The real question is will the Shannonites be satiated with a D'Onofrio firing, or does the quest to avenge their hero only end in Al's demise?
(Do tell us, 82, poncho, TP, etc etc)
Well since I'm not a shannonite, this question is for someone else to answer. The problem with those blindly supporting Golden are no better than those who supported Shannon. You people can't take your feelings out of this and look at the situation objectively. Objectively, Shannon got put out in his 4th year. He never had a full team of just his players (year 5 is when that happens, year 1 is the rebuild, year 2 is continue to rebuild and hopeful improvement on the field from the 2nd year guys, year 3 we better start looking like we are on track and the original freshman should be looking like potential NFL players now).
Shannon year 1, horrible as expected with all Coker's players (KW and Kirby). Year 2 was still not great, and lots of young players and busted veterans (Marve and Harris). Year 3, We looked like we were back. The swag was in effect. We finally had a decent OC in Whipple compared to Nix. We faded near the end, but still got 9 wins and nearly beat Wisconsin despite playing like crap. Year 4 immediate meltdown by the team and fanbase as the wheels fell off. Team looked disinterested and we just stopped showing up for every game. Everyone was too worried about their swag and didn't improve. The USF loss was the last straw, a team who wasn't that good and we had no business losing to. Even those who supported Shannon were jumping off the wagon and he was out.
Golden honestly had a free pass from everyone because of this whole NCAA thing. All he had to do was make it look like we were improving every year, seeing good player development and look like we were not a joke. If he could have done that, we could have hit year 4 with no more than 8 wins every year and he would still be safe as long as we looked like we were on the right track and not a joke.
Year 1. Despite 6 wins, we looked much different on the field. I think Fisch did wonders with Jacory. Our defense was decent (with Randy's leftovers) and Golden showed enthusiasm and excitement that Randy never had. Most everyone was happy. Year 2. 7 wins. Our defense was horrible, but everyone understood we were in a rebuild and lacked some talent and depth and were dealing with NCAA issues. Also our offense looked impressive and gave everyone hope that year 3 would be a big year especially with the soft *** schedule we had. Despite these issues, Golden had pulled in 2 solid recruiting classes. Year 3 Most expected anywhere between 8-10 wins. All we wanted was to see that our defense looked like it had improved, our young guys to look like they had improved, and to look like we were still on the upswing. Instead, Our defense went from WOAT last year and showed pretty much no improvement (our early schedule was nothing but running teams, so we could just stack the box, and we still gave up a lot of passing yards). Our offense changed. I don't know if it's better or worse now, but there is potential and we had injuries. Sometimes it looks real nice, and others it looks like crap. Just as bad as the defense though is our young guys do not appear to have improved and some of them look like they've just gotten slow and useless. We have chickillo for example who showed promise in year 1 and has progressively faded with each passing year. We're asking guys to cover way more space than they should be covering by basically giving the offense the first 5-7 yards of the field for free. Then we look like a joke against bad teams. We have become everyones heisman game.
I don't want everyone to be fired. I'm not a Golden hater, but I am concerned with what I have been seeing. We are in year 3 and our defense looks they are not improving. Even worse, since everyone wants to harp on our lack of talent, our players who were looking like they could be something are not showing improvement and in some cases declining. Shannon started with similar conditions to Golden in terms of talent. Why does Golden get a pass for lack of development and in game adjustments in year 3 when Shannon did not. Shannon with all his staff turnover still managed 9 wins like Golden in year 3. I guess if Golden gets 7 wins next year, he gets a pass while Shannon did not even though Golden's recruiting classes will be close to on par with Shannons. Everyone says Golden should be allowed enough time for a team with only his players an worse, some don't want his clock to start until after this season. Shannon did not get that.