MEGA Conference Realignment and lawsuits Megathread: Stories, Tales, Lies, and Exaggerations

WE don't have to agree ... but "media agreements" require a 2/3rds vote of members.
Clemson and FSU would not be voting as they would not BE ACC conference members. Timing is everything.
After July 1, 2024 Cal, Stanford, SMU come on board and the conference would have 15 voting members on football media agreements, not including FSU, Clemson, or ND (who is not a football member and therefore shouldn't be voting on a football media contract).

All it takes is 10 of the 15 conference members voting FOR the new deal.

I see these teams voting FOR
BC
Wake Forest
Syracuse
Stanford
Cal
SMU
Pitt
UVA
Duke
Ga Tech

Against
Miami
UNC
Va Tech
NC State
Louisville

If the vote is BEFORE July 1 we have a better chance. After ... good luck. Still hoping for a miracle and 8 teams vote to dissolve prior to June.

I don't see SMU, Pitt, UVA, or Duke voting for, when all of them would be welcomed in the Big12 and would make more.....
 
Advertisement
Again, I hope you're right and ALL of these supposed "insiders" are wrong. They all have the Canes 4th or 5th best option at the highest.
jfc who gives a **** if you have the fourth seat in the front row at the concert if there are at least four seats in the front row and everyone else doesn't have a ticket. I think Miami probably is 3rd or fourth (Notre Dame is not joining a conference next round- I'll buy someone tickets to their first conference game if I am wrong) and there will almost certainly either be 4+ seats available OR something wild takes place (like next apocalypse version of covid) and even FSU is still stuck. In which case we all have issues....

And **** genetics as an insider- the guy is more wrong than my wife. He's changing "support" for Miami on politics and optics but yeah let me believe his take. FSU **** is so far up his *** as their hero on their boards and on Twitter I am surprised he can even breathe.

Do you think the Ohio State President or Fox Executives give a **** what optics are in lawsuits and the various strategies behind them? PAC12 schools were threatening lawsuits and voting to continue the league the night before 3 joined the BIg12.

I can make an argument that B1G admin side might not love how "impolite" FSU is being to someone they might want to live in their house for decades. I also highly doubt (but possible of course cause Miami still can Miami) that through back channels Miami hasn't at least told FSU and Clemson why they may have been doing what they are - Miami would be stupid not to IMO because the last thing you want if you don't wind up in same conference is the rivalry dying out of spite. We shall see.

None of that **** matters. Everything is a negotiating play. I hate the optics of Miami right now and wish we were suing just to stop the ****** monologues and FSU trolling and I wish JF wasn't our possible lame-duck president right now. But from a purely legal perspective as much as I hate to admit it, Miami case is not as strong as FSU because of all the state-related issues, but yes if they win, we would win in terms of path too (still would have to take action of course as @TheOriginalCane often says at some point).
 
Last edited:
Having sold reverse mortgages (the most soul sucking, depressing job of my life) , I can tell you - no, it almost always is not.

But as for the Big 12, I think that's where we eventually end up after sitting on our thumbs for too long and the P2 deciding that they don't need to further dilute shares (at least for a few years) . It's not great and means we clearly got out maneuvered by FSU - even the most irrational UM sunshine pumpers will have to admit FSU won the long game- but at least we'll recruit better in Texas (probably)
We’re not going to the Big 12. I know you want that to happen, but “sitting on our thumbs” to you and half of this board = not blowing an air horn on what we’re doing re: realignment. Also, we’re not sitting on our thumbs here.
 
But Clemson and FSU will be able to jump the SEC whenever because espn wants it to happen, and the acc is going to be on board with the plan because it gets rid of its two most vocal critics and turns down the temperature on acc leadership.

No turning down the thermostat at this point.

Once FSU and Clemson officially bail, it's gonna be rats fleeing a sinking ship.

The ACC is done for
 
Advertisement
We ONLY end up there if a). The ACC is dissolved and b). B10 won't take us even on a partial share for several years.

HUGE RISK is that with the 3 new dilutive programs joining, FSU and Clemson leaving, it only takes 2/3rds vote of members to approve a NEW GOR. So ESPN offers $25M per team per year, down from the current $40+, and the weak sisters all vote YEAH as they have no other home. We would need SIX to vote no. And FSU and Clemson aren't voting.
At that point we’d pay the buyout to leave the conference. Also, even in that scenario, you’d have us, UNC, NCST, Louisville, UVA, and VT vote no.
 
At that point we’d pay the buyout to leave the conference. Also, even in that scenario, you’d have us, UNC, NCST, Louisville, UVA, and VT vote no.
If we would have THOSE VOTES THEN ... why not NOW along with FSU & Clemson .... VOTE TO DISSOLVE and save the $130M ACC buyout fee. The revised ESPN media deal will be $25M with a lot of luck. No way does it approach the current number.
 
If we would have THOSE VOTES THEN ... why not NOW along with FSU & Clemson .... VOTE TO DISSOLVE and save the $130M ACC buyout fee. The revised ESPN media deal will be $25M with a lot of luck. No way does it approach the current number.
Because the scenario you’d mentioned is akin to a gun to the head to us and those five other teams. They’d be presented with the worst media deal in P4 football. That’s not what any team here is facing right now. If presented with that option things would change.
 
July 1 is two and a half months away. There's no chance a settlement is going to happen that quickly.


Not so sure on that one. If it was just "gears of justice turning", then, yes, it might not happen quickly, but if a media partner or partners gets involved, it could go much more quickly.
 
Advertisement
I stand by my belief that Rads top preference is staying in the ACC

Im Not No Way GIF


The money divide between the SEC/B1G and ACC will soon be like the linebacker gap between Ray Lewis and Ryan Ragone (no shade on RR).

No school is riding the Titanic to the bottom of the ocean if it has a choice

Let FSU and Clemson kick the door down, then UNC make an announcement it's leaving, too, and the ACC will crumble quicker than Billy Napier's coaching reputation

Just have a little patience
 
Because the scenario you’d mentioned is akin to a gun to the head to us and those five other teams. They’d be presented with the worst media deal in P4 football. That’s not what any team here is facing right now. If presented with that option things would change.
??? You're voting to dissolve to JOIN either the B10, SEC or B12, not be "presented with a media deal". The media deal ESPN will propose to the "left over ACC members" after FSU and Clemson leaves ... will be much lower than the B12.
 
#7....c'mon now...SoFL is nowhere close to Top 10, I don't even think Top 30...

Now, concentration of wealthy zip codes...ok...different story...

I see your point for the others though...

Bro, you responded without knowing what you’re talking about.

South Florida is in top tier in the nation for net migration and new multifamily development. You’ve gotta go off of numbers, rather than % growth because metro Miami is already really big at over 6mm. South Florida has, and will continue to be a leader in population growth.

I previously cited an annual growth number, but some of the data gets to be unclear when looking at Miami, Miami-Dade, South Florida. Big picture, Miami vs South Florida, both are in the top 10 for growth nation wide

Dallas, Austin, Raleigh Durham and are also in this list.

The BigTen wants into Florida
 
Last edited:
Im Not No Way GIF


The money divide between the SEC/B1G and ACC will soon be like the linebacker gap between Ray Lewis and Ryan Ragone (no shade on RR).

No school is riding the Titanic to the bottom of the ocean if it has a choice

Let FSU and Clemson kick the door down, then UNC make an announcement it's leaving, too, and the ACC will crumble quicker than Billy Napier's coaching reputation

Just have a little patience
UNLESS ESPN brokers a DEAL taking Clem / FSU to the SEC and gets ACC members to accept a revised (lower) media deal.
 
Advertisement
Hear there is some smoke from the B12 about offering a “select echelon” of teams sprinkled throughout the country a “100+” percentage of their TV revenue. Essentially the opposite of what SMU, Oregon, and others have done. If we can get into that select group, Miami may be able to salvage its future after the ACC collapses.

Sometimes a reverse mortgage is just plain smart.
Celebrity gif. Reggie Sergile, also known as the rapper Conceited, holds a red cup and is listening to someone speak. He looks skeptical as he looks at us and puckers his lips exaggeratedly, looking down and swinging his body around to take a step away in doubt.
 
But as for the Big 12, I think that's where we eventually end up after sitting on our thumbs for too long and the P2 deciding that they don't need to further dilute shares (at least for a few years) .

Not following what you're saying here.

You think UM's administration should be setting fire to every bridge within 100 miles like what's going on in Tallahassee?

Name one Big Ten expansion addition that created even a small ripple before leaving?

USC and UCLA certainly didn't when they snuck out at midnight.

U-Dub and Oregon were lying through their teeth even after they left the Pac-12, saying something to the effect of "we would've stayed if only the money and exposure in the proposed media agreements had been a little better."

Yeah, right. Sure y'all would've stayed and been relegated to a second-tier conference by choice
 
I love everyone on the board, and I respect the ongoing conversation.

But this concept that "the Big 12" will be anywhere near comparable to what the Big 10/SEC are doing is just nutty.

And you can save the "but it's better than nothing" line. So is the ACC ("better than nothing").

We need to march on the Big 10 and burn the bridges behind us.

Anything less is death to our way of life (playing for championships).
 
Advertisement
Not following what you're saying here.

You think UM's administration should be setting fire to every bridge within 100 miles like what's going on in Tallahassee?

Name one Big Ten expansion addition that created even a small ripple before leaving?

USC and UCLA certainly didn't when they snuck out at midnight.

U-Dub and Oregon were lying through their teeth even after they left the Pac-12, saying something to the effect of "we would've stayed if only the money and exposure in the proposed media agreements had been a little better."

Yeah, right. Sure y'all would've stayed and been relegated to a second-tier conference by choice


At this point, yes.

Politely.

But, yes, we should be filing our lawsuit and making our moves.

It was sickening to read all the "let's just sit on the sidelines and let F$U do all the legal heavy lifting for us" nonsense a few months ago.

Now it's just certifiably insane.

The building is on fire and we are sitting here waiting for some brave fireman to climb 20 flights of stairs to carry us to safety.
 
Not following what you're saying here.

You think UM's administration should be setting fire to every bridge within 100 miles like what's going on in Tallahassee?

Name one Big Ten expansion addition that created even a small ripple before leaving?

USC and UCLA certainly didn't when they snuck out at midnight.

U-Dub and Oregon were lying through their teeth even after they left the Pac-12, saying something to the effect of "we would've stayed if only the money and exposure in the proposed media agreements had been a little better."

Yeah, right. Sure y'all would've stayed and been relegated to a second-tier conference by choice
Why are you comparing what schools on expiring deals did to Miami's situation? What are you trying to call a similarity?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top