Allow me to explain my stance (which is totally cool to disagree with of course):
Russell is a versatile player (7T SSDE/5T,4i,3T) who is already a bull. I'm a succor for an edge-setting SSDE who can hold up inside as well. He has actual tape spilling a run vs. a puller, actual tape holding up a gap and a half technique, actual tape with a long-arm controlling a T and coming off for a tackle. He has actual tape with eyes seeing the ball on fakes (rather than blindly chasing the ball fake). He has legitimate production against very good competition at a school important to recruiting.
Add to it the fact that more than half of sacks come off of motor (just simply chasing and playing hard the entire play) rather than speed or straight beating an OL and I like him fine. I cannot speak to his character, but that came up immediately when I spoke to someone who does have an opinion on his character.
Players that surpass their measurables almost always do so because of play character and work ethic.
Minaya, I get the appeal. He's a straight butt-kicker. It's difficult to be consistent in your words 100% of the time because you could find me saying in the past that the #1 thing I want to see from any OL is domination of HS players in 1-on-1 plays. Minaya has that and Plazz doesn't really have that on tape.
The difference for me is that Minaya does not have the feet or movement skills I'd prefer, personally. I spoke in an earlier post about looking for traits that move success percentage from 30% to 35% etc. and one of them for OL that my research has found is movement skills in the short shuttle. Plazz has that on tape, whereas Minaya does not.
I view Minaya as a lower probability player, with Plazz and Russell a tick higher percentiles of positive outcomes and that's where I make my evaluation decision.
As everyone knows, I get some wrong (I'd be rich if I didn't). Let's hope I'm wrong on Minaya and you and others can give me a hard time about it in a few years.