HurricaneU
American Patriot
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 2,933
They are toast. Move on.
Now, it will come down if she was helpless, as she was not a minor and age of consent is 17.
I hope I'm wrong, and I hope you're right. I'm simply highly skeptical that this will be the way that Saban/Jimbo/Muschamp and others will try to twist this situation when speaking to recruits and their families that we're going against them for.Mind your own business, fvckwad. Keep your idiocy on the Baseball board, we don't need it here.Get used to this from fans like Bwcd, life is over, sky is falling, we should forfeit, blah blah. O don't contradict him, he is a recruiting guru, rpi expert, etc. Just ignore him. Only way I saw it was all the embedded threads, bad read.
I never said "life is over, sky is falling, we should forfeit". I said I think it's going to adversely affect recruiting, and last more than 1 day in the news cycle...and said if I was wrong, that I'd rep those that were correct.
So, again--fvck you.
Oh, and somebody quote this so that tard can see it since he has me on ignore.
I'm not sure if it will really have a negative affect recruiting. Unless of course, the recruits were interested in coming to Miami to rape girls. But in that case, I'm pretty sure FSU would be their preferred destination anyways. If anything, I think it may end up being a positive for both recruits and parents in showing that Miami does not tolerate bullsh!t like this.
You guys are ridiculous.
This states that the two admitted to buying drinks and having *** with her. Most likely the girl said she would be pressing charges and they turned themselves in.
Now, it will come down if she was helpless, as she was not a minor and age of consent is 17.
They may have self incriminated their selves depending on how much they said, but there could be a trial and they found not guilty if the girl were to say she knew what was going on.
There is a reason we have due process and innocent until proven guilty.
These boys may be guilty, but the judge decides that, not you or anyone on twitter.
The girl hasn't spoke yet.
Statutory rape of a girl they provided alcohol to and drugged.
There was no statutory rape, all 3 met the age of consent in Florida.
(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. As used in this section, "sexual activity" means oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.
What it's gonna come down to basically, is did they drug, and have *** with the "victim" against her will.
She didn't consent and is under 18. They raped a minor, right?
If she had consented no, but since she didn't yes... & on school property so the University could find itself in a lawsuit too.
You guys are ridiculous.
This states that the two admitted to buying drinks and having *** with her. Most likely the girl said she would be pressing charges and they turned themselves in.
Now, it will come down if she was helpless, as she was not a minor and age of consent is 17.
They may have self incriminated their selves depending on how much they said, but there could be a trial and they found not guilty if the girl were to say she knew what was going on.
There is a reason we have due process and innocent until proven guilty.
These boys may be guilty, but the judge decides that, not you or anyone on twitter.
The girl hasn't spoke yet.
In the penultimate sentence in the last paragraph, they admit to performing sexual acts WITHOUT HER CONSENT. Another way of saying they have admitted to raping her.
Obviously, this does not align with our core values.
Two complete and utter losers
Jamal carter to lb
Honestly, what is even worse is that the "victim" was underage...regardless if they raped her or not, the fact that she is underage is what will get them booted off of the team.
The report said juvenile, but then said all parties involved are UM students.
Personally, I'm a big fan of the whole, "innocent until proven guilty," aspect of our judicial system.
Burden of proof is on the prosecution and not the defendant.
Let's not rush to judgement until actual facts are known.
They also ADMITTED to the crimes. What else do you want???
Allegedly.
First and foremost: obviously, if this is true, these dudes deserve what they have coming. That said, innocent until proven guilty is the way it's set up. And it's not like there's never been anyone wrongfully accused, or nobody's ever been alleged to have admitted something only to find out later that it's not true (whether statements were misinterpreted, fabricated, or otherwise).
Ever seen My Cousin Vinny? "I shot the clerk...I shot the clerk." It happens.
If I had to guess, these guys are toast and probably should be. But it's a guess. No doubt this all looks about as bad as it gets in terms of initial reports. But it's easy to rush to judgment. I remember about a week ago social media was going nuts trying to save the "father" in Georgia that left his kid in the car. Now, as more information comes out, everyone's ready to crucify him.
We'll see how this goes, but so far it's ugly.
They turned themselves in so allegedly is thrown out the window.