Finally Admit Lanning > Mario

Roster-improvement happens everywhere, except Clemson.

How about program trajectory and the culture inherited?
How about losing to freaking GT 2 years in a row...dude didn't learn to take a knee at Oregon and did the same thing here last year. He only had to win 1 of 2 vs GT and Syracuse to make the ACCCG.

Yeah, we went from 7-5 to 10-2 this year with the easiest schedule one could ever hope for and a GENERATIONAL QB and still didn't get it done.
 
Advertisement
How about losing to freaking GT 2 years in a row...dude didn't learn to take a knee at Oregon and did the same thing here last year. He only had to win 1 of 2 vs GT and Syracuse to make the ACCCG.

Yeah, we went from 7-5 to 10-2 this year with the easiest schedule one could ever hope for and a GENERATIONAL QB and still didn't get it done.

Who is responsible for getting us from 5 to 10 wins in two years?
 
Advertisement
While a change is probably needed, what next? If Mario can't lead us back, who can (and is willing to take this job)? We can't throw unlimited money like the Texas schools, Bama, Georgia, OSU can
That’s what I want to know as well
I’m all ears
But who the **** is out there that can get this team back on top of college football?
 
Advertisement
Number one offense
10-2
Heisman candidate

Did the defense sht the bed ? Absolutely

Laning walked into a team that had recently won 2 conference championships.

Mario walked into a team that had one 10 win season in 15 years and never won their conference and only appeared in the championship once and got demolished.

Laning walked into a school whose athletic facilities look like a **** Scandinavian spa.

Saying they inherited similar situations is mainstream media level lies.
 
I think the question was "Can you identify particular game-day coaching issues that impacted the outcome of today's game?"
He's the head coach. When a team can't put 60 minutes of football together, it's on the head coach. Mario is the world's worst when it comes to command of a game. It's not just about, "He should have done this instead of that". It's about his entire approach being wrong. It's about playing down to every team we face, regardless of talent discrepancy. It's not just in game decisions, like kicking a FG, then not trying an onside kick. It's about getting the most out of his talent the other 56+ minutes so it never comes down to that.

He does less with more than any coach out there.
 
Advertisement
He's the head coach. When a team can't put 60 minutes of football together, it's on the head coach. Mario is the world's worst when it comes to command of a game. It's not just about, "He should have done this instead of that". It's about his entire approach being wrong. It's about playing down to every team we face, regardless of talent discrepancy. It's not just in game decisions, like kicking a FG, then not trying an onside kick. It's about getting the most out of his talent the other 56+ minutes so it never comes down to that.

He does less with more than any coach out there.
So it's not a game-day issue. That's all he was asking.
 
Advertisement
Many on here say Mario left Lanning a great situation, but the #s say otherwise as far as # of transfers Lanning has made in his tenure to improve his roster. This was year 3 of Mario and Lanning is running circles around him again. Oregon got the better of the deal with Mario coming here
Anyone who ever argued this is legit retarded
 
Can you identify particular game-day coaching issues that impacted the outcome of today's game?
christmas vacation GIF
 
Advertisement
Back
Top