest there all of a sudden
C. RB is a need--yes. BUT it is not a dire need the way OL, WR, CB are this cycle...I hate having to trust Burns as a 4...But we have a solid top 2, choc as the 3 if he doesn't get past by Burns, and then I think you will see a Dallas or Mullins type as the emergency at 5 if multiple injuries happen. (DeeJay coming in at 205 supposedly?). Again that's just a hypothetical
it goes down as a ***** up but could it have been avoided?? the only thing they could or should have done is to have had another comparable prospect teed up and ready and then they could have told one to commit or lose the spot.
Maryland 24/7 mod is getting good McFarland vibes...
I think we all know where this is heading.
Lots of good vibes ...
Just sounds like you're rationalizing a recruiting failure.His fault for not having a back up
His fault yes...BUT sometimes there is a kid you are 100% sure about...The way you are with all the 100% that do commit. And then that kid shocks the **** out of you and does unthinkable.
But I can excuse Brown this once because it's obvious he thought kid was not just a lean, but a lock (I think the kid thought he was a lock too)...
A. If it comes a pattern with Brown, then obv it's a prob
B. They are following AJ Davis and may have interest there all of a sudden
C. RB is a need--yes. BUT it is not a dire need the way OL, WR, CB are this cycle...I hate having to trust Burns as a 4...But we have a solid top 2, choc as the 3 if he doesn't get past by Burns, and then I think you will see a Dallas or Mullins type as the emergency at 5 if multiple injuries happen. (DeeJay coming in at 205 supposedly?). Again that's just a hypothetical
it goes down as a ***** up but could it have been avoided?? the only thing they could or should have done is to have had another comparable prospect teed up and ready and then they could have told one to commit or lose the spot.
Only recruiting (and missing on) one player at a position of need? Yes, that is an avoidable '***** up'.
Just sounds like you're rationalizing a recruiting failure.His fault for not having a back upIF Mac chooses Maryland, I don't see how it's going to be Browns fault. He's clearly done everything he can to get this kid to Miami, he's been all over him for over a year now. He had him in the bag and never let up. Obviously something sketchy happen if he's now prepared to choose the sorry *** Terps.
His fault yes...BUT sometimes there is a kid you are 100% sure about...The way you are with all the 100% that do commit. And then that kid shocks the **** out of you and does unthinkable.
But I can excuse Brown this once because it's obvious he thought kid was not just a lean, but a lock (I think the kid thought he was a lock too)...
A. If it comes a pattern with Brown, then obv it's a prob
B. They are following AJ Davis and may have interest there all of a sudden
C. RB is a need--yes. BUT it is not a dire need the way OL, WR, CB are this cycle...I hate having to trust Burns as a 4...But we have a solid top 2, choc as the 3 if he doesn't get past by Burns, and then I think you will see a Dallas or Mullins type as the emergency at 5 if multiple injuries happen. (DeeJay coming in at 205 supposedly?). Again that's just a hypothetical
never trust the silent commit
The guy that hasn't played in two years? KJust sounds like you're rationalizing a recruiting failure.His fault yes...BUT sometimes there is a kid you are 100% sure about...The way you are with all the 100% that do commit. And then that kid shocks the **** out of you and does unthinkable.
But I can excuse Brown this once because it's obvious he thought kid was not just a lean, but a lock (I think the kid thought he was a lock too)...
A. If it comes a pattern with Brown, then obv it's a prob
B. They are following AJ Davis and may have interest there all of a sudden
C. RB is a need--yes. BUT it is not a dire need the way OL, WR, CB are this cycle...I hate having to trust Burns as a 4...But we have a solid top 2, choc as the 3 if he doesn't get past by Burns, and then I think you will see a Dallas or Mullins type as the emergency at 5 if multiple injuries happen. (DeeJay coming in at 205 supposedly?). Again that's just a hypothetical
it goes down as a ***** up but could it have been avoided?? the only thing they could or should have done is to have had another comparable prospect teed up and ready and then they could have told one to commit or lose the spot.
Only recruiting (and missing on) one player at a position of need? Yes, that is an avoidable '***** up'.
They recruited 2 guys, and have already signed one.
The guy that hasn't played in two years? KJust sounds like you're rationalizing a recruiting failure.
it goes down as a ***** up but could it have been avoided?? the only thing they could or should have done is to have had another comparable prospect teed up and ready and then they could have told one to commit or lose the spot.
Only recruiting (and missing on) one player at a position of need? Yes, that is an avoidable '***** up'.
They recruited 2 guys, and have already signed one.
I miss the retired Dan Bylsma gif. THAT should be re-born due to our recent increase in stature.
Wish I had that one.....
I would have to assume if we don't get McFarland it's easier to land Lingard especially since our depth chart is way more appealing at this point
Welp. Could just be building suspense but I'm officially flaccid.Not the most timely tweet from our guy...
[TWEET]824685360605175810[/TWEET]