You just told me to grow up in the same breath as recounting likes lmao — and your recollection is false; not that it matters who likes whoever’s posts.
Just like your claim of me being a stan for our AD is false. Use the search function.
Idk wtf you’re on lol. I didn’t post until Lucas got the job. Therefore, by definition, the other candidates were no longer candidates.
I also was intrigued/expressed approval of Chris Quinn being a finalist. I didn’t post about Fizdale although I would have been fine/happy with him as well.
You’re a hoe because you won’t call a spade a spade. You’re talking out of both sides of your mouth; You’re tryna say the hiring of Lucas is trash and the Lucas hire wasn’t a bad hire at the same time.
As you've proven, you don't read posts closely, and you definitely don't quote posts accurately.
So it's time to blow up your bull****.
First, the "likes" are at the bottom of the post. Near where you hit "Reply". So, yes, it is fairly easy to see "cookies likes JZCane0825" and "JZCane0825 likes cookies", particularly when you guys are the only ones liking each other's posts.
Not sure where I "claimed you were a stan of our AD". I don't think anyone is. On the other hand, you're a stan of Jai Lucas's, and you are acting as if Radakovich's process yielded a great hire, so that's on you.
And look at you with your lies. "I didn't post until Lucas got the job". And then in the next paragraph "I expressed approval of Chris Quinn being a finalist". You can't even lie very well.
Finally, I'm a "hoe". What is this, 1989? Or did you just overdo it with the garden-implements references, between hoes and spades? I don't know what in the **** you are even talking about. I have consistently, for weeks, said that I object to UM's PROCESS of hiring Lucas. I have consistently, for weeks, cited the reasons. Too rushed, too "focused on only one candidate", definitely should have had prior head coaching experience as a job requirement. But I refuse to root against a UM hire merely because I disagree with the hiring process. ****, for about 5 minutes two years ago, I actually gave JD Arteaga a chance of succeeding.
This is the problem with you binary *******, you think you can only have two polar-opposite opinions. "Trash hire" or "great hire". I'm one of the few honest people involved in this thread who is willing to admit to mixed feelings. I don't know if Lucas will succeed or fail. I believe that OTHER coaches not named Jai Lucas could also succeed with an $8M NIL budget. And I have presented ample evidence that Miami, and the ACC, and the SEC...all have greater success rates when hiring candidates with prior head coaching experience.
And who knows, maybe Miami will be the unicorn that enjoys wild success under a first-time head coach. It could happen. That doesn't erase the concerns I have with UM's "the fix is in" hiring process.