forums

If true brace yourself

SigEp77 said:
If true, time for Shalala to call on some political favors. You know, maybe Mr. Emmert gets a number of IRS audits. Some dirt digging etc.
Click to expand...

Time for Donna to lawyer up and bring her political connects with her.
 
Advertisement
gonna have to go get another beer now. just when it seemed like we were getting to the end. fml
 
LOL jesus the NCAA is a ******* joke.

AND, **** you NCAA, do you know another University of Miami? No **** it's in Florida. There is no other University of Miami dip****s.

This organization is a self-righteous ***goty group. I hope these attorneys mount up and do work.
 
Advertisement
Barry Jackson usually sucks, but he gets love for getting this bull**** out there. We need to make sure this letter gets spread around so everyone can see what the NCAA is trying to do.
 
“If we do not hear back from you or your clients by that time, the staff will consider the non-response as your client’s admission of involvement in NCAA violations.

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...phins-marlins-heat-chatter.html#storylink=cpy

Everyone who receives such a letter should timely respond to Ms. Richman with a brief letter simply stating, generally, that "my client does not admit involvement in the alleged NCAA violations."

If the NCAA want to play this b.s. game to try and skirt the limits of its jurisdiction, it should not be very difficult for those with legal counsel (or just a bit of sense) to kill that noise. As bad as it would seem if the NCAA uses this 'admission by silence' tactic as a basis to rely upon the allegations of a felon and well-known con artist, it will look that much worse to have to say 'well, yeah they responded to our letter, and its true they said they don't actually admit anything, but since they wouldn't meet with us, testify under oath, and bow to our every demand, we're still going to rely on the convicted liar.'

If people think this through and perhaps work together (instead of panicking for no reason), this will not have the effect the NCAA apparently hopes it will. Frankly, it looks like a desperation move and it should be treated accordingly.
 
so basically the ncaa doesnt have any proof and we have been banning ourself's for no reason, they gotta come up with some proof or something to say to the media, so there gonna say if players dont come forward that everything shapiro said was true and we'll get punished for that. there forcing the players to come forward so they have some real evidence. if everyone keeps there mouth closed miami should sue the ncaa for having these so called allegations over the program costing them money recruits and bowl games.
 
Advertisement
Jonnyblaze said:
Barry Jackson usually sucks, but he gets love for getting this bull**** out there. We need to make sure this letter gets spread around so everyone can see what the NCAA is trying to do.
Click to expand...


I don't belive in coincidences , and I dont trust Barry Jackson !
 
MiamiVice7 said:
“If we do not hear back from you or your clients by that time, the staff will consider the non-response as your client’s admission of involvement in NCAA violations.

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...phins-marlins-heat-chatter.html#storylink=cpy

Everyone who receives such a letter should timely respond to Ms. Richman with a brief letter simply stating, generally, that "my client does not admit involvement in the alleged NCAA violations."

If the NCAA want to play this b.s. game to try and skirt the limits of its jurisdiction, it should not be very difficult for those with legal counsel (or just a bit of sense) to kill that noise. As bad as it would seem if the NCAA uses this 'admission by silence' tactic as a basis to rely upon the allegations of a felon and well-known con artist, it will look that much worse to have to say 'well, yeah they responded to our letter, and its true they said they don't actually admit anything, but since they wouldn't meet with us, testify under oath, and bow to our every demand, we're still going to rely on the convicted liar.'

If people think this through and perhaps work together (instead of panicking for no reason), this will not have the effect the NCAA apparently hopes it will. Frankly, it looks like a desperation move and it should be treated accordingly.
Click to expand...

True, but it just drives home the point none of us want to be true: the NCAA can do whatever the **** they want, even if there doesn't seem to be that much evidence.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top