MEGA Conference Realignment and lawsuits Megathread: Stories, Tales, Lies, and Exaggerations

Even when we renegotiate, WE GET NOTHING...

You don't like your 4.5%? **** you...


1706629977621.png
 
Advertisement
I wonder which smart poster talked about the mismatch between the length of the GOR and the length of the ESPN contract...


1706630049644.png
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Ooopsy...

Ya see, ya see, the ACC can do whatever it wants WITHOUT taking a 2/3 vote required by its own Constitution. Or it can ask the court to take away F$U's rights within the ACC, which it could ALSO accomplish by a 2/3 vote under its own Constitution...

But the ACC doesn't want to take any 2/3 votes. The ACC just wants to do what it wants to do, or get the courts to do what it wants to do...


1706631185362.png
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
sooooo, I gotta ask... where were all the ACC school legal teams, Admin, and Athletic Directors during all this happening??? Did no one know the family ties involved?

I would dig deeper into the Swofford financial records. How much was the son being paid by raycom, special bonus's, etc.... Same with the daughter at the bank. Every school should sue Swofford personally, Raycom, and the ACC, pitch for criminal charges to be brought up on Swofford and son. I gotta think if he's found guilt of criminal activity as the head of the conference, making decisions that cost the schools $100's of millions, we could get the ACC dissolved. That's just my common opinion..


Just asking, do YOU know what the children of all of your co-workers do for a living?

It should never be up to a bunch of universities to do a US-presidential-candidate-level vetting job on our conference Commissioner and his family members.
 
You're god**** right...

Where are all those porsters who keep telling us that the universities are sooooo sophisticated, and that all of this bargaining was freely-done and with no pressure or coercion or trickeration...

And, goodness, I wish I could remember the name of that brilliant poster who kept telling everyone that there was NO NEW CONSIDERATION for the extension of the GOR...


View attachment 281195
View attachment 281196
View attachment 281198

Appreciate you posting all the screenshots from the complaint. There's lots of discussion about how this was fundamentally a bad deal, that the ACC wasn't exactly forthright in its negotiations, etc. But is the crux of the argument that the GOR is invalid because it lacked new consideration? Or are they advancing other claims about its invalidity? (Looking for the brief bullet point summary)
 
Advertisement
Back
Top