And in terms of “how did we wind up with x as coach” as proof that any subsequent decision Rad is involved in might also suck, if you make a bad decision (which I’m not even sure yet of because being fair it is too early in tenure to say that even if I didn’t love the hire either) does it mean every decision you make in your profession is going to be bad?
Because Rad already has a track record of making unbelievably short sighted decisions without thinking of the long term implications. You know why are in this mess with the GOR in the first place and have teams suing the ACC? It's because Rad was one of the biggest cheerleaders for signing a Grant of Rights that locked the acc into a 20 year contract. Heres what he said after Swofford announced that we were locked into a deal through 2036, and patted himself on the back for making teams forfeit media rights if they try to leave the ACC.
“That’s the glue. You don’t get to this point without understanding who you’re dancing with,” Radakovich said. “Certainly, longer term, there will be additional resources available to help fund our programs. Shorter term, the ACC brand, the Clemson brand and all of our 15 institutions, its sets us in a really good circumstance. As there are five Power 5 conferences, we need to make sure that we are positioned in a really good way to stay competitive with those other leagues.”
ACC extends ESPN deal to 2036, plans 20-game hoops schedule
www.greenvilleonline.com
How's that working out?
And before you say, "oh well, that was just one egregiously bad mistake which has resulted in the death of the acc, can't judge his decision making from that"
He also single handedly cost Clemson tens of millions of dollars by committing a blatant Title IX violation. He unilaterally ended men's track and field and cross country at Clemson and literally said "the decision is final." The athletes lawyered up and had Clemson dead to rights. Clemson had to reinstate both programs AND THEN create two new non revenue women's sports (lacrosse and gymnastics).
So Rads attempt to cut costs by eliminating two men's programs resulted in Clemson having to indefinitely fund four non revenue sports. That's some 4d chess sh#t right there.
Here's what the men's teams lawyer said:
"This was a huge problem of Clemson’s own making, and they had no one to blame but themselves,” said Bryant. “They had not only put the school in violation of Title IX [by cutting the men’s programs], but had made the female athletes so angry that they were now aware of their rights and prepared to sue for their equal financial athletic aid and treatment, which they likely would have never done if Clemson had simply left things alone.”
Thats two epic unforced errors costing untold millions, and I havent even mentioned how bad UM sports are right now - this may be an all-time low for UM sports. We are something like 0-25 against FSU right now. And then you ask how anyone could doubt his decision making.
----
BTW -
I have been exceedingly polite and trying to engage in civil conversation with others. Some look at facts one way, I see them in another but I've never once told anyone I am right and they are wrong. Yet you keep calling me a troll for posting researched and sourced info that happens to hurts your feelings. You have some soft shoulders, bro.