I thought so too until I ran the numbers. Look at my previous two posts. If the teams exiting the acc pay 350 million to buy back the media rights (negotiated down from 575 million), then under the ACCs new "winners take more model", the top acc teams would make nearly as much (and possibly more) as the top P2 teams through 2027. The conference quality will be terrible, but given the expanded playoffs, that doesn't hurt as much, plus we might actually win the acc for once. That said, UM football is dead is we don't get out in 2027.
As I have said numerous times, my personal belief is that Dan Rad wants to try to save the acc and make it the premier academic conference. Look at the schools who opposed letting in Stanford, Cal, and SMU because it would make it exponentially harder to dissolve the acc.
Clemson, Florida State, North Carolina and North Carolina State
Shocker- 3 of the 4 are the ones rumored to have guaranteed spots in the P2 (and NC St is dreaming it can piggy back into the P2 because of UNC). Rad was a key proponent of the current GOR that got us into this mess, and I just don't think he's going to do a 180 and now say that the deal he helped broker was complete and utter garbage. I'd be delighted if this is one of the rare times that I turn out to be wrong. A few people are telling themselves that Rad is playing the game on a different level and working out a secret deal that puts UM sports on top of the world. It's kinda sobering to realize that with Rad at the helm, we are currently in what may be the worst stretch ever for UM sports.
It's not much comfort - staying in the ACC through 2027 is not ideal and we are far better off leaving the conference, but I don't think it's the end of UM football just yet. If we are still in the acc in 2028, then we are definitely screwed.