- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Messages
- 20,887
1. With Zo in place, they’ve started running it more like a pro room. What I mean by that is they’ve emphasized eyes on players and talking with them in person.
Having to “look” the part is becoming more important than under previous staffs.
2. For the most part, I subscribe to the wisdom of the crowd as being true. Marketplaces- in aggregate- tend to outperform single entities in the long run. Several books have been written on it.
So, with that, my point is that overall, Miami isn’t going to beat the market SOLELY by trying to be smarter. Simply put, you need dudes. Dudes who have that vividness that your grandma could evaluate them. Watch Francis Mauigoa move at his size for an example.
Where you CAN beat the market is in single, individual pockets. The players 15-25 in your class. Emphasize edges, players who have traits that have proven to be 35% successful vs. 30% for their neighbors etc.
When I evaluate a Miami class (all I can do is speak for myself through my eyes), I would often say that “he would not be a take for me” on at least the bottom five players. Sometimes more.
Last year I had zero players I said wouldn’t be a take for me. This year I have one (Juan Minaya, but I acknowledge there is a dearth of tackles in 2023).
Winning against like-minded peers is all about finding edges. Variance will come into play and there’s nothing you can do about it, but having sound process in place might result in one extra key player per class than your competitors without that process. This might not sound like a lot, but can be a razor margin that builds on itself over time.
To finally answer: I think there is evidence to suggest this staff will evaluate better than recruiting sites will (beating the market). Keep in mind recruiting sites utilize offers to shape their rankings more than they do film, which means you are evaluating better than your peers if you’re beating the market.
As far as development goes, I’m not sure I can say I have much evidence that they develop better than their peers. I DO think there is evidence they can develop better than their predecessors. You saw several players take massive steps forward under the staff last year without too many steps back.
Strong work here. Thanks dude